Free? No.gut;1847852 wrote:Abortion should be fast, convenient and free. Isn't that how the saying goes?
Wasting billions each year jamming up the courts with frivolous laws designed to appease constituents? That's productive and helpful for the economy and progress!Con_Alma;1847856 wrote:I never had a desire to be a member of the Republican party but I have to admit, sleeper is making me reconsider based on all the things they are apparently fighting for that I am in favor of.
This isn't Fox News. This is factual inaccurate. Sorry!gut;1847854 wrote:Don't worry, Medicaid already covers their abortion.
Wrong again.sleeper;1847862 wrote:This isn't Fox News. This is factual inaccurate. Sorry!
Well I don't agree with that. Abortions should not be taxpayer funded.gut;1847864 wrote:Wrong again.
https://www.aclu.org/other/public-funding-abortion
"At present, the federal Medicaid program mandates abortion funding in cases of rape or incest, as well as when a pregnant woman's life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury."
You are really owning failure in this thread.sleeper;1847865 wrote:Well I don't agree with that. Abortions should not be taxpayer funded.
sleeper;1847865 wrote:Well I don't agree with that. Abortions should not be taxpayer funded.
sleeper;1847860 wrote:Wasting billions each year jamming up the courts with frivolous laws designed to appease constituents? That's productive and helpful for the economy and progress!
I thought you were still spending your time lying about PP and federally funded abortions. My bad for not catching the switch.gut;1847866 wrote:You are really owning failure in this thread.
Maybe you should try watching Fox News. You might learn something.
You're welcome. Donald Trump is the leader of the Republican party! Enjoy!Con_Alma;1847868 wrote:I'm impressed with the lengths you claim they go to in appeasing their constituents. It's just another thing you make the party sound appealing by sharing. I'm thankful for this thread.
There was no switch Medicaid pays DIRECTLY, and indirectly, for abortion. LIke I said, you should spend some time actually doing the research you pretended to do....and not just assume everything you refuse to believe is a lie originating from Fox News.sleeper;1847869 wrote:I thought you were still spending your time lying about PP and federally funded abortions. My bad for not catching the switch.
I am talking 100% about PP and they don't get reimbursement for abortions.gut;1847872 wrote:There was no switch Medicaid pays DIRECTLY, and indirectly, for abortion. LIke I said, you should spend some time actually doing the research you pretended to do....and not just assume everything you refuse to believe is a lie originating from Fox News.
So you were okay with Obama's EO?Con_Alma;1847873 wrote:I wouldn't be looking for enjoyment per se but If if Pres Trump continues the trend of the types of EOs he's signed and the types of judge nominations he's put forth then I can see me realizing some enjoyment from it.
It depends on which EO you are speaking of....some yes but most no. We have difference in ideology.sleeper;1847875 wrote:So you were okay with Obama's EO?
Why does the party of small government spend so much time acting like big brother when it comes to bathrooms people use and the choices they make between themselves and their doctor?
Why don't you believe in separation of church and state? Why do you feel you get the right to impose your regressive religious ideology on other people? Why do you feel you have the right to restrict the rights of others based on an unproven book that you were indoctrinated at birth to believe is correct which no evidence has ever been able to confirm? Why do you feel women should be considered 2nd class citizens with a life only destined for child birth and taking care of the homestead?Con_Alma;1847877 wrote:It depends on which EO you are speaking of....some yes but most no. We have difference in ideology.
I can't answer your second question because I'm not in the know but maybe to appease you constituents as you've claimed above.
I do believe in the establishment clause and free exercise clause.sleeper;1847879 wrote:Why don't you believe in separation of church and state? Why do you feel you get the right to impose your regressive religious ideology on other people? Why do you feel you have the right to restrict the rights of others based on an unproven book that you were indoctrinated at birth to believe is correct which no evidence has ever been able to confirm? Why do you feel women should be considered 2nd class citizens with a life only destined for child birth and taking care of the homestead?
Please defend your hateful, regressive, 1800's ideology. Thanks!
I have faith that you believe women are second class citizens. Why do you think society should be constructed on faith and not facts? Why are your feelings more important than facts?Con_Alma;1847880 wrote:I do believe in the establishment clause and free exercise clause.
I don't have the right to impose my religious views on anyone. I don't have the right to restrict others rights nor do they have the right to do so to mine.
What book do you think I was indoctrinated by at birth? ....certainly not eh Holy Bible. I addressed that issue with you long again. I didn't become a Christian until my 20s.
I don't believe women are second class citizens.
He sure does. http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?48227-Impressed-by-Trump-administration&p=1847767&viewfull=1#post1847767sleeper;1847883 wrote:I have faith that you believe women are second class citizens.
I will pray for your redemption.like_that;1847884 wrote:He sure does. http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?48227-Impressed-by-Trump-administration&p=1847767&viewfull=1#post1847767
We are all praying for yours. Lying to mask your sins won't help.sleeper;1847886 wrote:I will pray for your redemption.
I've tried to answer your questions but you don't answer mine. Why is that?sleeper;1847883 wrote:I have faith that you believe women are second class citizens. Why do you think society should be constructed on faith and not facts? Why are your feelings more important than facts?
It is a third mechanism of action for all oral contraceptives. They all materially reduce the endometrium and we know from in vitro that a reduced endometrium greatly reduces the likelihood of implantation.gut;1847847 wrote:One of several mechanisms, not the only one nor the primary one. And not universal to all oral contraceptives.
And essentially the Hobby Lobby case.