By the numbers Sandy Valley Sectional Seeds

Wrestling 4 replies 312 views
wraith51's avatar
wraith51
Posts: 386
Mar 11, 2015 2:04pm
With this year being a new system for seeding our wrestlers at the sectional level and going strictly by criteria and head to head matches only. I only did Sandy Valley only because that's where we wrestled and I at least know how their seed meeting went.

132 and 170 only had 4 seedable wrestlers and 120, 145, 152, and 182 only had 5 seedable wrestlers. All weight classes at this site had 7 or more wrestlers, Sandy Valley site only seeded out to the top 6. 138 was the deepest with 8 wrestlers with seedable criteria, there was a situation where the #7 beat #2 but split with #4 and #2 beat #4 in their only match-up and so on, so coaches voted to just keep that weight as is on the criteria sheet.

All #1 seeds finished in the top 2, all #2's finished in the top 3, all #3's finished in the top 5. Only 2 #4's did not place (138 being one of them), all #5's placed in the top 6, and only 2 #6's did not place.

Take note, if as the seeds got lower I eliminated certain placements (3 seed and below won't have 1st place listed since none placed 1st). The last chart is the seeds that did not place, all #1's and #2's placed so they were not included on the chart. The highest unseeded wrestler placed was 3rd.
1 seed 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
106 1 0 0 0
113 1 0 0 0
120 1 0 0 0
126 1 0 0 0
132 0 1 0 0
138 1 0 0 0
145 1 0 0 0
152 0 1 0 0
160 1 0 0 0
170 1 0 0 0
182 1 0 0 0
195 0 1 0 0
220 0 1 0 0
285 0 1 0 0
Total 9 5 0 0
2 seed 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
106 0 1 0 0
113 0 1 0 0
120 0 1 0 0
126 0 1 0 0
132 1 0 0 0
138 0 1 0 0
145 0 1 0 0
152 1 0 0 0
160 0 0 1 0
170 0 1 0 0
182 0 0 1 0
195 1 0 0 0
220 1 0 0 0
285 1 0 0 0
Total 5 7 2 0
wraith51's avatar
wraith51
Posts: 386
Mar 11, 2015 2:06pm
3 seed 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
106 0 0 0 1
113 0 1 0 0
120 0 1 0 0
126 0 0 1 0
132 0 1 0 0
138 0 0 0 1
145 0 1 0 0
152 0 1 0 0
160 1 0 0 0
170 0 1 0 0
182 1 0 0 0
195 0 0 0 1
220 0 0 0 1
285 0 1 0 0
Total 2 7 1 4
4 seed 3rd 4th 5th 6th
106 1 0 0 0
113 0 1 0 0
120 0 0 1 0
126 0 0 0 0
132 0 1 0 0
138 0 0 0 0
145 0 0 1 0
152 0 0 1 0
160 0 1 0 0
170 0 1 0 0
182 0 1 0 0
195 1 0 0 0
220 0 0 0 1
285 0 0 1 0
Total 2 5 4 1
wraith51's avatar
wraith51
Posts: 386
Mar 11, 2015 2:07pm
5 seed 3rd 4th 5th 6th
106 0 1 0 0
113 0 0 1 0
120 0 1 0 0
126 0 0 1 0
132 0 0 0 0
138 0 0 0 1
145 0 0 0 1
152 0 1 0 0
160 0 0 1 0
170 0 0 0 0
182 0 0 1 0
195 0 1 0 0
220 0 1 0 0
285 0 0 0 1
Total 0 5 4 3
6 seed 3rd 4th 5th 6th
106 0 0 0 1
113 0 0 0 1
120 0 0 0 0
126 0 0 0 1
132 0 0 0 0
138 0 0 0 0
145 0 0 0 0
152 0 0 0 0
160 0 0 0 0
170 0 0 0 0
182 0 0 0 0
195 0 0 0 1
220 1 0 0 0
285 0 1 0 0
Total 1 1 0 4
wraith51's avatar
wraith51
Posts: 386
Mar 11, 2015 2:08pm
unseeded 3rd 4th 5th 6th
106 0 0 0 0
113 0 0 0 0
120 0 0 0 1
126 1 0 0 0
132 0 0 1 1
138 1 1 0 0
145 0 1 0 0
152 0 0 0 1
160 0 0 0 1
170 0 0 1 1
182 0 0 0 1
195 0 0 0 0
220 0 0 0 0
285 0 0 0 0
Total 2 2 2 6
DNP 3 seed 4 seed 5 seed 6 seed
106 0 0 0 0
113 0 0 0 0
120 0 0 0 0
126 0 1 0 0
132 0 0 0 0
138 0 1 0 1
145 0 0 0 0
152 0 0 0 0
160 0 0 0 1
170 0 0 0 0
182 0 0 0 0
195 0 0 0 0
220 0 0 0 0
285 0 0 0 0
Total 0 2 0 2
B
boats19
Posts: 41
Mar 12, 2015 10:37am
Looks like the seeding criteria did it's job at that Sectional.