Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 11, 2016 1:02pm
Three of the last four holdouts have been taken into custody. The one from Ohio is reneging on the deal, losing his mind, talking about feeling suicidal, and declaring war on the U.S.
Seems about even chances of suicide, coming out shooting, or surrender.
These are some people's notion of modern-day "patriots"?
Seems about even chances of suicide, coming out shooting, or surrender.
These are some people's notion of modern-day "patriots"?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 11, 2016 1:17pm
These guys are all idiots
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Feb 11, 2016 1:19pm
Lock it up!SportsAndLady;1781032 wrote:These guys are all idiots
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 11, 2016 1:22pm
*Malheur
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 11, 2016 1:29pm
Morons being criminals under the "Naw, we's patriots!" banner.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 11, 2016 1:59pm
Really no different than "Naw, we're protesting" banner.Heretic;1781037 wrote:Morons being criminals under the "Naw, we's patriots!" banner.
4cards
Posts: 2,551
Feb 11, 2016 2:01pm
....Snot?queencitybuckeye;1781027 wrote:Three of the last four holdouts have been taken into custody. The one from Ohio is reneging on the deal, losing his mind, talking about feeling suicidal, and declaring war on the U.S.
Seems about even chances of suicide, coming out shooting, or surrender.
These are some people's notion of modern-day "patriots"?
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 11, 2016 2:51pm
Pretty much. Both groups are the answer to "What is the end result of under-education in a society?".sleeper;1781042 wrote:Really no different than "Naw, we're protesting" banner.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 11, 2016 3:18pm
The last one finally surrendered, earning the title of dumbest ass on the whole short bus.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Feb 11, 2016 3:47pm
I think wack jobs like this have always been around. Unfortunately we live in a day when we have to hear all about it.Heretic;1781050 wrote:Pretty much. Both groups are the answer to "What is the end result of under-education in a society?".
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 11, 2016 4:51pm
Generally speaking, and in the grand scheme, would you gents align yourselves with those who favor less government intrusion, or with those favoring BIG government and bureaucrats managing much of our lives?
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 11, 2016 5:37pm
Generally speaking, and in the grand scheme, I prefer not to align myself with morons, so that takes Y'all Queda out of the equation.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Feb 11, 2016 5:40pm
I'm sure Quaker sympathizes with them. SHOCKER!
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 11, 2016 8:06pm
How about the absurd notion that recognizes that government can't solve all issues nor should they try, but there are issues in which government can make a net positive impact? The fringe idiots at the extreme 5% on both sides of the spectrum are just that, idiots, and are dangerous in approximately equal amounts.QuakerOats;1781073 wrote:Generally speaking, and in the grand scheme, would you gents align yourselves with those who favor less government intrusion, or with those favoring BIG government and bureaucrats managing much of our lives?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 11, 2016 8:08pm
Well, some of these Meal Team Six dipshits could have less government in their lives by keeping their animals on their land, and not land that belongs to all of us. Or pay the fucking fees. Their choice.QuakerOats;1781073 wrote:Generally speaking, and in the grand scheme, would you gents align yourselves with those who favor less government intrusion, or with those favoring BIG government and bureaucrats managing much of our lives?
How about the absurd notion that recognizes that government can't solve all issues nor should they try, but there are issues in which government can make a net positive impact? The fringe idiots at the extreme 5% on both sides of the spectrum are just that, idiots, and are dangerous in approximately equal amounts.
These inbred, mouth-breathers are not patriots, the founders would be embarrassed that some try to equate them in any measure.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Feb 12, 2016 8:34am
That is a false premise. The alternatives aren't just Ayn Rand and Big Brother. There is a place for government to promote the greater good that private markets would not otherwise. I don't believe government should decide my life for me, however I would never entrust the good of society into the hands of corporate citizens.QuakerOats;1781073 wrote:Generally speaking, and in the grand scheme, would you gents align yourselves with those who favor less government intrusion, or with those favoring BIG government and bureaucrats managing much of our lives?
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 12, 2016 10:32am
Automatik;1781078 wrote:I'm sure Quaker sympathizes with them. SHOCKER!
I figured some here would leap to such a conclusion, but you are smarter than that.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 12, 2016 11:09am
PS --- it is nice to see the Feds protect the land; I wonder when they will start protecting it along the Mexican border?
Dumb me ..........
Dumb me ..........
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Feb 12, 2016 11:14am
So am I wrong or not?QuakerOats;1781150 wrote:I figured some here would leap to such a conclusion, but you are smarter than that.
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Feb 12, 2016 11:14am
Thanks for proving their point.QuakerOats;1781164 wrote:PS --- it is nice to see the Feds protect the land; I wonder when they will start protecting it along the Mexican border?
Dumb me ..........
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 12, 2016 11:20am
Spot on.QuakerOats;1781164 wrote:
Dumb me ..........
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 12, 2016 11:47am
Yes, wrong. Sorry to burst the bubble.Automatik;1781165 wrote:So am I wrong or not?
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 12, 2016 1:28pm
I'd have to say you're wrong. After all, now that the St. Louis thread has been bumped back up, it's really easy to find out what Quaker's opinion is of loud thugs taking over areas in order to protest perceived slights. And, of course, you wouldn't expect him to have contradictory values, where he flip-flops his opinion based on minor details, now, would you?Automatik;1781165 wrote:So am I wrong or not?