I want one of these!SportsAndLady;1788734 wrote:
So an ex/jilted lover of Bill all the sudden has some scandalous accusations on Hillary? I can't believe it! (oh, and I am NOT a Hillary fan).QuakerOats;1789353 wrote:http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hillary-had-several-abortions-kept-chelsea-for-political-appearances-bills-former-lover-says/
speaks for itself
What? That you're a gullible moron who believes everything you read if it supports your personal political stance?QuakerOats;1789353 wrote:http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hillary-had-several-abortions-kept-chelsea-for-political-appearances-bills-former-lover-says/
speaks for itself
Heretic;1789390 wrote:What? That you're a gullible moron who believes everything you read if it supports your personal political stance?
Obviously none of it is ruinous, especially for a clinton. It merely confirms that which you have alluded to above.jmog;1789357 wrote: Other than the lying/calculating political accusation (only had a kid for political reasons) adding to her legacy of deceit, I don't see anything in that article that ruins her, even if it is all true.
Secret service agents don't comment on active cases. That was a Trump lie. Also, if that were true, the secret service would have handled it, not her campaign manager. There has been a lot written up on this by the daily wire I think it's called.Apple;1789626 wrote:I heard a Secret Service agent at the event has said that she penetrated the Secret Service line, meaning she was wrong to have approached Trump in the manner she did.
There is video I've seen which shows him grabbing her and jerking her backwards, but obviously that isn't enough to prove the bruising came from that incident.iclfan2;1789612 wrote:"Erroneously"? He either grabbed her and left a bruise or didn't. I'm willing to bet he did, although I doubt it will be proven in court. Regardless, the guy shouldn't have touched her. But it is very interesting to see the Clinton connection.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry but you're wrong.iclfan2;1789651 wrote:Secret service agents don't comment on active cases. That was a Trump lie. Also, if that were true, the secret service would have handled it, not her campaign manager. There has been a lot written up on this by the daily wire I think it's called.
Ehh, there seems to be disagreement on the topic.superman;1789665 wrote:Sorry but you're wrong.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/29/secret-service-says-michelle-fields-touched-trump-before-lewandowski-intervened/
Not a Trump supporter at all but a hack from a third rate website trying to generate a story by grandstanding is not news worthy.iclfan2;1789668 wrote:Ehh, there seems to be disagreement on the topic.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/29/thefederalist-blog-challenges-daily-mail-to-name-secret-service-agent-quoted-in-lewandowski-story/
I don't really care about this story, other than the fact Trump has changed his tune on it 3 times now. He is a whiny little rich ass who says nothing of substance and whose entire platform is that he isn't establishment.
Apparently Comey is going to set up an interview with Hillary soon. He is known for being unbiased and professional. This interview will put it to test. You gotta assume this investigation is getting close to an end if they are processing interviews soon. Although a federal judge recently opening up more emails to be investigated could prolong the investigation.iclfan2;1789674 wrote:To get this thread back on track... How long can this investigation take? And if she were found guilty, how bad would that be for her? I guess what I mean is, if a guilty verdict would make her not fit to be president, how could anyone vote for her of the investigation is still ongoing in November?
Also, an interesting take below on how the clintons had been quiet for a long time until Bill came out and blasted Obama recently, and maybe it has to do with the fbi investigation.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/30/monica-crowley-the-clintons-sense-a-breakdown/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If someone is trying to get on state with a POTUS candidate that is not supposed to be on stage they most certainly SHOULD be "grabbed". I can't stand Trump but she was lucky it was just a "grab" and not a tackle.iclfan2;1789612 wrote:"Erroneously"? He either grabbed her and left a bruise or didn't. I'm willing to bet he did, although I doubt it will be proven in court. Regardless, the guy shouldn't have touched her. But it is very interesting to see the Clinton connection.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Typically the FBI doesn't grant immunity unless the are getting something in return, so I hope Pagliano spilled the beans. I am hoping Comey butters Hillary up for the first hour of the interview making her vulnerable and then BOOM hits her with the cold hard facts.QuakerOats;1789685 wrote:Hopefully the immunity they granted to Pagliano has caused him to hand over the ammo to corner her.
It has been a year-long investigation; they should have the facts now .......we will see if she can lie her way out with the FBI.
It wasn't on a stage, Mr. Didn't See The Video.jmog;1789686 wrote:If someone is trying to get on state with a POTUS candidate that is not supposed to be on stage they most certainly SHOULD be "grabbed". I can't stand Trump but she was lucky it was just a "grab" and not a tackle.
I am no Donald apologist, but if this happened 20 years ago (hell even 10 years ago) and she tried to apply charges she would be laughed at. If the same situation happened with Obama or Hillary I would call this a joke as well. I have experience a lot worse in a crowd of people.Heretic;1789698 wrote:It wasn't on a stage, Mr. Didn't See The Video.
[video=youtube;3s5hXeKxyEE][/video]
