Noslingshot4ever;1793195 wrote:Bradford demands trade...any interest in him?
ThisSonofanump;1793229 wrote:$36M for 2 years, umm, who wants that?
Noslingshot4ever;1793195 wrote:Bradford demands trade...any interest in him?
ThisSonofanump;1793229 wrote:$36M for 2 years, umm, who wants that?
I was wondering where he might go, maybe early 4th round.Benny The Jet;1793544 wrote:Any chance Browns take a chance on Jaylon Smith with 1 of their 3rds? Not like we're in championship mode right now, he could pan out to be a steal IF he can come back healthy in '17.
Fuck that noise. Trich all over again. If these guys are truly analytical guys they won't draft a rb in the first round. Hopefully they are trying to gain interest for zeke to trade down again.SportsAndLady;1793560 wrote:I'm seeing a lot of buzz about the Browns taking Zeke Elliot. Not sure I would like that at all but it would at least give us a playmaker on offense (if he pans out). We'll see
Agree 100% here, no thanks on Smith.SportsAndLady;1793559 wrote:I doubt smith will ever be as good as he once was. I'd pass on him. Yes we have extra picks but we didn't make trades to get extra picks to make on huge question mark players like smith.
He'll go to the patriots or some team that can afford a boom or bust pick.
Agree 100% with this as well. No fucking thanks. I'm prob in the minority, but I think Crow/Duke is a pretty solid 1-2 combo. Remember how Duke would have a big 1st halfonly to disappear in the 2nd? Hopefully Jackson doesn't allow that BS to continue.like_that;1793562 wrote:Fuck that noise. Trich all over again. If these guys are truly analytical guys they won't draft a rb in the first round. Hopefully they are trying to gain interest for zeke to trade down again.
I like Zeke but not as our #1 pick unless we trade down into the late 20's and he's still there(he won't be).SportsAndLady;1793560 wrote:I'm seeing a lot of buzz about the Browns taking Zeke Elliot. Not sure I would like that at all but it would at least give us a playmaker on offense (if he pans out). We'll see
This. No thanks on Smith.SportsAndLady;1793559 wrote:I doubt smith will ever be as good as he once was. I'd pass on him. Yes we have extra picks but we didn't make trades to get extra picks to make on huge question mark players like smith.
He'll go to the patriots or some team that can afford a boom or bust pick.
Even then I say fuck that.sleeper;1793565 wrote:I like Zeke but not as our #1 pick unless we trade down into the late 20's and he's still there(he won't be).
This, maybe late 2nd.like_that;1793577 wrote:Even then I say fuck that.
http://archive.advancedfootballanalytics.com/2008/04/drafting-rbs.htmlSportsAndLady;1793580 wrote:An analytics guy might look at the Todd Gurley pick by St. Louis last year and think it was a very good pick and good value to get the offensive ROY at 8.
I'm not saying I agree with it, but from an analytics standpoint I could see Zeke being an option.
I feel like this is correct. The dolphins want him pretty bad I guess...could be trying to trade with us to grab him.like_that;1793562 wrote:Fuck that noise. Trich all over again. If these guys are truly analytical guys they won't draft a rb in the first round. Hopefully they are trying to gain interest for zeke to trade down again.
Actually no, I would say getting a solid LT for 12 yrs is better than a RB for 3.Azubuike24;1793585 wrote:Long-term investment wise, you would have to think the numbers favor never taking a RB in RD1. Even if you get a top 5 RB for 3-5 years, is it better than taking a solid LT for 12-15 years? An argument could be made for the latter regardless of the talent.
I think that is what he was saying.Commander of Awesome;1793596 wrote:Actually no, I would say getting a solid LT for 12 yrs is better than a RB for 3.
Oh you're right. Misread. Disregard my post.SportsAndLady;1793597 wrote:I think that is what he was saying.
Agreed and it's not like he is some bum with a bad work ethic. The dude is one of the hardest working players you will find. There is no doubt he will come back from this injury nearly 100% it's not a matter of if but when. It could be this year, next year, 2 years from now.Laley23;1793600 wrote:Smith was a consensus top 10 player in this draft (many had top 5). Formerly #1 player in the country as a HSer. I would take him in the 3rd at some point. Worth it, IMO.
But he might not be there. Schefter Tweeted today Smith could go as high as 2nd round and doubts he lasts past the 3rd.
Lol there's no way you can say with 100% certainty that someone will be able to fully recover from a severe knee injury with bad nerve damage.Crimson streak;1793645 wrote:Agreed and it's not like he is some bum with a bad work ethic. The dude is one of the hardest working players you will find. There is no doubt he will come back from this injury nearly 100% it's not a matter of if but when. It could be this year, next year, 2 years from now.