ZWICK 4 PREZ;1815463 wrote:You mean the same Rasmussen that had Romney up every time? Yeah I'm sure they're terrified.

You need to start giving him credit. The way things are right now, it's taking more and more work to find polls that give Trump any advantage, so he is one diligent mofo!

Heretic;1815471 wrote:You need to start giving him credit. The way things are right now, it's taking more and more work to find polls that give Trump any advantage, so he is one diligent mofo!

Nah.. Drudge does that work for him.

Fab4Runner;1815452 wrote:You said he was discussing sexual prowess. That is NOT what he was doing. He was discussing sexual assault.

I think we had this discussion a few months back about a bachelorette party
But then again that was just chatter

Belly35;1815474 wrote:I think we had this discussion a few months back about a bachelorette party
But then again that was just chatter

I'll admit I vaguely remember her thread, but I def don't recall sexual assault in it.

Belly35;1815474 wrote:I think we had this discussion a few months back about a bachelorette party
But then again that was just chatter

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1815476 wrote:I'll admit I vaguely remember her thread, but I def don't recall sexual assault in it.

Yes, please tell me where I said it was okay to grab a woman by her ***** and do whatever you want to her.

Lol, I just went back to that thread and it mainly seemed to be a hypothetical "is this cool" as far as consenting to sexual activities at your bachelor/bachelorette party. With Fab (the person criticizing Trump's "grab dat p*ssy" comment) saying she wouldn't personally do it but heard about it on the radio and was looking for opinions.

So Belly played the "grab at straws" game and failed. To no one's great surprise.

I'm surprised people still defend Donald Trump.

He is, without a doubt, THE worst Presidential Candidate EVER. He's so bad that HRC is actually the preferable alternative.

sleeper;1815480 wrote:I'm surprised people still defend Donald Trump.

He is, without a doubt, THE worst Presidential Candidate EVER. He's so bad that HRC is actually the preferable alternative.

It's easy; I look at the HRC supporters - you, zwick, Herectic, the Kardashians, Barack, etc and I choose to side with the opposite. Because when in my life did I wish to be grouped in with anyone on that list?

bases_loaded;1815481 wrote:It's easy; I look at the HRC supporters - you, zwick, Herectic, the Kardashians, Barack, etc and I choose to side with the opposite. Because when in my life did I wish to be grouped in with anyone on that list?

KKK endorsed Trump. Good to know where you stand.

Also, besides Zwick/Heretic, all of those people have more money than you do. Enjoy!

sleeper;1815482 wrote:KKK endorsed Trump. Good to know where you stand.

Also, besides Zwick/Heretic, all of those people have more money than you do. Enjoy!

Anyway, I'd be willing to be an absurd amount of cash that Trump supporters are negatively correlated with wealth, education level, and IQ value.

That's certainly not how I would make decisions but if you want to play that game, that's a game you're going to lose 10/10 with Trump.

Wikileaks continues to expose her as the most corrupt person in the world today; this weeks dumps are simply staggering. It also proves the massive corruption in the media ---- beyond belief. No wonder they in hysterics, at long last being exposed.

QuakerOats;1815486 wrote:Wikileaks continues to expose her as the most corrupt person in the world today; this weeks dumps are simply staggering. It also proves the massive corruption in the media ---- beyond belief. No wonder they in hysterics, at long last being exposed.

Trump!

sleeper;1815484 wrote:Anyway, I'd be willing to be an absurd amount of cash that Trump supporters are negatively correlated with wealth, education level, and IQ value.

That's certainly not how I would make decisions but if you want to play that game, that's a game you're going to lose 10/10 with Trump.

"uninformed and compliant"; she has you right where she wants you.

QuakerOats;1815488 wrote:"uninformed and compliant"; she has you right where she wants you.

I'm well aware of her flaws and she still has my vote. The fact that I think lowly of her and still will give her my vote tells you all you need to know of what I think about Trump.

bases_loaded;1815481 wrote:It's easy; I look at the HRC supporters - you, zwick, Herectic, the Kardashians, Barack, etc and I choose to side with the opposite. Because when in my life did I wish to be grouped in with anyone on that list?

