SportsAndLady;1833449 wrote:Seeing a few mocks this morning with the Browns taking M Garrett at 1 and then Dalvin Cook, the RB out of fsu, at 12

SportsAndLady;1833449 wrote:Seeing a few mocks this morning with the Browns taking M Garrett at 1 and then Dalvin Cook, the RB out of fsu, at 12.

I'm not a big believer in RBs this early in drafts..but we do need some explosiveness in our offense and cook can catch out of the backfield (a must have in today's NFL). I'd be okay with those two picks.

Sonofanump;1833470 wrote:Running backs have a shelf life of ~5 years. Running back are productive from day 1. Running backs are the last piece of the puzzle that a team adds. No need for a running back for a 1-15 team, use what you have until you are ready at every other position.

SportsAndLady;1833485 wrote:A RB can change your offense if you have a really good one. Especially if you don't have an elite QB. We don't have an elite QB and because we'll be taking a QB in the 2nd-3rd round (again), we'll continue to have a shaky offense. A RB can at least help the offense.

But you're right COA, we should draft another lineman. That'll really help our problems. We'll be 6-10, but damnit PFT will grade our O and D line in the top half of the league!! Winner!!

sleeper;1833476 wrote:Although I think that Cook is the best RB in the draft, I do not want him with the #12 pick. I'd like the Browns to try to get Malik Hooker and if he's going to be gone, I'd trade up to get him. If that isn't possible, I like Wilson from Florida.

I do not want anything to do with Jabril Peppers.

I agree with the #1 overall pick though.

Commander of Awesome;1833512 wrote:Then why in the fuck wouldn't you draft a defensive player numbnuts? Our defense was bottom of the league, but you want to waste a 1st on a fucking RB when we got 2 good ones already? LMAO

SportsAndLady;1833519 wrote:Lol yeah, Crowell and Duke Johnson. RBs that strike fear in defensive coordinators! Lol

Crimson streak;1833550 wrote:Crow is probably one of the most underrated rb's in the league. I'm definitely cool rolling with crow. We need defenseive talent and o line help. And qb. All could easily be filled this offseason with the draft and FA


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sonofanump;1833602 wrote:Hot take news flash: 2017 does not matter either. 3-13 at best. 2-3 years away from securing the RB of the future.

Crimson streak;1833639 wrote:This I disagree with. Depending on the draft and FA signings I think we are going to be a lot better than people think. I could see a 6-7 win season


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SportsAndLady;1833643 wrote:Need to see who our QB is going to be before predicting win totals.

SportsAndLady;1833643 wrote:Need to see who our QB is going to be before predicting win totals.

Ironman92;1833647 wrote:Aaron Rodgers....how many wins if he was your QB next year?

Andrew Luck?

Carson Wentz?

Crimson streak;1833646 wrote:Oh I agree 100%. The biggest difference we will see is the defense. The front 7 has the potential to be very very good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SportsAndLady;1833648 wrote:11 wins with Rodgers.
9 wins with Luck.

Not sure on Wentz. Second year is a big year for qbs. He's either going to be very good next year or regress.

Ironman92;1833651 wrote:So you believe next year Browns minus a QB will be better than this year's Packers and Colts without considering QB?

SportsAndLady;1833652 wrote:I think the Browns would win 11 games with Aaron Rodgers at QB. And 9 games with Luck as QB.

Benny The Jet;1833657 wrote:Rodgers alone isn't worth 10 more wins.