S
SnotBubbles
Jan 27, 2010 2:11pm
CANCELED
We will try it again if we get some more accurate rankings. FFT's rankings were only for "Threads Started."
We will try it again if we get some more accurate rankings. FFT's rankings were only for "Threads Started."
Curly J
Posts: 7,282
Jan 27, 2010 2:14pm
BRF a 16 seed...how the mighty have fallen.
S
SnotBubbles
Jan 27, 2010 2:15pm
Yeah....seeds 13-16 (well except the first two 13's) are just ones I added. They aren't technically in the Top 50.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 27, 2010 2:17pm
Lame... FFT statistics are interesting... popularity contests are lame.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 27, 2010 2:19pm
left behind again... 
S
SnotBubbles
Jan 27, 2010 2:20pm
Fly4Fun...Anything else derogatory you want to add? You seem to be radiating negativity lately.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Jan 27, 2010 2:21pm
Damn...couldn't even get an at-large bid for one of the extra spots.
Oh well
Oh well
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 27, 2010 2:21pm
It's not so bad being left out.vball10set wrote: left behind again...
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 27, 2010 2:22pm
I've always been a big anti-popularity contest proponent... even on the old Huddle.SnotBubbles wrote: Fly4Fun...Anything else derogatory you want to add? You seem to be radiating negativity lately.
This is nothing new.
S
SnotBubbles
Jan 27, 2010 2:22pm
I'm sure I missed more than a few on the at large bids Sherm. I can always revise those...
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 27, 2010 2:22pm
LOL--touche'The_Crosby_Show wrote:It's not so bad being left out.vball10set wrote: left behind again...
S
SnotBubbles
Jan 27, 2010 2:24pm
I understand that, and that's fine. But I've seen your last two posts that followed mine and really want to understand the issue.Fly4Fun wrote:
I've always been a big anti-popularity contest proponent... even on the old Huddle.
This is nothing new.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Jan 27, 2010 2:25pm
I didn't make it. Wow.
S
SnotBubbles
Jan 27, 2010 2:27pm
Keebler...with 1,361 posts...i don't understand how you didn't make the Top 50 on FFT's list.
I really only hand picked 14 huddlers and most of those were the one's on FFT's thread wondering why they didn't make it. We'll do a play-in game for four 16 seeds. I'll revise this.
Post here if you want in on the play-in game.
I really only hand picked 14 huddlers and most of those were the one's on FFT's thread wondering why they didn't make it. We'll do a play-in game for four 16 seeds. I'll revise this.
Post here if you want in on the play-in game.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jan 27, 2010 2:27pm
I don't want to go against BRF. I love BRF. He makes me warm and fuzzy. Can I concede?
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jan 27, 2010 2:29pm
I think you ruin the sanctity of the Who's now tournament if you let in more than 64 posters. Honestly, if the smaller posters can't win their own conference, do they really deserve to be there? When was the last time a 16 seed ever made it past the first round anyway?SnotBubbles wrote: Keebler...with 1,361 posts...i don't understand how you didn't make the Top 50 on FFT's list.
I really only hand picked 14 huddlers and most of those were the one's on FFT's thread wondering why they didn't make it. We'll do a play-in game for four 16 seeds. I'll revise this.
Post here if you want in on the play-in game.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 27, 2010 2:30pm
I think you're an attention whore who constantly needs to be validated and you operate under the guise of trying to be edgy... capisce?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 27, 2010 2:31pm
please remove me
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jan 27, 2010 2:31pm
Who the hell are you talking to?Fly4Fun wrote: I think you're an attention whore who constantly needs to be validated and you operate under the guise of trying to be edgy... capisce?
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Jan 27, 2010 2:31pm
What are my odds of pulling the upset....SnotBubbles wrote:
3 SnotBubbles
14 Tiger2003
****A play-in game will be held for the four (4) #16 seeds. If you want to be in that poll, list your name below. First 10 to say they are in, are in.
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Jan 27, 2010 2:32pm
Fly just ignore it if you don't like it man.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 27, 2010 2:32pm
The person who addressed me. I thought that would be obvious.ernest_t_bass wrote:Who the hell are you talking to?Fly4Fun wrote: I think you're an attention whore who constantly needs to be validated and you operate under the guise of trying to be edgy... capisce?
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jan 27, 2010 2:32pm
Snotbubbles, an attention whore? Maybe here, but I will vouch that he is not in real life.
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jan 27, 2010 2:32pm
SnotBubbles wrote:I understand that, and that's fine. But I've seen your last two posts that followed mine and really want to understand the issue.Fly4Fun wrote:
I've always been a big anti-popularity contest proponent... even on the old Huddle.
This is nothing new.
Fly4Fun wrote: I think you're an attention whore who constantly needs to be validated and you operate under the guise of trying to be edgy... capisce?
ernest_t_bass wrote:Who the hell are you talking to?Fly4Fun wrote: I think you're an attention whore who constantly needs to be validated and you operate under the guise of trying to be edgy... capisce?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jan 27, 2010 2:33pm
The nutburger, I'd guess.ernest_t_bass wrote: Who the hell are you talking to?