???

I've spoken more about voting 3rd party than anything else. I just get annoyed by all the full retard Trumpsters like you who are completely blind to how he's failing and try to point fingers everywhere except him. I mean, I shouldn't expect anything better from people like you and CC, who are essentially Isadore with fewer words per post, but still...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/13/emails-reveal-clinton-camp-s-scramble-to-craft-defend-server-story.html

the web we weave when we first set out to deceive ............

Heretic;1815490 wrote:???

I've spoken more about voting 3rd party than anything else. I just get annoyed by all the full retard Trumpsters like you who are completely blind to how he's failing and try to point fingers everywhere except him. I mean, I shouldn't expect anything better from people like you and CC, who are essentially Isadore with fewer words per post, but still...

Yeah I would say you have been slightly left moderate this election cycle. You definitely have made it clear how pathetic both candidates are.

Spock;1814821 wrote:The main stream media today has reached a new low. Not one mention of the email dump. Just dumping on trump. He is basically running against HC, the media and half his party. He is the perfect candidate of all that trashbdislikes him.

Serious questions:
- Were you this up in arms about Bush/Cheney deleting 22 million emails, while Bush was the actual president, from a private server? Apparently Bush and Cheney didn't care about classified information or using private emails either. Based on how upset you are at Clinton, I would assume you were leading the charge to impeach Bush. Am I correct? http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/missing-white-house-emails

Commander of Awesome;1815505 wrote:Serious questions:
- Were you this up in arms about Bush/Cheney deleting 22 million emails, while Bush was the actual president, from a private server? Apparently Bush and Cheney didn't care about classified information or using private emails either. Based on how upset you are at Clinton, I would assume you were leading the charge to impeach Bush. Am I correct? http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/missing-white-house-emails

While I think you calling into question if the level of outrage was the same is fair, what I don't like about this argument or the "Well Bill Clinton assaulted women!!!" argument is neither have anything to do with the people running today. HRC's use of a private server isn't made less wrong by GWB using one. Trump being an absolute creep in terms of how he views women (or basically anyone not a straight white male) isn't made less gross because Bill was banging anything on two legs. Cliche aside, two wrongs don't make right.

I think the fact that both sides are going so deep in the well for the "well yea my guy/gal did this but what the (insert other person/party/whatever here) did was just as bad if not worse!!!" arguments just goes to show how unbelievably terrible each major party candidate is. Neither can make an argument for themselves the only argument is "well I'm not the other" To quote Trump, "Sad"

Heretic;1815490 wrote:???

I've spoken more about voting 3rd party than anything else. I just get annoyed by all the full retard Trumpsters like you who are completely blind to how he's failing and try to point fingers everywhere except him. I mean, I shouldn't expect anything better from people like you and CC, who are essentially Isadore with fewer words per post, but still...

Oh you don't like being lumped in with every piece of shit? Awfully quick to lump others though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sleeper;1815482 wrote:KKK endorsed Trump. Good to know where you stand.

Also, besides Zwick/Heretic, all of those people have more money than you do. Enjoy!

Of course they did and I have no idea what you make but it's pretty obvious you are a miserable human being if the only happiness you have in life relies on telling people how successful and smart you are on a dying message board.

Commander of Awesome;1815505 wrote:Serious questions:
- Were you this up in arms about Bush/Cheney deleting 22 million emails, while Bush was the actual president, from a private server? Apparently Bush and Cheney didn't care about classified information or using private emails either. Based on how upset you are at Clinton, I would assume you were leading the charge to impeach Bush. Am I correct? http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/missing-white-house-emails

They are all on the same team. No surprise.

bases_loaded;1815509 wrote:Of course they did and I have no idea what you make but it's pretty obvious you are a miserable human being if the only happiness you have in life relies on telling people how successful and smart you are on a dying message board.

So is the KKK a group you'd like to be associated with given that's how you make choices on who to vote for in the election?

Yes; Trump asked for the endorsement and they gave it; he also asked for endorsements from the Nazi's, the brownshirts, North Koreans, and Iran.