Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Cleveland Browns Offseason Talk

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Cleveland Browns Offseason Talk
P

pkebker

Senior Member

760 posts
Apr 4, 2010 12:39 PM
After reading that article, the DL scares me more than ever. Not only are they pretty bad, they are really old. We definitely need to address the DL in the draft.
Apr 4, 2010 8:39am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 4, 2010 1:22 PM
pkebker wrote: After reading that article, the DL scares me more than ever. Not only are they pretty bad, they are really old. We definitely need to address the DL in the draft.
Several recent mocks have Gerald McCoy falling to #7. Thoughts?

I think he's more of a 4-3 talent myself.
Apr 4, 2010 9:22am
royal_k's avatar

royal_k

Senior Member

4,423 posts
Apr 4, 2010 1:31 PM
BR1986FB wrote:
pkebker wrote: After reading that article, the DL scares me more than ever. Not only are they pretty bad, they are really old. We definitely need to address the DL in the draft.
Several recent mocks have Gerald McCoy falling to #7. Thoughts?

I think he's more of a 4-3 talent myself.
Not sure about McCoy' ability to play the 3-4 either.

I still believe they target Berry if available or trade down to get Thomas with their 1st pick.
Apr 4, 2010 9:31am
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Apr 4, 2010 1:40 PM
He'd have to play DE, he's definitely a talent. I would probably use the #7 pick for someone that wouldn't appear to be a project at their respective position.
Apr 4, 2010 9:40am
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 4, 2010 2:08 PM
BR1986FB wrote:
pkebker wrote: After reading that article, the DL scares me more than ever. Not only are they pretty bad, they are really old. We definitely need to address the DL in the draft.
Several recent mocks have Gerald McCoy falling to #7. Thoughts?

I think he's more of a 4-3 talent myself.
He is a beast, but if Berry is there....they need to take him.
Apr 4, 2010 10:08am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 4, 2010 2:30 PM
This is all assuming Berry is gone. Highly doubt Berry AND McCoy will be there at 7.
Apr 4, 2010 10:30am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 4, 2010 2:36 PM
BR1986FB wrote:
I think he's more of a 4-3 talent myself.
I hear this constantly with top talent..so I ask the question--why are we even in the 3-4?
Apr 4, 2010 10:36am
royal_k's avatar

royal_k

Senior Member

4,423 posts
Apr 4, 2010 2:44 PM
BR1986FB wrote: This is all assuming Berry is gone. Highly doubt Berry AND McCoy will be there at 7.
Yeah....that's highly unlikely unles 2 QB's are taken in the top 6.

Evean if it were to happen, Berry has to be the pick. I think he is an immediate impact player and fills a postion of need more than a defensive lineman.
Apr 4, 2010 10:44am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 4, 2010 2:47 PM
royal_k wrote:
BR1986FB wrote: This is all assuming Berry is gone. Highly doubt Berry AND McCoy will be there at 7.
Yeah....that's highly unlikely unles 2 QB's are taken in the top 6.

Evean if it were to happen, Berry has to be the pick. I think he is an immediate impact player and fills a postion of need more than a defensive lineman.
I think Bradford and Clausen will both be gone by pick #4. Also starting to think the Sea Chickens take Berry at #6. I hope Berry is there though.
Apr 4, 2010 10:47am
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 4, 2010 2:56 PM
I would want no part of Clausen in the top 5....I just don't see it.

S&L, that is a good question. I honestly thought that with Holmgren coming in, they would go back to the 4-3.
Apr 4, 2010 10:56am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 4, 2010 3:00 PM
wes_mantooth wrote:
S&L, that is a good question. I honestly thought that with Holmgren coming in, they would go back to the 4-3.
I thought the same thing too but if you look at some of the defensive players acquired (Gocong), it's implied the 3-4 isn't going away anytime soon.
Apr 4, 2010 11:00am
royal_k's avatar

royal_k

Senior Member

4,423 posts
Apr 4, 2010 3:41 PM
Those articles just reinforce the Browns targeting Berry.

I don'y bye into not drafting a safety in the top 10, regardless of the injury problems associated with the position.

This guy is a flat out player.
Apr 4, 2010 11:41am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 4, 2010 11:19 PM
Pretty surprised to see that the Browns are SERIOUSLY considering a trade UP with their first round pick. That possibility is always there and it may not happen but with the numerous needs, this would surprise me.
Apr 4, 2010 7:19pm
B

Big Red Monster

Senior Member

436 posts
Apr 5, 2010 12:37 AM
If you see them trade up from 7, that will no doubt be for either Bradford or Claussen.
Apr 4, 2010 8:37pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 5, 2010 12:40 AM
Big Red Monster wrote: If you see them trade up from 7, that will no doubt be for either Bradford or Claussen.
I'm hearing that they are "seriously considering" it. Doesn't mean it WILL happen but if it does, I doubt it's for Clausen. With the McNabb to the Skins deal, Clausen will likely be there at #7.
Apr 4, 2010 8:40pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Apr 5, 2010 2:45 AM
Good job Holmgren, the hero of Cleveland. You could've had McNabb but will settle for eek and meek. hahaha.
Apr 4, 2010 10:45pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Apr 5, 2010 2:52 AM
Not getting McNabb was a good move for Cleveland.
Apr 4, 2010 10:52pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Apr 5, 2010 2:54 AM
HighRoller74 wrote: Not getting McNabb was a good move for Cleveland.
That is the question. McNabb is the superior qb to Delhomme, but Delhomme just cost money and McNabb cost picks. Which is the better deal?
Apr 4, 2010 10:54pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Apr 5, 2010 3:00 AM
^^^

McNabb would've bolted Cleveland after next season, unless he felt they were on the cusp.

Delhomme is just happy someone wanted him, and maybe he returns to form, maybe he doesn't. Only out some cash. Cleveland is drafting a QB this year anyone to groom.

So I think the picks are too great to give up, for a team rebuilding.
Apr 4, 2010 11:00pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Apr 5, 2010 3:01 AM
HighRoller74 wrote: Not getting McNabb was a good move for Cleveland.
I agree. Seneca Wallace is much better. The joke of an organization continues. LMFAO.:huh:
Apr 4, 2010 11:01pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Apr 5, 2010 3:07 AM
Holmgren is going to rake in a million dollars per win this season. Not bad.
Apr 4, 2010 11:07pm
B

big_hits24

Senior Member

175 posts
Apr 5, 2010 3:11 AM
^^ Yep, the Eagles...They trade a starting CB and LB to the Browns for mid round picks and a LB who plays special teams, now today, they trade their QB from the last 10yrs, who was one of their best players if not the best, to a division rival for crap...Philly has really messed this whole McNabb thing up badly! He is probably glad to get out of there and now to have an opportunity to beat them twice in a season. I'm not even sure how good Kolb will actually be for the Eagles with no McNabb...so this organization has definitely been the joke this offseason.
Apr 4, 2010 11:11pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Apr 5, 2010 3:23 AM
Offseason jokes:
1.Browns
2.Eagles
Apr 4, 2010 11:23pm