D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 1, 2010 8:17pm
Lets start filling in some names here.....
Ranked wrestlers (thanks FXSTC12)...Brakeman/Dispatch
103 3/ 1. Fiorucci (Olentangy)
112 23/ 2. McHugh (Olentangy),
119 6/ 1. Hutchins (Canal Winchester),
125 18/ 1. Caserta (Olentangy),
125 21/ 2. Whorle (Hilliard Bradley),
125 U/R/ 3. Tullius (Canal Winchester).
130 15/ 1. Fusco (Hartley),
130 U/R/ 3. Fosco (Olentangy).
135 6/ 1. Higgins (Hilliard Bradley),
140 U/R/ 2. Scipio (Hilliard Bradley),
140 22/ 3. Yant (Olentangy).
140 15/ 1. Strayer (Lakewood),
145 5/ 2. Rosch (Canal Winchester),
145 3/ 1. Grandominico (Olentangy),
152 4/ 2. Worley (Big Walnut),
152 15/ 1. Hetterscheidt (Olentangy),
152 14/ 3. Bellomy (Canal Winchester).
160 U/R/ 2. Gadd (Olentangy),
160 18/ Hosom (Lakewood)
160 27/ Riggs (Bradley)
171 U/R/ 3. Clark (Whitehall).
171 12/ 2. Zang (Hartley),
215 11/ 2. Brown (Big Walnut),
215 21/ 3. Stinemetz (Olentangy).
215 10/ 1. Jackson (Hartley),
285 16/ 3. Pressley (Canal Winchester).
**In random order:
103 Fiorucci (Olentangy), Fedousch (Buckeye Valley), Conley (BW), Sharp (Canal Winchester)
112 McHugh (Olen), Brady (CW)
119 Hutchins (CW), White (Big Walnut), Webber (Olen), Grimes (Hartley)
125 Caserta (Olen), Whorle (Hilliard Bradley), Tullius (CW), Gershom (Lakewood)
130 Fusco (Hartley), Fosco (Olen), Bright (Granville)
135 Higgins (Hilliard Bradley), Straight (Whitehall), Walls (East)
140 Strayer (Lakewood), Scipio (Bradley), Yant (Olen), Hoffman (BH)
145 Grandominico (Olen), Rosch (CW), Congos, (Lakewood), Driscoll (Bradley), Jones (BH)
152 Hetterscheidt (Olen), Worley (BW), Bellomy (CW)
160 Gadd (Olen), Riggs (Bradley), Hosom (Lakewood), Busby (East), Zang (Hartley)
171 Clark (WH), King (Lakewood)
189 Sheppard (Olen), Banks (CW)
215 Jackson (Hartley), Steinmetz (Olen), Brown (BW)
285 Pressley (CW), Maynard (Watterson), Griffith (BW)
This is just a start.....help fill in the blanks....
Ranked wrestlers (thanks FXSTC12)...Brakeman/Dispatch
103 3/ 1. Fiorucci (Olentangy)
112 23/ 2. McHugh (Olentangy),
119 6/ 1. Hutchins (Canal Winchester),
125 18/ 1. Caserta (Olentangy),
125 21/ 2. Whorle (Hilliard Bradley),
125 U/R/ 3. Tullius (Canal Winchester).
130 15/ 1. Fusco (Hartley),
130 U/R/ 3. Fosco (Olentangy).
135 6/ 1. Higgins (Hilliard Bradley),
140 U/R/ 2. Scipio (Hilliard Bradley),
140 22/ 3. Yant (Olentangy).
140 15/ 1. Strayer (Lakewood),
145 5/ 2. Rosch (Canal Winchester),
145 3/ 1. Grandominico (Olentangy),
152 4/ 2. Worley (Big Walnut),
152 15/ 1. Hetterscheidt (Olentangy),
152 14/ 3. Bellomy (Canal Winchester).
160 U/R/ 2. Gadd (Olentangy),
160 18/ Hosom (Lakewood)
160 27/ Riggs (Bradley)
171 U/R/ 3. Clark (Whitehall).
171 12/ 2. Zang (Hartley),
215 11/ 2. Brown (Big Walnut),
215 21/ 3. Stinemetz (Olentangy).
