Con_Alma;1694846 wrote:Is it any less selfish for the "have nots" to want such subsidies?

Cleveland Buck;1694843 wrote:So why don't know want to give some poor American social mobility? Are you too selfish and greedy to write a check?

isadore;1694850 wrote:you are so unwilling to grant the true resources needed to provide those in need the basics for social mobility. Support higher taxes to help those in need.

Cleveland Buck;1694856 wrote:I am more than willing to grant them your money. Now write the check unless you are too selfish and greedy to do it.

Con_Alma;1694829 wrote:I know exactly what the expenses of college are today. I have one there and one on the way.

Would your debt have been lower if you stayed another year at Community College?

Do you think everyone should be given 2 free years even if they are able to pay?

isadore;1694844 wrote:no, it makes things better for the haves, but not the have nots.
which of course is not a problem for you.

isadore;1694850 wrote:you are so unwilling to grant the true resources needed to provide those in need the basics for social mobility. Support higher taxes to help those in need.

gut;1694864 wrote:Sorry, the "can't afford college" excuse is literally for stupid people. The ability to obtain affordable loans for college has been available for a long, long time.

gut;1694865 wrote:A college degree doesn't offer the stupid social mobility. And college is only unaffordable if you're stupid.

isadore;1694872 wrote:NO it is unaffordable if you lack the economic resources. But of course to you, it is just "let them eat cake."

gut;1694873 wrote:Even stupid people can get 10's of thousands of dollars in totally free money.

So college is only unaffordable if you're stupid AND ignorant. Actually, college is more affordable for the poor than it is the middle class.

isadore;1694874 wrote:according to you, from the "let them eat cake." school. Well gosh a ruddies let's give the middle class a break and have free college. No it might cost you a few bucks.

gut;1694875 wrote:yawn....your spiel is simply tired and ignorant. Nobody needs MORE free money to be able to afford college. "I can't afford college" is just an excuse for people who are too stupid to get a degree.

isadore;1694876 wrote:gosh a ruddies of course you have no problem denying those worthy young people from the lower quintiles a chance to rise. It is not you or yours, so screw'em.

isadore;1694848 wrote:gosh a ruddies the perfect excuse for the haves to continuously deny aid to those in need. The perfect excuse for selfishness. Those in need are just being so selfish hoping for aid from those that have the resources.

Pick6;1694861 wrote:...
2- I dont even know if I think you should be given any years for free if you are able to pay, let alone two. What is your definition of "able to pay"? Out of pocket or having to take out loans?

isadore;1694876 wrote:gosh a ruddies of course you have no problem denying those worthy young people from the lower quintiles a chance to rise. It is not you or yours, so screw'em.

Con_Alma;1694846 wrote:Is it any less selfish for the "have nots" to want such subsidies?

gut;1694884 wrote:No. I have no problem with the stupid & lazy being on the bottom of the economic ladder. That's how it SHOULD work.

Belly35;1694895 wrote:you do understand that with out the stupid and uneducated Union enrollment would drop, Democatics voting base would decrease....

isadore;1694900 wrote:gosh a ruddies you equate being without resources in a society with declining social mobility equals being stupid and lazy.

gut;1694875 wrote:"I can't afford college" is just an excuse for people who are too lazy to get a degree.

gut;1694907 wrote:No..LITERALLY only the stupid and lazy can't get money for college. Over $60k in free money already available, and nearly another $30k in subsidized federal loans (5% interest rate). And that's before financial aid, scholarships and any other money.