S
Straightsteal
Posts: 9
Feb 8, 2010 8:40am
Which teams will be in the running for the title?
All players on a team are important, but which ones will be impact players for each team?
All players on a team are important, but which ones will be impact players for each team?
F
Flying Streak
Posts: 5
Mar 8, 2010 10:19pm
2009 stats for returning players not sure if this will format very well. The players are listed in order of placement in last years all league voting. Some others that may have been over looked were added at the botom.Straightsteal wrote: Which teams will be in the running for the title?
All players on a team are important, but which ones will be impact players for each team?
RANK FIRST LAST SCHOOL 2010 GRADE MAL TEAM BA HITS SB RBI RUNS ERA
1 Garrett Walker SJCC 12 1st 406 39 19 15 35 2.39
2 Cory Huffman Mohawk 12 1st 403 29 18 25 19 1.89
3 Greg Phillips Calvert 12 1st 515 35 0 33 26 NA
4 Chris Casey NB 12 1st 394 28 7 28 21 7.88
5 Andy Brickner Calvert 12 2nd 432 35 10 15 31 3.35
6 Cy Strahm Carey 12 2nd 407 22 23 5 19 10.50
7 Clinton Ebright NB 11 2nd 371 23 6 18 15 4.74
8 Tyler Tyree HL 10 2nd 386 34 1 22 25 2.00
9 Tony Klepper Calvert 12 2nd 279 17 4 19 20 3.69
10 Andrew Mack NR 11 2nd 338 24 7 11 11 NA
11 Zach Clouse NR 12 2nd 325 26 15 5 15 7.00
12 Aaron Kapelka HL 12 HNRBL 406 28 6 18 24 NA
13 Aaron Swint SJCC 11 HNRBL 358 29 12 16 25 NA
14 Aaron Konkle Mohawk 12 HNRBL 312 24 11 16 23 8.40
15 Alex Macielewicz SJCC 12 HNRBL 380 27 2 25 17 0.00
16 John Scherley SE 12 HNRBL 364 28 11 17 28 NA
17 Adam Zahner Calvert 12 HNRBL 354 28 9 15 27 NA
18 Jeremy Grant NB 12 HNRBL 341 28 7 13 20 2.19
19 DJ Dyer Carey 12 HNRBL 305 18 12 8 18 NA
20 Mathew Argabright Old Fort 10 HNRBL 357 10 0 3 5 4.67
NA Cody Feathers HL 12 NA 400 12 0 8 11 NA
NA Jeff Mapus SJCC 12 NA 391 9 3 2 8 4.85
NA Zach Milchalski SE 10 NA 316 12 1 14 11 5.63
NA Jake Schuld HL 12 NA 315 23 0 15 20 NA
NA Colin Behm Calvert 12 NA 314 16 3 16 18 NA
NA Eli Simon NB ? NA 310 18 2 9 15 NA
NA Adam Snider SJCC 12 NA 300 16 3 22 16 4.91
NA Cody Pelton NB ? NA 291 23 14 14 20 2.92
S
Straightsteal
Posts: 9
Mar 8, 2010 11:19pm
Thanks for the numbers. Looks like players from Calvert received the most votes. Do you think these numbers are an indication of who has the best shot at the title (Calvert will be on top), or do you think that it depends on other factors? I've heard from others that it may be a 4 team race between Calvert, SE, Hopewell, & SJCC. Your predictions?
F
Flying Streak
Posts: 5
Mar 8, 2010 11:49pm
2009 final standings
Seneca East 9-1
Hopewell Loudon 8-2
SJCC 7-3
Mohawk 7-3
Calvert 7-3
New Riegel 6-4
North Baltimore 4-6
St. Wendy 3-7
Carey 3-7
Old Fort 1-9
Bettsville 0-10
Lakota
I see the teams in groups of three. The top three are SE, SJCC, and Mohawk. SE is the deepest team in the league with solid talent in each class down to eighth grade. SE did lose a lot of their top players to graduation last year, but the JV has depth to fill in. The question I have about SE is do they have deep enough pitching for those multiple playing days in a row. SJCC has five solid starting pitchers. They also have nine strong offensive players, but they lack quality depth beyond their top nine. Mohawk’s Huffman will be one of the best players in the league. But it takes more than one player to make a baseball team.
The next group of three are HL, Calvert, and NR. HL really took a hit to graduation. Yost and Brown were a huge one two punch pitching and offensively. There is just no one there that can replace those two. To add to HL’s problem is the lack of depth. They have no returning juniors. Calvert has Philips returning and he finished hitting over 500 last year. Calvert’s problem will be pitching. I see NR’s stock on the rise. They may have depth problems and starting pitching issues, but they have solid incoming freshman that may have an impact on varsity.