215 10/ 1. Jackson (Hartley),
285 16/ 3. Pressley (Canal Winchester).
**In random order:
103 Fiorucci (Olentangy), Fedousch (Buckeye Valley), Conley (BW), Sharp (Canal Winchester)
112 McHugh (Olen), Brady (CW)
119 Hutchins (CW), White (Big Walnut), Webber (Olen), Grimes (Hartley)
125 Caserta (Olen), Whorle (Hilliard Bradley), Tullius (CW), Gershom (Lakewood)
130 Fusco (Hartley), Fosco (Olen), Bright (Granville)
135 Higgins (Hilliard Bradley), Straight (Whitehall), Walls (East)
140 Strayer (Lakewood), Scipio (Bradley), Yant (Olen), Hoffman (BH)
145 Grandominico (Olen), Rosch (CW), Congos, (Lakewood), Driscoll (Bradley), Jones (BH)
152 Hetterscheidt (Olen), Worley (BW), Bellomy (CW)
160 Gadd (Olen), Riggs (Bradley), Hosom (Lakewood), Busby (East), Zang (Hartley)
171 Clark (WH), King (Lakewood)
189 Sheppard (Olen), Banks (CW)
215 Jackson (Hartley), Steinmetz (Olen), Brown (BW)
285 Pressley (CW), Maynard (Watterson), Griffith (BW)
This is just a start.....help fill in the blanks....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa17/7fa17121e38adb6a44299f615973081ea9d1ad3b" alt="Dirtyscramble's avatar"
Dirtyscramble
Posts: 328
Feb 1, 2010 8:22pm
Wow 125 looks TUFF!!
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 2, 2010 7:59am
I agree.....in some ways this sectional may be nearly as tough as the district tournament....especially if Claymont's Kyle Warner stays at 130 lbs. The East has a stud at the top (Arizona Miller), but there's not much depth at this weight beyond him.Dirtyscramble wrote: Wow 125 looks TUFF!!
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 2, 2010 2:14pm
Bishop Hartley's Zang supposedly just certified recently at 160......
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25913/25913d043195f34ff826d0d2e0ce06ae0a0b00bc" alt="cdva's avatar"
cdva
Posts: 25
Feb 2, 2010 3:19pm
112 Dennis from BV had a season ending injury in December
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 3, 2010 8:03am
Really sorry to hear that....wasn't he a Senior? That makes it all the worse....cdva wrote: 112 Dennis from BV had a season ending injury in December
B
bexleyboss112
Posts: 7
Feb 5, 2010 6:50pm
napeir broke his hand pretty sure he is out for a year.
B
bexleyboss112
Posts: 7
Feb 5, 2010 7:05pm
hartely 140 hoffman and 145 jones should be mentioned. jones had big win over amanda clearcreeks 145
T
TakedownChamp
Posts: 5
Feb 5, 2010 7:59pm
yeah jones should at least be mentioned for 3rd he is really solid this year at 145
K
ksig489
Posts: 943
Feb 6, 2010 7:47pm
I would have called Jones a sleeper...but it seems like everyone else knows about him. I watched the win against AC...great match for him.
D
DaKing171
Posts: 7
Feb 6, 2010 8:05pm
Looks like getting out of this sectional has a couple of weight classes sitting pretty at districts
T
TakedownChamp
Posts: 5
Feb 6, 2010 9:03pm
Yeah jones is having a good year so far hope he keeps it up...and what about Zang at 160 he was a sq last yr.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa17/7fa17121e38adb6a44299f615973081ea9d1ad3b" alt="Dirtyscramble's avatar"
Dirtyscramble
Posts: 328
Feb 8, 2010 9:14pm
ttt
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 10, 2010 12:04pm
Hartley should be a pretty good tournament team...TakedownChamp wrote: Yeah jones is having a good year so far hope he keeps it up...and what about Zang at 160 he was a sq last yr.
