Comparing the SEC and Big 10 in Recruiting

College Sports 63 replies 2,503 views
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Feb 3, 2010 8:07pm
this year by Rivals rankings

http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?SID=880

Top 25 recruiting class
Big Ten 2 teams
SEC 8 teams

Top 10 Recruiting
Big ten 0 teams
SEC 5 teams

5* commits
Big ten 1
SEC 11

SEC has better recruiting every year, better coaches, 5 out of the last 7 titles.
Sorry Big 10, but I dont see any turn around for your conference
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Feb 3, 2010 8:08pm
Damn, man. You never stop, do you? :)
ytownfootball's avatar
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 3, 2010 8:10pm
1 2 3 4 T
#13 PSU (11-2) 7 6 3 3 19
#12 LSU (9-4) 0 3 7 7 17
Final
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 3, 2010 8:12pm
cats are you that obsessed with the SEC?

The Big 10 just went 4-3 in their bowl games (not great, but good), so i'll take that perspective over recruiting classes..
Cleveland Buck's avatar
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 3, 2010 8:21pm
Those slow, low rated recruits at Penn State didn't have a problem with LSU.
Cleveland Buck's avatar
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 3, 2010 8:23pm
Recruiting rankings don't mean much. Anyone born south of the Mason Dixon or in California gets an extra star or two by their name.
Speedofsand's avatar
Speedofsand
Posts: 5,529
Feb 3, 2010 8:25pm
nobody counts that mudfest as a game.
SEC has better players, teams, coaches, and games.
Cleveland Buck's avatar
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 3, 2010 8:26pm
You don't count it as a game. Everyone else does. They both played on the same field.
ytownfootball's avatar
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 3, 2010 8:28pm
Speedofsand wrote: nobody counts that mudfest as a game.
SEC has better players, teams, coaches, and games.
Way to leave yourself wide open to the subject you hate to defend the most.
DeyDurkie5's avatar
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Feb 3, 2010 8:44pm
OH you got us cats! now go pray to god that lsu doesn't suck dick and it will become the truth!
O
ou1980
Posts: 877
Feb 3, 2010 8:58pm
First time since 2003 that Ohio State hasn't made the Top 25 recruiting class ranking...
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Feb 3, 2010 9:19pm
ou1980 wrote: First time since 2003 that Ohio State hasn't made the Top 25 recruiting class ranking...
Just according to Rivals.

They're # 20 on Scout and #14 on ESPN.
S
Soda Popinski
Posts: 367
Feb 3, 2010 9:23pm
No u
R
rugbywrestler
Posts: 462
Feb 3, 2010 9:27pm
Speedofsand wrote: nobody counts that mudfest as a game.
SEC has better players, teams, coaches, and games.
Deal but we wont count Floridas ass whooping of OSU then either since Troy Smith was overweight and Teddy Ginn got hurt on the opening kickoff
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Feb 3, 2010 9:38pm
Cleveland Buck wrote: Those slow, low rated recruits at Penn State didn't have a problem with LSU.
Field conditions decided that game. On turf, LSU's speed would of ate up PSU, IMO
Cleveland Buck wrote: Recruiting rankings don't mean much. Anyone born south of the Mason Dixon or in California gets an extra star or two by their name.
So I guess that 2 of Ohio's three 5*'s that went to LSU and Texas would of been 6*'s if they lived down south. Great logic.;)
DeyDurkie5's avatar
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Feb 3, 2010 9:46pm
cats gone wild wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: Those slow, low rated recruits at Penn State didn't have a problem with LSU.
Field conditions decided that game. On turf, LSU's speed would of ate up PSU, IMO
Cleveland Buck wrote: Recruiting rankings don't mean much. Anyone born south of the Mason Dixon or in California gets an extra star or two by their name.
So I guess that 2 of Ohio's three 5*'s that went to LSU and Texas would of been 6*'s if they lived down south. Great logic.;)
not any worse than you claming "field conditions" on a loss turd
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Feb 3, 2010 9:50pm
Dey Durkie, I dont even know why you post towards me. I cant read it considering you are on my ignore list.
DeyDurkie5's avatar
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Feb 3, 2010 10:03pm
cats gone wild wrote: Dey Durkie, I dont even know why you post towards me. I cant read it considering you are on my ignore list.
I don't post towards you, I respond to what you say..hence the point of a message board
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 3, 2010 10:05pm
cats gone wild wrote: this year by Rivals rankings

