QuakerOats;1814671 wrote:Lol --- he didn't just win; he buried her, and he didn't he use half the bullets he could have.

QuakerOats;1814671 wrote:Lol --- he didn't just win; he buried her, and he didn't he use half the bullets he could have.

Fab4Runner;1814674 wrote:Like I said, the only people I know who claim he won are dumb, uneducated hillbillies who think delivering one liners makes you qualified to be POTUS. Every smart, rational person I know agrees that he is an embarrassment and didn't answer any of the questions in a thoughtful, coherent way.

QuakerOats;1814678 wrote:... that are being objective in their evaluations ...

QuakerOats;1814678 wrote:The people I have talked to today are not dumb, nor uneducated, nor hillbillies. They agree he walloped her; they also agree he did poorly in the first debate. These are educated, professional people that are being objective in their evaluations. I myself started watching the debate thinking this could go downhill quickly and maybe be the end; but amazingly he didn't just turn it around, he won going away.

Obviously he is far from the best choice, but he is right on the top issues that are critical to our future, and she is dead wrong on them. Beyond that, it is appalling that anyone could support her (especially females) given her personal orchestration in the demonizing and destruction of victims of sexual assault (committed by her husband) in order protect and expand their political ambitions. I am utterly flabbergasted that anyone could support such complicit criminal behavior, especially women.

QuakerOats;1814678 wrote:The people I have talked to today are not dumb, nor uneducated, nor hillbillies. They agree he walloped her; they also agree he did poorly in the first debate. These are educated, professional people that are being objective in their evaluations. I myself started watching the debate thinking this could go downhill quickly and maybe be the end; but amazingly he didn't just turn it around, he won going away.

Obviously he is far from the best choice, but he is right on the top issues that are critical to our future, and she is dead wrong on them. Beyond that, it is appalling that anyone could support her (especially females) given her personal orchestration in the demonizing and destruction of victims of sexual assault (committed by her husband) in order protect and expand their political ambitions. I am utterly flabbergasted that anyone could support such complicit criminal behavior, especially women.

like_that;1814652 wrote:Barstool has been running with this, and it brings the lulz.

Spock;1814694 wrote:HC looks more like a criminal this morning then ever. Trump game plan worked bigly.


So is Wiki still have a few more document dumps?

like_that;1814697 wrote:To answer cc's poorly written question, yes. Wikileaks just dumped 2K more emails from Clinton's campaign team a couple hours ago.

Fab4Runner;1814681 wrote:Donald Trump has ACTUALLY ASSAULTED WOMEN.

like_that;1814690 wrote:http://www.barstoolsports.com/newyork/top-5-most-important-revelations-from-ken-bones-radio-appearance-this-morning/?utm_campaign=SocialflowFB&utm_source=BarstoolFB&utm_medium=Socialflow

[emoji23]

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1814680 wrote:I made a post about how both candidates are bad and both parties messed up and a friend from high school let me know that I was sexist b/c I preferred Bernie or Biden over Clinton and Hillary isn't anymore corrupt than Bernie or Biden, men just don't go after them like they do Hillary.

Spock;1814694 wrote:... bigly ...

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1814695 wrote:Yes, Belly. Wiki still are got some dumps for yet now.

O-Trap;1814679 wrote:Were any of these people voting for Clinton before this debate? If not, I'm not sure I trust this part of your assessment of their reasoning.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1814680 wrote:I was just SJW'd on facebook lol ouch.

I made a post about how both candidates are bad and both parties messed up and a friend from high school let me know that I was sexist b/c I preferred Bernie or Biden over Clinton and Hillary isn't anymore corrupt than Bernie or Biden, men just don't go after them like they do Hillary.

QuakerOats;1814708 wrote:No, they are smart people who care about the direction we are headed. They can be relied upon as objective because they thought he did poorly in the first debate, and he did. If they were in-the-tank surrogates they would not have said he did poorly in the first debate. But it is clear he won the second debate by laying out her decades-long failures as a career politician, pointing out her criminal behavior, and delving in to the facts of her despicable behavior of destroying and threatening victims of abuse ..............not to mention the policy issues that were discussed from obamaKare to the supreme court to taxes etc..etc..

QuakerOats;1814708 wrote:No, they are smart people who care about the direction we are headed. They can be relied upon as objective because they thought he did poorly in the first debate, and he did. If they were in-the-tank surrogates they would not have said he did poorly in the first debate. But it is clear he won the second debate by laying out her decades-long failures as a career politician, pointing out her criminal behavior, and delving in to the facts of her despicable behavior of destroying and threatening victims of abuse ..............not to mention the policy issues that were discussed from obamaKare to the supreme court to taxes etc..etc..

QuakerOats;1814708 wrote:But it is clear he won the second debate by laying out her decades-long failures as a career politician, pointing out her criminal behavior, and delving in to the facts of her despicable behavior of destroying and threatening victims of abuse ..............not to mention the policy issues that were discussed from obamaKare to the supreme court to taxes etc..etc..

queencitybuckeye;1814726 wrote:Incorrect. The winner of the debate is measured in votes. Clinton's lead increased after the first debate. That means she won. The "winner" of the second will mean less than the shift from *****-gate.