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 14, 2010 10:57pm
Napier is tough....he would have had a shot to stand atop the podium here...tough breakbexleyboss112 wrote: napeir broke his hand pretty sure he is out for a year.
H
hizzmuther
Posts: 215
Feb 17, 2010 11:45pm
Seeds, Brackets, Where? Not even an entry grid on Baums....
B
Bam175
Posts: 42
Feb 18, 2010 9:15am
Bracket Sheets out yet ????
B
bigdogdad
Posts: 54
Feb 18, 2010 9:26am
Amazing with all the technology there is nothing officially posted. It used to be at least the host schools have it on their web site. I guess since AC is D3 this year, their interest may be else where. Looking at some of the other districts i.e. Meadowbrook, what a joke some weights are. For example 215 and heavy only have seven wrestlers each. It looks possible for a kid to win one or two matches and makes it to the disticts. Some of the D1 schools only have 9-10 kids in a weight. Maybe we have too many sectionals. Then we throw in the weight allowance a joke that is. You don't see the basketball teams getting the goal lowered by two inches because of the snow. Why should wrestling make some stupid allowance.
J
jaba134
Posts: 37
Feb 18, 2010 9:47am
Because kids aren't allowed to practice, it makes it hard to maintain weight, wrestling is a unique sport when it comes to things like this.
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 18, 2010 9:47am
Sorry to mention this.... last year the brackets for the AC sectional didn't show up on Baum's page until a week or two AFTER the tournament.
Our coach said that the AC Athletic Director said at the meeting last night that the brackets would be up on Baum's page....still waiting
Our coach said that the AC Athletic Director said at the meeting last night that the brackets would be up on Baum's page....still waiting
D
Dad4Sports
Posts: 1,779
Feb 18, 2010 9:48am
Kids are soft! Get out and shovel!jaba134 wrote: Because kids aren't allowed to practice, it makes it hard to maintain weight, wrestling is a unique sport when it comes to things like this.
S
Shankapotamus
Posts: 58
Feb 18, 2010 10:00am
What's so unique about sticking to the rules? Considering that OSHAA jams the comical hydration test down your throat so wrestlers will "wrestler at their healthy weights", don't you find this weight allowance a bit hypacritical? Seems to me that they are rewarding those who are irresponsible and weight bouncing. For what? Bad weather THREE days before the competition.jaba134 wrote: Because kids aren't allowed to practice, it makes it hard to maintain weight, wrestling is a unique sport when it comes to things like this.
We need some leadership changes.
C
Cthelites
Posts: 1,951
Feb 18, 2010 10:47am
Total joke giving 2 lbs. For what one day of school and some cases 2 days at the beginning part of the week.Shankapotamus wrote:What's so unique about sticking to the rules? Considering that OSHAA jams the comical hydration test down your throat so wrestlers will "wrestler at their healthy weights", don't you find this weight allowance a bit hypacritical? Seems to me that they are rewarding those who are irresponsible and weight bouncing. For what? Bad weather THREE days before the competition.jaba134 wrote: Because kids aren't allowed to practice, it makes it hard to maintain weight, wrestling is a unique sport when it comes to things like this.
We need some leadership changes.
Let's encourage more weight cutting.
I think giving one lb would have been a gift...2?
S
samuel adams
Posts: 47
Feb 18, 2010 11:55am
I do not understand why you people are wining about the 2 lbs... your telling me that if you had been cutting all year and for sectionals you got 2 extra pounds you wouldn't love it!!!!!! If you don't agree with this you must of never cut weight, it is extremely hard for a kid thats cutting to stay at home for 2 days without practice.
K
knightflyer150
Posts: 491
Feb 18, 2010 12:14pm
I've cut plenty of weight, that really isn't a defining factor for an opinion. Two pounds is too much and is counter productive to what OHSAA is selling. "Hey, wrestle at your Alpha...wait, not really, here are two pounds."
I the end, it isn't a huge deal. We've got guys cutting that will like it and guys who don't that hate it.
I the end, it isn't a huge deal. We've got guys cutting that will like it and guys who don't that hate it.