sleeper;1792011 wrote:I'm not going to do the search now. I do remember being the only one on here against Manziel from Day 1, even before the Browns drafted him.

like_that;1792014 wrote:I am just going to quote this post just in case you decide to delete this. Even you know this isn't your best effort at bullshitting.

sleeper;1792021 wrote:???

Feel free to dig through my posts and find a single one that doesn't call Manziel a piece of trash worthy of a spot in the NFL.

Automatik;1792025 wrote:You've been the extreme opposite of FW regarding Manziel this entire time. I remember you blasting Cleveland for the pick.

like_that;1792026 wrote:I am not disputing that. You claimed you were laughed at. This is 100% bullshit. Outside of footwedge and Iqqy nobody was bullish on Jff.

like_that;1792006 wrote:Link to you being laughed at?

sleeper;1792031 wrote:http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?44451-Random-Draft-Talk/page4&highlight=Browns

There's a lot of good shit in this thread.

You can summarize this entire thread with the phrase "sleeper is always right".

Edit: Maybe people weren't directly saying Manziel was going to win Super Bowls, but a lot of people were hedging their bets by not taking a position. Only dlazz and I really went hard after Manziel as being straight garbage. That takes balls.

sleeper;1792037 wrote:Pretty incredible that two of the posters calling me out are the same ones who hedged their bets on JFF. Going through and reading some of the historical threads you can see the trend quite clearly:

Sleeper = "Manziel sucks, will never win anything, is garbage, trash, terrible"
Everyone else "Manziel could be really good!"

LOL

like_that;1792042 wrote:Now you're changing your tune. First everyone laughed at you and now everyone was hedging their bets.

The irony here is you are currently hedging your argument LOL.

Thanks for proving my point.

sleeper;1792044 wrote:Sorry for not sifting through 1000's of pages of internet threads to find more evidence.

The reality is, I have been 100% correct on every Cleveland QB ever drafted with no hedging of my bets. I am the only poster who consistently makes predictions that end up being correct more often than not. Let me know when you grow some balls and start giving an actual opinion instead of just flailing around like a fish out of water.

like_that;1792048 wrote:I am not disputing you were correct. I even congratulated you. I am just looking for everyone laughing at you.

sleeper;1792044 wrote:Sorry for not sifting through 1000's of pages of internet threads to find more evidence.

The reality is, I have been 100% correct on every Cleveland QB ever drafted with no hedging of my bets. I am the only poster who consistently makes predictions that end up being correct more often than not. Let me know when you grow some balls and start giving an actual opinion instead of just flailing around like a fish out of water.

Automatik;1791994 wrote:Something new? Or are you referring to the Rosenhaus statement?

Heretic;1791997 wrote:News story today about how he rented an expensive house in LA (over last weekend, I think, but can't remember the timeline) and he and his friends wrecked the place. Owner came back at 2 p.m. (they were supposed to have left the premises by noon, as per the agreement) and Manziel was passed out on a couch, there was evidence of cocaine all over the place, a bag of shrooms and, as said, the house was wrecked.

Another day in the life, in other words.

SportsAndLady;1792317 wrote:http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/15270927/cleveland-browns-trade-talks-involving-no-2-overall-pick-nfl-draft-uncertain-whether-make-trade

A) I don't even know why this article was written. There's literally no substance in there.

B) yay. Can't wait to trade the pick for an extra late round first and a couple 2nd and 3rd round picks. #Superbowl

sleeper;1792322 wrote:I think its telling you the QB the Rams want is also the one the Browns want. I'm okay with dropping back here provided we get a strong cache of picks similar to what the Titans got. I really don't think, outside of QB, there's a position the Browns need to draft at #2 that would make this team competitive over night. Maybe an OL to replace Thomas but if that's the case, Thomas needs to be moved.

Benny The Jet;1792372 wrote:Just got an notification on phone that Browns "better than 50% chance to trade #2 pick. Eagles want deal done today". Think it was bleacher report. Rumor is its 1st and 3rd this and next year

Benny The Jet;1792372 wrote:Just got an notification on phone that Browns "better than 50% chance to trade #2 pick. Eagles want deal done today". Think it was bleacher report. Rumor is its 1st and 3rd this and next year