The final-4 race is starting to heat up. Will the loss to Bowsher come back to haunt the Panthers?
Jan 30, 2010 9:39am
Swamp Fox
Senior Member
S
2,218posts
S
Swamp Fox
Senior Member
2,218
posts
Sat, Jan 30, 2010 9:50 AMJan 30, 2010 9:50 AM
I think that the loss to Bowsher was serious, but I also believe that Whitmer is starting to come together and the pieces are starting to fit very nicely. There is no question that the Panthers are very young and certainly they too are likely to play another inconsistent game and lose to someone else they should beat, but all the teams locked in with them are in the very same situation, and in my opinion, more likely to lose a game like that.
Jan 30, 2010 9:50am
jm71witmr
Member
J
85posts
J
jm71witmr
Member
85
posts
Sat, Jan 30, 2010 9:58 AMJan 30, 2010 9:58 AM
This was a big win for Whitmer over Libbey. Several players stepped up big and need to continue doing so.
The race is on! Its definitely a win your in for Whitmer in the next couple weeks. With a tough game at Findlay on Tuesday, then St francis on Friday, there is no room for any let down. The following week Friday at St Johns.
Jan 30, 2010 9:58am
ross ford81
Senior Member
R
220posts
R
ross ford81
Senior Member
220
posts
Sat, Jan 30, 2010 11:13 AMJan 30, 2010 11:13 AM
Besides Nigel (frosh) does Whitmer have other sophomores playing on varsity? Why are they always referred to as "so young"?
Jan 30, 2010 11:13am
irish_buffalo
Senior Member
I
103posts
I
irish_buffalo
Senior Member
103
posts
Sat, Jan 30, 2010 11:44 AMJan 30, 2010 11:44 AM
The Panthers only have three seniors on the roster and of those three only Randall Kennedy gets substantial playing time.
Jan 30, 2010 11:44am
ross ford81
Senior Member
R
220posts
R
ross ford81
Senior Member
220
posts
Sat, Jan 30, 2010 2:45 PMJan 30, 2010 2:45 PM
Not hardly an answer to my question. From what I know the Panthers have mostly juniors and their freshman has considerable experience playing very difficult competition with one of the top AAU programs in the nation. I'm just not accepting the "very young" description. How about St. John's? They have 2 seniors in their top 9 players, with a freshman, sophomore and junior in the starting lineup and a sophomore and two juniors next off the bench. Nobody refers to them as "young". And then there is Libbey (almost all juniors).
Jan 30, 2010 2:45pm
irish_buffalo
Senior Member
I
103posts
I
irish_buffalo
Senior Member
103
posts
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 12:19 AMJan 31, 2010 12:19 AM
I'd refer to Whitmer, SJ, and Libbey as all being 'young'.
Jan 31, 2010 12:19am
thechosenone
Senior Member
T
97posts
T
thechosenone
Senior Member
97
posts
Mon, Feb 1, 2010 6:53 AMFeb 1, 2010 6:53 AM
If Whitmer beats St. Francis this Friday, they will be in the final four if they do not slip up against Woodward or Clay.
Feb 1, 2010 6:53am
akron hammer
Junior Member
A
8posts
A
akron hammer
Junior Member
8
posts
Tue, Feb 2, 2010 2:29 PMFeb 2, 2010 2:29 PM
ross ford--As you know lineups change throughout a season but at the Scott game a few weeks ago Whitmer started two freshman, a sophomore, and two juniors. That line up was young by anyone's standards. I think St. John's is young but when a Senior is prominent on your team you will rarely hear folks talk about their youth due to a Senior adding the leadership and stability that young kids and a coach need.
Feb 2, 2010 2:29pm
ross ford81
Senior Member
R
220posts
R
ross ford81
Senior Member
220
posts
Tue, Feb 2, 2010 6:17 PMFeb 2, 2010 6:17 PM
Hammer -- that was an unusual lineup and that is not their lineup now or any other game this season. Whitmer is young. Libbey is young. SJJ is young. Central is fairly young.