jmog;269195 wrote:I swear you either have not read what I have posted carefully or you have reading comprehension issues.

jmog;1759375 wrote:You keep moving the goal posts and then saying I can't read...interesting.

You said 25% originally, not me.

You originally meant to say that Trump/Coulture want to completely stop legal immigration and they had a significant conservative support for this. Now its just a "moratorium". You can play semantics all you want but you can't keep saying someone else can't read when you posted this...



If you want to play semantics so can I. Proper grammar would mean that the two bolded parts go together. That your sentence subject (the significant portion of the conservative movement) is described by the prepositional phrase (who are against more legal immigration). If you truly wanted ONLY the "against more legal immigration" to apply to Trump/Coulter then you needed a comma after Coulter I believe (although I am not an English major, but I was quite good at the grammar parts of it).

So, maybe I can read and you just can't properly express what you really mean?

You directly said there was a significant portion of conservatives that are against legal immigration and want it to stop. You later clarified that to "25%" rather than a majority. You then moved it to Trump/Coulture wanting legal immigration to stop and conservatives support them. Now it is that Trump/Coulture just want a moratorium on legal immigration and conservatives support them.

Care to move the goal posts again?

jmog;1759375 wrote:You keep moving the goal posts and then saying I can't read...interesting.

You said 25% originally, not me.

So do you have a link then that shows "25%" of conservatives want to completely stop immigration all together, even the legal type? Or is this just opinion?

Belly35;1759376 wrote:You can go to jail and notify where you live the rest of your life if found with porn on your computer in your home but you can go the White House, get media approval to run for President, lie, hid and erase the documents to Congress and the American people, if found with top secret gov. security files on your personal file server in your basement. This makes the porn guy look pretty good

QuakerOats;1760430 wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKosd0xJadE


Nice sample of Hillary supporters ...................the mindlessness of the Left

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760514 wrote:Cool video! Did you get it from the late show? Idiot.

like_that;1760547 wrote:Lol at getting butt hurt over the video.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760578 wrote:lol i didnt watch lol the video lol ... but lol @ posting anecdotal videos and passing them as generalizations ..

QuakerOats;1760580 wrote:I didn't figure you would watch it .............dumb people voting for liberal politicians; hard to endure when one is in that camp.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760578 wrote:lol i didnt watch lol the video lol ... but lol @ posting anecdotal videos and passing them as generalizations ..

Heretic;1760589 wrote:Considering I live in a rural area, I see all sorts of dumb people who vote for conservative politicians. And considering I come to this site, well, there's you to really take that cake on that front. But at least I have the sense to not generalize people who vote one way or the other based on the lowest common denominators of voters.

Heretic;1760589 wrote:Considering I live in a rural area, I see all sorts of dumb people who vote for conservative politicians. And considering I come to this site, well, there's you to really take that cake on that front. But at least I have the sense to not generalize people who vote one way or the other based on the lowest common denominators of voters.

like_that;1760592 wrote:The butthurt is even stronger with this post. I didn't post the video. I'm well aware you can make videos like this on both sides. You won't see me getting my panties in a bunch over them though. Keep imploding though, it brings the lulz.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760621 wrote:How is reminding Quaker he's the biggest idiot on the forum being butthurt?


but by all means.. please interject yourself into something you weren't involved in lol.

like_that;1760622 wrote:Oh, I thought this was a forum? Please, continue on with your one on one conversation with somebody you perceive be an idiot.

It was the overreaction to answer your question. It would be like overreacting to anything isadore says.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760627 wrote:calling quaker an idiot is never an overreaction.

Automatik;1760639 wrote:She's going to be the pres for 8 years. Book it.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1760627 wrote:calling quaker an idiot is never an overreaction.

QuakerOats;1760656 wrote:Name calling because you can't win on the merits = typical liberal behavior.

Good luck.

QuakerOats;1760595 wrote:Obviously high again. Hope you get help soon.

SportsAndLady;1760640 wrote:Thinks someone is an idiot. Argues with that idiot.

Great logic, zwick.

There's a quote out there about not arguing with idiots because from an outside perspective you can get confused for the idiot.