His history of drafting quarterbacks in the later rounds isn't all that impressive. Matt Hasselback? Ty Detmer?....grrrrr. Mark Brunnel was good though.
Hasselbeck? Really? Hasselbeck was a pretty damn good QB when healthy.Footwedge wrote:His history of drafting quarterbacks in the later rounds isn't all that impressive. Matt Hasselback? Ty Detmer?....grrrrr. Mark Brunnel was good though.
If he means what he says and says what he means, then he needs to trade up and grab Bradford.
He states the importance of having a great quarterback...well then go get the highest rated one and be done with it.
What happened with Quinn happenend. It wasn't his fault. And should have no impact on pickng another one early.
"Rob Sims is out of there, they've already told him. They aren't letting Rob Sims work out at the facility, so he's gone, he will not be a Seahawk next year. I talked to Rob last week and he told me that they (Seahawks) have given him word that they did not want him around the facility working out because they didn't want him to get injured."
The problem here is that the Chickens want a 4th for him and the Browns are thinking 6th. He may be packaged along with Seattle's center and draft picks to acquire Brandon Marshall.OneBuckeye wrote: http://mynorthwest.com/?nid=292&sid=301189
Sims is gone from seattle
"Rob Sims is out of there, they've already told him. They aren't letting Rob Sims work out at the facility, so he's gone, he will not be a Seahawk next year. I talked to Rob last week and he told me that they (Seahawks) have given him word that they did not want him around the facility working out because they didn't want him to get injured."
Did you forget about James Davis? I think whoever picks up mccoy in the draft gets a real steal.BR1986FB wrote: Colt McCoy to visit....
http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/10831/s%20ource-colt-mccoy-to-visit-browns
BTW....don't be surprised if the Browns do NOT select a RB in this draft. Peyton Hillis is expected to be one half of a two-headed RB "monster" with Harrison this year.
Didn't forget about Davis but from what I've heard, they are not counting on him to be a major contributor.Pick6 wrote:Did you forget about James Davis? I think whoever picks up mccoy in the draft gets a real steal.BR1986FB wrote: Colt McCoy to visit....
http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/10831/s%20ource-colt-mccoy-to-visit-browns
BTW....don't be surprised if the Browns do NOT select a RB in this draft. Peyton Hillis is expected to be one half of a two-headed RB "monster" with Harrison this year.
Wouldn't want to do it for McCoy though. The ONLY QB I'd use picks to move up on is Bradford and even that is way too steep.j_crazy wrote: god knows they've got the picks to package to get back into round 1.
Yeah, they have an article on ESPN but its an insider article.BR1986FB wrote: http://twitter.com/TheOBR
Well if the Rams don't go Bradford at #1 we won't have to worry about McCoy because Holmgren will likely trade up if he falls to #3 (assuming Detroit won't take him).j_crazy wrote: no way mccoy makes it past St. Louis at 33 (assuming they don't go bradford/clausen #1).
sorry i was talking about colt mccoy. not gerald.BR1986FB wrote:Well if the Rams don't go Bradford at #1 we won't have to worry about McCoy because Holmgren will likely trade up if he falls to #3 (assuming Detroit won't take him).j_crazy wrote: no way mccoy makes it past St. Louis at 33 (assuming they don't go bradford/clausen #1).
So was I. If Sam Bradford falls out of the top slot in the draft and as low as #3, I think that Colt McCoy will be a moot point because I think Holmgren/Heckert will trade up for him. The asking price to go from #7 to #1 is VERY steep where they might be able to stomach a move from #7 to # 3 or 4.j_crazy wrote:sorry i was talking about colt mccoy. not gerald.BR1986FB wrote:Well if the Rams don't go Bradford at #1 we won't have to worry about McCoy because Holmgren will likely trade up if he falls to #3 (assuming Detroit won't take him).j_crazy wrote: no way mccoy makes it past St. Louis at 33 (assuming they don't go bradford/clausen #1).
trade up to take bradford? i didn't know the browns were that high on him.BR1986FB wrote:So was I. If Sam Bradford falls out of the top slot in the draft and as low as #3, I think that Colt McCoy will be a moot point because I think Holmgren/Heckert will trade up for him. The asking price to go from #7 to #1 is VERY steep where they might be able to stomach a move from #7 to # 3 or 4.j_crazy wrote:sorry i was talking about colt mccoy. not gerald.BR1986FB wrote:Well if the Rams don't go Bradford at #1 we won't have to worry about McCoy because Holmgren will likely trade up if he falls to #3 (assuming Detroit won't take him).j_crazy wrote: no way mccoy makes it past St. Louis at 33 (assuming they don't go bradford/clausen #1).
"but with the Rams drafting Suh and also being the only team with a dire need for a QB in the top six"BR1986FB wrote: It's from the Bleacher Report so take it FWIW....
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/367547-2010-nfl-mock-draft-could-sam-bradford-land-in-cleveland-at-no-7
Matt CasselSonofanump wrote:"but with the Rams drafting Suh and also being the only team with a dire need for a QB in the top six"BR1986FB wrote: It's from the Bleacher Report so take it FWIW....
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/367547-2010-nfl-mock-draft-could-sam-bradford-land-in-cleveland-at-no-7
I forget, who does KC have at QB?
