Is that worthy of betting an iPad over?sleeper;1781937 wrote:Bernie will never be President. #reality
If voters are smart he won't.sleeper;1781937 wrote:Bernie will never be President. #reality
Nice salt dude.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1781938 wrote:Is that worthy of betting an iPad over?
Aaaand per usual, you're wrong.sleeper;1781942 wrote:Nice salt dude.
Bernie is in the same situation Ron Paul was in years ago with the only difference being Bernie has less potential candidates in the pool. He will never be President. Reality.
Willing to bet any amount of money that Bernie will never be President.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1781944 wrote:Aaaand per usual, you're wrong.
Bernie should stay away from ranches hotelssleeper;1781946 wrote:Willing to bet any amount of money that Bernie will never be President.
If he wins the nomination, he's virtually a lock for presidency.sleeper;1781946 wrote:Willing to bet any amount of money that Bernie will never be President.
And if he is, we're fucked.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1781952 wrote:If he wins the nomination, he's virtually a lock for presidency.
You'll learn to love Comrade Bernie and his policies.BR1986FB;1781958 wrote:And if he is, we're fucked.
Won't matter. If a doormat like Hillary or Sanders gets in, we'll likely all be dead anyhow. POS Obama has already started laying the groundwork for that with his foreign policies. Putin probably chuckles at Obama all day long. He'll be licking his chops if someone as inept as Sanders or Hillary get in there. They will be pissing down their legs if old Vlad turns up the heat and backs them into a corner which, as I said, Obama has already laid the groundwork for.majorspark;1781959 wrote:You'll learn to love Comrade Bernie and his policies.
So no bet?ZWICK 4 PREZ;1781952 wrote:If he wins the nomination, he's virtually a lock for presidency.
Ron Paul wasn't giving away free shit.sleeper;1781942 wrote:Bernie is in the same situation Ron Paul was in years ago with the only difference being Bernie has less potential candidates in the pool. He will never be President. Reality.
Who would bet a welcher like you?sleeper;1781964 wrote:So no bet?
Your point is valid. I would suggest, however, there's a difference between gaining ground and winning. The south is not Nevada, Iowa or New Hampshire.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1781935 wrote:My point is she loses ground to him at every location as their primary nears. So you'd expect to see similar things in those states too.
I would have agreed a month ago. I get a sense that even a large portion of the dem base is tired of Hillary though. I can guarantee one thing.... The party won't rally around a Hillary nomination. She won't win the general.Con_Alma;1781973 wrote:Your point is valid. I would suggest, however, there's a difference between gaining ground and winning. The south is not Nevada, Iowa or New Hampshire.
It will take a federal indictment for Mr. Sanders to gain the Democratic nomination.
The overwhelmingly majority of the 394 aren't committed to Clinton.Con_Alma;1781990 wrote:Here's where they are at today. Still a long way to go.
Clinton 394
Sanders 44
2382 needed
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-delegate-tracker/
There's really not a fight. They'll vote for whoever is leading the race.Con_Alma;1781995 wrote:Nope but you'd rather be fighting to keep them than trying to earn them.
I'd be willing to set up an escrow account if the amount is high enough.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1781972 wrote:Who would bet a welcher like you?