http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?SID=880

Top 25 recruiting class
Big Ten 2 teams
SEC 8 teams

Top 10 Recruiting
Big ten 0 teams
SEC 5 teams

5* commits
Big ten 1
SEC 11

SEC has better recruiting every year, better coaches, 5 out of the last 7 titles.
Sorry Big 10, but I dont see any turn around for your conference
Still bitter about the loss to PSU? QQ
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Feb 3, 2010 10:06pm
cats gone wild wrote: this year by Rivals rankings

http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?SID=880

Top 25 recruiting class
Big Ten 2 teams
SEC 8 teams

Top 10 Recruiting
Big ten 0 teams
SEC 5 teams

5* commits
Big ten 1
SEC 11

SEC has better recruiting every year, better coaches, 5 out of the last 7 titles.
Sorry Big 10, but I dont see any turn around for your conference
You suck on the SEC more than a whore wanting crack.
Cleveland Buck's avatar
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 3, 2010 10:08pm
cats gone wild wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: Those slow, low rated recruits at Penn State didn't have a problem with LSU.
Field conditions decided that game. On turf, LSU's speed would of ate up PSU, IMO
You're right. It is unfair that only fast players get slowed down by the mud. Slow players don't. They float above the mud.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Feb 3, 2010 10:08pm
cats gone wild wrote: this year by Rivals rankings

http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?SID=880

Top 25 recruiting class
Big Ten 2 teams
SEC 8 teams

Top 10 Recruiting
Big ten 0 teams
SEC 5 teams

5* commits
Big ten 1
SEC 11

SEC has better recruiting every year, better coaches, 5 out of the last 7 titles.
Sorry Big 10, but I dont see any turn around for your conference
According to Rivals: 5-Stars

2010 - SEC only got 9 out of 26
2008 - SEC only got 9 out of 30
2007 - SEC only got 10 out of 30
2006 - SEC only got 9 out of 28
2005 - SEC only got 5 out of 28
2004 - SEC only got 5 out of 25

Try to prove you aren't completely ignorant by answering the following question.

WHY DIDN'T THE SEC GET A FEW OF THE FOLLOWING 5-Star players: Reggie Bush, Adrian Petterson, Chad Henne, Dan Conner, Dan Doering, Kevin Grady, Demarcus Granger, Mark Sanchez, Ray Maualuga, Stefan Johnson, Taylor Mays, Brandon Graham, Tyrod Taylor, Arrelious Benn, Trey Allen, Noel Devine, Josh Oglesby, Joe McKnight, Jimmy Clauson, Michael Floyd, Baker Steinkuhler, Matt Barkley. Devon Kennard. Beanie Wells, Michael Brewster, Devier Posey, Mike Adams, Terrell Pryor, Corey Brown Dorian Brown

If you have no answer......how about this one.

Could it be the majority are from California, Texas and the Mid-West and didn't want any part of playing below the racist Mason Dixon Line?

You should really band wagon another SEC school. LSU is quickly becoming irrelevant in the SEC.
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Feb 3, 2010 10:12pm
Cat is the poster child to why so many HATE the SEC. ARROGANCE and the continued NAUSIATING chest thumping!!

Of course, when your FAV team suffers thru TWO UNDERACHIEVING PITIFUL seasons....you gotta have something else to deflect the OBVIOUS.
C
charliehustle14
Posts: 2,224
Feb 3, 2010 10:14pm
I didn't think it was possible for one person to deep throat an entire conference.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Feb 3, 2010 10:15pm
cats gone wild wrote: Dey Durkie, I dont even know why you post towards me. I cant read it considering you are on my ignore list.
"post towards" Again the swamp mucker proves how illiterate those below the Mason Dixon Line are.