Division I Poll
1 .Columbus Northland (14-0)
2. Mentor (13-0)
3. Warren Harding (13-1)
4. Gahanna Lincoln (15-0)
5. Lakewood St. Edward (11-3)
6. Huber Heights Wayne (13-2)
7. Massillon Jackson (12-2)
8. Westerville South (16-0)
9. Cincinnati LaSalle (12-2)
10. Toledo St. John’s (12-2)

Others: 11. Cincinnati Moeller, 12. Upper Arlington, 13. Cincinnati Winton Woods, 14. Cincinnati Princeton, 15. Westerville North, 16. North Canton Hoover, 17. Dublin Coffman, 18. Perrysburg, 19. Mansfield Sr., 20. Canton McKinley, 21. Canton Timken, 22. Trotwood-Madison, 23. Cleveland St. Ignatius, 24. Toledo CC, 25. Cincinnati Colerain, T25. Cincinnati Walnut Hills, and T25. Brunswick.

Division II Poll
1. Dayton Dunbar (14-1)
2. Cleveland Benedictine (12-3)
3. Akron Buchtel (12-0)
4. Akron SVSM (9-4)
5. Dayton Chaminade Julienne (12-2)
6. Columbus DeSales (14-2)
7. University School (12-1)
8. Poland Seminary (11-1)
9. St. Bernard Roger Bacon (11-3)
10. Dayton Thurgood Marshall (10-3)

Others: 11. Logan Elm, 12. Defiance, 13. Wilmington, 14. Toledo Libbey, 15. Celina, 16. Port Clinton, 17. Lexington, 18. St. Paris Graham, 19. Bishop Fenwick, 20. Elida, 21. Van Wert, 22. Bishop Watterson, 23. Louisville, 24. Dover, and 25. Bethel-Tate.

Division III Poll
1. Cincinnati Taft (12-2)
2. Findlay Liberty-Benton (14-0)
3. Middletown Madison (16-0)
4. Plymouth (14-0)
5. Anna (14-2)
6. Orrville (11-3)
7. Coldwater (11-2)
8. Oak Hill (13-1)
9. Peebles (14-0)
10. East Canton (13-0)
T10. Lima CC (9-4)
T10. Ottawa-Glandorf (9-4)

Others: 13. Ironton, 14. Archbold, 15. St. Henry, 16. Metamora Evergreen, 17. Cincinnati Madeira, 18. Cincinnati Reading, 19. Cincinnati Shroder, 20. Hamilton Badin, 21. Campbell Memorial, 22. Cleveland VASJ, 23. Sugarcreek Garaway, 24. Chesapeake, and 25. Delphos Jefferson.

Division IV Poll
1. Dayton Jefferson (11-3)
2. Continental (14-0)
3. Newark Catholic (14-0)
4. Harvest Prep (11-4)
5. Berlin Hiland (12-1)
6. Shadyside (14-0)
7. Fort Recovery (12-1)
8. Cincinnati Seven Hills (13-2)
9. South Charleston SE (13-1)
10. Youngstown Christian (13-1)
T10. Kalida (11-2)

Others: 12. Delphos St. John’s, 13. McComb, 14. Pandora-Gilboa, 15. New Bremen, 16. Fort Loramie, 17.Columbus Grove, 18. New Knoxville, 19. New Riegel, 20. Toledo Ottawa Hills, 21. McDonald, 22. Miller City, 23. Wellsville, 24. Dalton, and 25. Carey

Finally some respect for Westerville South.

That is the JJ huddle power poll not the AP poll.

Yeah, no way this is the AP. Newark Catholic is #1 in D4.

My bad guys....I briefly glanced at JJ's homepage for the rankings but didn't realize this was their power poll and not the AP poll. I will change the title of the thread to avoid confusion.

no problem. Honestly, other than the Newark Catholic ranking....this poll looks a little better. I really have little faith in the AP rankings.

JJ will be charging for the use of his poll on here - ha ha

erie warrior wrote: JJ will be charging for the use of his poll on here - ha ha

$12/view

wes_mantooth wrote: no problem. Honestly, other than the Newark Catholic ranking....this poll looks a little better. I really have little faith in the AP rankings.

^^agree. with Warren Harding's beatdown of Iganatius in D1, they could easily be #2, but that's splitting hairs. And haven't seen NC in D4, so can't comment on them. Jefferson has a major stud and have played some major competititon; their record shouldn't fool anyone.

This is the Ohio High School Hoops Blog poll. Guy just co-signed it over to JJ.

OHSHoops.com

RedRider1 wrote: This is the Ohio High School Hoops Blog poll. Guy just co-signed it over to JJ.

OHSHoops.com

Wonder if he charged JJ.

I love how Cardington is #8 in the D3 AP Poll but not even on this dude's radar.

Does anyone have any feedback as to why high school basketball doesn't utilize a computer rankings system similar to football? It seems to work pretty effectively in football and considers strength of opponent/size of school. It seems to me that this would be more effective than an AP poll that essentially means nothing in the grand scheme of things. If implemented, the computer rankings could be used to rank teams in the district instead of merely by record.

mainly because in basketball everybody gets to go to the tournaments, while in football only a select few, so it's much more important in footbal for them to "get it right". maybe the seedings are a bit off this way, but everyone gets a chance.

^^^I agree with that. In basketball, the AP poll is mainly for us to discuss and complain about...lol. I love that it gets settled on the court.

ricola wrote: mainly because in basketball everybody gets to go to the tournaments, while in football only a select few, so it's much more important in footbal for them to "get it right". maybe the seedings are a bit off this way, but everyone gets a chance.

Plus since the coaches get to pick their games based on seedings you won't get the mismatches based on a weak schedule. The coaches know who they want to play and who they don't.

wildcats20 wrote: Finally some respect for Westerville South.

Crazy, huh?

They've beaten a great North team, 2 solid wins vs an VERY dangerous Central team, pounded D2 Watterson and Logan Elm whose records combined are probably 30-4.

I think they will get beat by North but even if they do they are a top 10 team in D1 in the state.

The AP poll is a joke, FYI. even though you know this already and that is why you posted this. Just ridiculous some of that garbage

Nice to see Toledo St. Johns get some respect in this poll.

It's JJ. No one cares.

does anyone still go to JJs?

Needs to be updated...Oak Hill is undefeated now because a team from WV (whom beat Oak Hill) had to forfeit their first 4 wins.