Go to town?
Fab4Runner;1815213 wrote:Looks like women disagree with you, Quaker.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-women-are-defeating-donald-trump/
I've been saying all along that other than straight, white men...who is going to vote for Donald Trump? Not women, not minorities, not gays. Straight white dudes. There are a lot of you, but not enough.
O-Trap;1815177 wrote:Sleeper mentioned that justices would "uphold" the rights of women. That can be the current ones. It doesn't necessitate any special rights bestowed, which is what your comment stated (see below).
But why is she better? Because Trump is an asshole? If he was really that bad, wouldn't we have something more than, he said bad things or called a fat chick fat?SportsAndLady;1815225 wrote:Go to town?
What exactly is all of this proving? That she's a corrupt politician? Everyone in the United States knows that. And she's still going to win in a landslide.
I'm not sure why you and QO are constantly posting links to Hillary being corrupt, or being caught in a lie, or taking money from someone. We already know what she is. And guess what? It's STILL better than Donald fucking Trump.
She's better because she understands how the world works, particularly how to deal with foreign leaders. She also understands the US nuclear policy and the NATO alliance.bases_loaded;1815232 wrote:But why is she better? Because Trump is an asshole? If he was really that bad, wouldn't we have something more than, he said bad things or called a fat chick fat?
Yeah, she really knows how the world works; everything she has touched is burning.sleeper;1815236 wrote:She's better because she understands how the world works, particularly how to deal with foreign leaders. She also understands the US nuclear policy and the NATO alliance.
This could be said of any politician in history. The world is a complex place and few things get "solved" - it doesn't work like that. For example, the Middle East has been a simmering pot of hate and war for thousands of years. To think any American politician, regardless of party affiliation, has "caused" or "solved" it is preposterous.QuakerOats;1815248 wrote:everything she has touched is burning.
???bases_loaded;1815241 wrote:The only thing Hillary has proven was she could bolster our enemies by exchanging weapons for cash. White trash to Millionaire without working a day in her life. No thanks.
The hyperbole is real. You support a candidate who wants to arm South Korea and Japan with nuclear weapons and thinks NATO involvement is conditional.QuakerOats;1815248 wrote:Yeah, she really knows how the world works; everything she has touched is burning.
But as long as she keeps you "uninformed and compliant", she's got you.
Congrats.
Sounds more like a Breitbart thing, where they simply say outlandish stuff because their readership will believe ANYTHING.sleeper;1815266 wrote:???
Where is this coming from? Was this on Fox News?
A couple things.QuakerOats;1815227 wrote:I posted the evidence previously on at least two occasions, O-Trap, specifically from the Youngstown Vindicator in the case of Mahoning County.
Good luck.
He didn't imply that they have their own rights. He implied that they have rights. If I say that you have rights, I'm not saying you have your own rights. If I say white people have rights, I'm not saying only white people have rights. If I'm saying foreign-born citizens have rights, I'm not saying only foreign-born citizens have rights.QuakerOats;1815228 wrote:Sleeper implied that women have their own rights and that they need to be upheld. False premise etc.... The justices are charged with protecting the rights bestowed upon all Americans by our Creator and shielded from BIG GOVERNMENT overreach by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Heretic;1815274 wrote:Sounds more like a Breitbart thing, where they simply say outlandish stuff because their readership will believe ANYTHING.
sleeper;1815267 wrote:The hyperbole is real. You support a candidate who wants to arm South Korea and Japan with nuclear weapons and thinks NATO involvement is conditional.
Nice words though! I for one am ready for our First Female President and her ultra liberal SCOTUS judges. Are you?
QuakerOats;1813586 wrote:
Who dat?
QuakerOats;1815285 wrote:Hillary will not acknowledge stepson .............racist bigot
CNN ORDERS BLACKOUT ON CLINTON 'SON'
DANNEY LIVE INTERVIEW
HILLARY IGNORES HIM
LOL
In Obama’s second term, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton authorized the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood, and friendly to the Libyan rebels, in an effort to topple the Libyan/Gaddafi government, and then ship those arms to Syria in order to fund Al Qaeda, and topple Assad in Syria.sleeper;1815266 wrote:???
Where is this coming from? Was this on Fox News?
Actually, it wasn't as it turns out, according to Drudge itself the other day.rocketalum;1815292 wrote:The very same Drudge Report deemed this report "a cruel hoax by the mother" and "debunked and flunked by science" in a 1999 issue.
[FONT=&]The DRUDGE REPORT has learned that 13-year old Danny Williams is now dealing with the news that Bill Clinton is not his father.[/FONT][FONT=&]"Danny is holding up fine ... doing quite well," a source close to the situation in Arkansas explained on Saturday.[/FONT][FONT=&]"For him, this was always just a search for the truth," the source added.[/FONT][FONT=&]In what now must be viewed as a cruel hoax by the boy's mother — Bobbie Ann Williams even gave a paid interview to PARAMOUNT's HARD COPY detailing her "relationship" with Bill Clinton — the story of sex for money that ended in pregnancy itself, in the end, was debunked and flunked by science.[/FONT]
bases_loaded;1815294 wrote:In Obama’s second term, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton authorized the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood, and friendly to the Libyan rebels, in an effort to topple the Libyan/Gaddafi government, and then ship those arms to Syria in order to fund Al Qaeda, and topple Assad in Syria.
Clinton took the lead role in organizing the so-called “Friends of Syria” (aka Al Qaeda/ISIS) to back the CIA-led insurgency for regime change in Syria.
Under oath Hillary Clinton denied she knew about the weapons shipments during public testimony in early 2013 after the Benghazi terrorist attack.
In an interview with Democracy Now, Wikileaks’ Julian Assange is now stating that 1,700 emails contained in the Clinton cache directly connect Hillary to Libya to Syria, and directly to Al Qaeda and ISIS.
I actually applaud the GOP for coming out against Trump. I would be more pissed if they just blindly backed him because republican.rocketalum;1815276 wrote:I'm totally fascinated by the possible fallout from this election (poli sci undergrad here). Trump has awoken and mobilized a population so large that the GOP cannot survive without it on the national stage. We could be on the verge of something rather historic in our two party system. As we've seen this week the GOP brass is actively pushing away Trump and by default his supporters. Does the GOP fracture as a result? The coalition of big business republicans, social conservatives, fiscal conservatives and this nationalist bunch Trump has brought to light seems untenable going forward.
As an aside, While I'm not at all excited about waking up on November 9th to a Hillary Presidency, I am at like Christmas morning excitement level for waking up to the absolute shitshow of tears, blame, and excuses the Trump supporters will be.
