2016 Browns Season Thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2016 Browns Season Thread
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 9, 2017 7:46 PM
I really hate when I say something on here, and then Classy says almost the exact same thing.

Really makes me question my existence.
Jan 9, 2017 7:46pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 9, 2017 7:53 PM
SportsAndLady;1832042 wrote:It was also his rookie year.

I'd trade our entire trash roster for Carson Wentz.
Same for Kessler, who had a better statistical season (8 game comparison). Dont see you beating the drum to keep him as QB going forward.
Jan 9, 2017 7:53pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 9, 2017 8:01 PM
Commander of Awesome;1832053 wrote:Same for Kessler, who had a better statistical season (8 game comparison). Dont see you beating the drum to keep him as QB going forward.
Would love to keep Kessler, he'd make a great NFL backup for 10 years!
Jan 9, 2017 8:01pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 9, 2017 8:56 PM
SportsAndLady;1832054 wrote:Would love to keep Kessler, he'd make a great NFL backup for 10 years!
lol
Jan 9, 2017 8:56pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 9, 2017 9:38 PM
Classyposter58;1832048 wrote:Browns fans are so unbelievably dumb and this thread shows it. You. Need. A. Quarterback.

Cleveland in that division will never make the playoffs until it gets one. Look at Oakland, they get David Carr and the turnaround happened fast. Denver has pretty much everything back from a SB team yet because they had no QB they miss the postseason entirely
You need a QB in the NFL?!?!?!

Jan 9, 2017 9:38pm
imex99's avatar

imex99

Senior Member

4,927 posts
Jan 10, 2017 12:23 AM
So, do they take Watson?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jan 10, 2017 12:23am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 10, 2017 12:26 AM
imex99;1832151 wrote:So, do they take Watson?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hope not.

Does this mean that Clemson could beat the Browns? lolololol
Jan 10, 2017 12:26am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 10, 2017 8:01 AM
imex99;1832151 wrote:So, do they take Watson?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd take Kizer over Watson--just seems to have more of an upside
Jan 10, 2017 8:01am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 10, 2017 8:17 AM
No thanks on Watson
Jan 10, 2017 8:17am
Benny The Jet's avatar

Benny The Jet

Senior Member

2,987 posts
Jan 10, 2017 8:50 AM
SportsAndLady;1832183 wrote:No thanks on Watson
This. The Watson you saw in the first half will most likely be the Watson you'll see in the NFL. Missing open open receivers and looking flustered.
Jan 10, 2017 8:50am
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Jan 10, 2017 9:09 AM
Watson was god awful against the blitz and always has been. his receivers bailed him out a lot the last 2 drives. No thanks. That's exactly why I'm high on Kizer. He has very good numbers against the blitz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jan 10, 2017 9:09am
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Jan 10, 2017 9:15 AM
I'm actually hoping some dumbass team like the jets or niners take Watson in the top 5 and Kizer or trubisky falls in our lap at 12


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jan 10, 2017 9:15am
iclfan2's avatar

iclfan2

Reppin' the 330/216/843

6,360 posts
Jan 10, 2017 9:27 AM
Don't like Watson's size. Do not want.
Jan 10, 2017 9:27am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 10, 2017 9:33 AM
Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.

Great college QB though
Jan 10, 2017 9:33am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 10, 2017 12:30 PM
Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.
This, never impressed with him. Not to go all sleeper here, but I wouldn't take him in the 3rd round.
Jan 10, 2017 12:30pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 10, 2017 1:12 PM
Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.

Great college QB though
This is eerily similar to what I said when the Browns selected Manziel..."is Mike Evans coming with him?"
Jan 10, 2017 1:12pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 10, 2017 1:14 PM
SportsAndLady;1832183 wrote:No thanks on Watson
Benny The Jet;1832187 wrote:This. The Watson you saw in the first half will most likely be the Watson you'll see in the NFL. Missing open open receivers and looking flustered.
Crimson streak;1832189 wrote:Watson was god awful against the blitz and always has been. his receivers bailed him out a lot the last 2 drives. No thanks. That's exactly why I'm high on Kizer. He has very good numbers against the blitz


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Crimson streak;1832191 wrote:I'm actually hoping some dumbass team like the jets or niners take Watson in the top 5 and Kizer or trubisky falls in our lap at 12


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
iclfan2;1832192 wrote:Don't like Watson's size. Do not want.
Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.

Great college QB though
Commander of Awesome;1832212 wrote:This, never impressed with him. Not to go all sleeper here, but I wouldn't take him in the 3rd round.
these
Jan 10, 2017 1:14pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jan 10, 2017 3:54 PM
Watson's beat feature is his grit and toughness.....he'll probably last longer and be better than we expect....but he won't be a very good QB for long, if any. Great college QB
Jan 10, 2017 3:54pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jan 10, 2017 5:40 PM
Buddy just sent me this, it brings teh lulz

[video=youtube;f2GMcjNyAyI][/video]

#CroKno U A Bitch lol
Jan 10, 2017 5:40pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Jan 10, 2017 8:43 PM
Commander of Awesome;1832254 wrote:Buddy just sent me this, it brings teh lulz

[video=youtube;f2GMcjNyAyI][/video]

#CroKno U A Bitch lol
I forgot about that video, shit kills me every time lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jan 10, 2017 8:43pm
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
Jan 10, 2017 10:26 PM
Give me the UNC QB
Jan 10, 2017 10:26pm
Benny The Jet's avatar

Benny The Jet

Senior Member

2,987 posts
Jan 11, 2017 11:43 AM
slingshot4ever;1832278 wrote:Give me the UNC QB
Drafted in the 20's/2nd round? Sure. Or were you wanting to spend the 1st or 12th on him?
Jan 11, 2017 11:43am
S

Sonofanump

Jan 11, 2017 12:10 PM
Benny The Jet;1832341 wrote:12th on him?
I'd be OK with that.
Jan 11, 2017 12:10pm
Benny The Jet's avatar

Benny The Jet

Senior Member

2,987 posts
Jan 11, 2017 12:20 PM
I really don't see 1 QB worth a 1st or 12th pick for. I'd solidify the lines first and foremost. You could put Rodgers behind our line and he'd look like crap. Just my opinion.
Jan 11, 2017 12:20pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 11, 2017 12:25 PM
Benny The Jet;1832347 wrote:I really don't see 1 QB worth a 1st or 12th pick for. I'd solidify the lines first and foremost. You could put Rodgers behind our line and he'd look like crap. Just my opinion.
Hasn't Rodgers had a shitty line almost his entire career (outside of this year where they've been pretty good)? Including the year he won the super bowl?

That's a pretty asinine comment. If we get an elite QB, we don't NEED a Dallas Cowboys line to do well.

However, if we get a Dallas Cowboys line, we still need a decent QB to do well.

I'll take the QB at 1 or 12.
Jan 11, 2017 12:25pm