I do not see the rest of the teams having enough pitching to push for a league title. However, baseball can be too close to call and anyone can win on any given day.
Seneca East 9-1
Hopewell Loudon 8-2
SJCC 7-3
Mohawk 7-3
Calvert 7-3
New Riegel 6-4
North Baltimore 4-6
St. Wendy 3-7
Carey 3-7
Old Fort 1-9
Bettsville 0-10
Lakota
I see the teams in groups of three. The top three are SE, SJCC, and Mohawk. SE is the deepest team in the league with solid talent in each class down to eighth grade. SE did lose a lot of their top players to graduation last year, but the JV has depth to fill in. The question I have about SE is do they have deep enough pitching for those multiple playing days in a row. SJCC has five solid starting pitchers. They also have nine strong offensive players, but they lack quality depth beyond their top nine. Mohawk’s Huffman will be one of the best players in the league. But it takes more than one player to make a baseball team.
The next group of three are HL, Calvert, and NR. HL really took a hit to graduation. Yost and Brown were a huge one two punch pitching and offensively. There is just no one there that can replace those two. To add to HL’s problem is the lack of depth. They have no returning juniors. Calvert has Philips returning and he finished hitting over 500 last year. Calvert’s problem will be pitching. I see NR’s stock on the rise. They may have depth problems and starting pitching issues, but they have solid incoming freshman that may have an impact on varsity.
I do not see the rest of the teams having enough pitching to push for a league title. However, baseball can be too close to call and anyone can win on any given day.
S
Straightsteal
Posts: 9
Mar 9, 2010 7:57am
I don't know much about Lakota. Wonder where they will be in the mix.
F
Flying Streak
Posts: 5
Mar 9, 2010 10:42am
Mohawk is going to be a team that could drop from the top three. Huffman’s pitching may out right win the game for them. But he can’t pitch every day. They may have a .500 record overall, but push near the top in the league standings because Huffman will pitch against the better MAL teams. I may have underestimated Calvert. They have solid offensive numbers but I question their defense and pitching. If they have improved in those areas, then they can go right to the top.
Hopewell Loudon’s numbers seem to be down this year. Their website only shows 19 players with no juniors or freshman. I know last year they did not have any sophomores so the listing of no juniors looks correct. I do not know if the listing of no freshman is just an oversight. I do know the freshman baseball players were near the bottom of the Seneca County League last year. HL is a well coached team, so you can never count them out.
Carey, Lakota, North Baltimore, and St. Wendy should be grouped together after the top six I listed in the post above. Lakota did not fair well last year against the MAL as I remember. They may have been saving their better pitching for the SLL, so those games may not be a good gauge for how they will finish. Carey really improved from 2008 to 2009. However, Carey has a big problem with numbers and did not field a JV team the last two years.
New Riegel has the same problem with numbers. If all NR’s guys are back, there will only be 13 returning sophomores, juniors and seniors. I know the freshman are good and should have good numbers, but their influence may not be felt for a year or two on the varsity field.
Hopewell Loudon’s numbers seem to be down this year. Their website only shows 19 players with no juniors or freshman. I know last year they did not have any sophomores so the listing of no juniors looks correct. I do not know if the listing of no freshman is just an oversight. I do know the freshman baseball players were near the bottom of the Seneca County League last year. HL is a well coached team, so you can never count them out.
Carey, Lakota, North Baltimore, and St. Wendy should be grouped together after the top six I listed in the post above. Lakota did not fair well last year against the MAL as I remember. They may have been saving their better pitching for the SLL, so those games may not be a good gauge for how they will finish. Carey really improved from 2008 to 2009. However, Carey has a big problem with numbers and did not field a JV team the last two years.
New Riegel has the same problem with numbers. If all NR’s guys are back, there will only be 13 returning sophomores, juniors and seniors. I know the freshman are good and should have good numbers, but their influence may not be felt for a year or two on the varsity field.
S
Straightsteal
Posts: 9
Mar 11, 2010 8:52am
A lot of talk elsewhere about who will have the best pitching in the MAL this year. Most agree with you in that Huffman should be the dominant pitcher in the league with a lot of questions and debate after that. Some are saying that the league as a whole will have weak pitching. I would disagree with this thought. I believe that there is enough talent in the younger grades to get the job done, even though they will be green. Thoughts?