You keep pointing out #1 in saying it doesn't matter however that is entirely untrue. The Cavs had options for sign and trades with Love if they really didn't want him and that alone can provide flexibility in the roster and financially by having smaller easier to move contracts. There were other options, but the Cavs thought his previous season made him worth a max deal. They chose poorly.HighRoller74;1776628 wrote:1.) Cavs are over the cap with or without Love, 0 roster flexibility either way.
2.) If Love was a FA there would be a line of teams willing to give him the same contract he has right now, this past off-season proves that.
3.) Cavs do need to bring in another PF, James Jones can't play real minutes for this team.
4.) Team is deeper now with Love, than it would be with Wiggins which is my point.
And point #4 is entirely false. If we still had Wiggins we would have had significant cap savings since you also could make the assumption that we wouldn't have JR, Shumpert, or Movgoz(or Love). That alone is about $40M in savings without including the premium we paid on TT because of our weak negotiating position.