In this world...an automatic weapon can be acquired. I could get an automatic weapon, walk into times square and mow down several people. Most police officers carry hand guns. For instance, Cleveland has police officers in most of their banks. But, if a serious, no-nonsense bank robbery occurred such as in the movie "Heat", it seems as if they would be of no use. If I'm in the bank while this happens, it seems as if me granting my power to the state to authorize a police force in order to protect me instead of me using self-help would have been moot.
Thus, should police officers carry automatic weapons to better be able to protect my life, liberty and property as we have vested in them that power? On the one hand, this endangers us as the government is more capable of tyranny...but on the other hand, it makes more meaningful our granting our great sacrifice of self-help to police.
Thoughts?
BoatShoes
Senior Member
B
5,703
posts
B
BoatShoes
Senior Member
5,703
posts
Thu, Jan 14, 2010 1:56 AM
Jan 14, 2010 1:56 AM
Jan 14, 2010 1:56am