Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

2014-2015 Cleveland Cavaliers Season Thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2014-2015 Cleveland Cavaliers Season Thread
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 23, 2015 1:08 AM
Whatever helps you sleep at night dude. I saw your deleted post. You have no clue what I do.
Apr 22, 2015 9:08pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 23, 2015 1:11 AM
It wasn't a necessary post, you already posted what I tried to pre-empt. And I've already made my point about the band of fools you FW and Iggy are so I can go back to discussing Cavs now.
Apr 22, 2015 9:11pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 23, 2015 1:23 AM
From the Grantland NBA Shootaround

"“I’ve been in this moment before. A lot of our guys haven’t,” James said after Game 2. He took eight shots in the first half, with Boston leading much of that time, before pushing down the pedal in the fourth quarter, letting off nine shots and hitting six. James finished with 30 points, nine rebounds, and seven assists — four of which came in the first quarter.

As scrappy and well-coached as the Celtics are, LeBron could flex-bomb as soon as the tip goes up, which, in tandem with Kyrie Irving’s already impressive play (30 points in Game 1, 26 in Game 2), would surely put an end to these slow Cavalier starts. In the 2013-14 playoffs, LeBron averaged about five and a half shots in the first quarter of games. He’s attempted five total first-quarter shots in two games this playoffs.
I can’t wait to see what the Cavs look like when and if they ever figure out who they are."

Not sure I agree with that. I'd rather have Lebron for the 4th than Lebron blow up in the 1st, although I get the argument that if Lebron is aggressive early and the Cavs are staked to a big lead we won't need him for the 4th.
Apr 22, 2015 9:23pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Apr 23, 2015 2:05 AM
Pick6;1723446 wrote:nobody gives a fuck that you're a lawyer. LOL at being out of school and talking about grades. You aren't even a year into your career. Get over yourself.

Please try and use your advanced stats again to suggest Joakim Noah is a top 3 player in the league.
This is rich from the guy who goes out of his way to let people know he isn't working for one of the big 4.
Apr 22, 2015 10:05pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 23, 2015 2:11 AM
like_that;1723466 wrote:This is rich from the guy who goes out of his way to let people know he isn't working for one of the big 4.
link? And your post doesn't make sense regardless.
Apr 22, 2015 10:11pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Apr 23, 2015 4:26 AM
lhslep134;1723444 wrote:I'm curious: why do the people that have said legitimately stupid things on here always band together and back each other up?

Iggy and FW come to each other's defenses all the time and now FW is coming to Pick's defense. All 3 of you have said shockingly un-intelligent things on here so there must be something that magnetizes you guys to each other. Although Pick does appear to know how to do basic math which should place him above FW's paygrade but apparently not.

If you're going to group the people who call you out together, then I'm grouping all of the morons together.
How many people here feel the need to constantly brag about oneself and what they do for a living? You're a lawyer...so what. I ran a company for 20 years and made more than you will ever make per year. So who gives a shit how much money I have? Nobody. Here's a clue Shemp...when I started out as a 20 something year old punk, I didn't waste my precious time hanging out in social settings. No, there was no internet, but plenty of places to. hang out.

As for my math skills, I will put up my math transcripts against yours...any time you want. You don't become a life master at duplicate bridge at the age of 43 unless one is brilliant in logic and probability/statistics.
Apr 23, 2015 12:26am
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Apr 23, 2015 4:33 AM
Now back to hoops....Would love to see JR break out of his shooting slump. I'm sure he will. Can't rave enough about TT's prowess on the glass. Damn he was clutch down the stretch with the game on the line. Delli continues to play way better than what I'd ever see out of him.

People are complaining about lack of blowouts but both games were within 3 points of the betting spread. I look for a sweep.
Apr 23, 2015 12:33am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 23, 2015 4:42 AM
Footwedge;1723498 wrote: You don't become a life master at duplicate bridge at the age of 43 unless one is brilliant in logic and probability/statistics.
I'm absolutely certain that someone who thinks an increase from 16 to 48 is a 300% increase, as you did, was never anywhere close to brilliant in logic and probability/statistics.

I'm also absolutely certain that someone who, as everyone on this site who saw your posts on the subject will attest, completely botched the calculation of percentiles was never anywhere close to brilliant in logic and probability/statistics.

and LO-F'G-L at you critiquing me for saying I'm a lawyer and then dropping that you're a MASTER AT BRIDGE. At least the title I drop actually means something. And I don't even say it unprovoked, it only seems to come up when you or Pick are running your mouths.

You didn't have to explain that you didn't spend your time in social settings in your young adulthood, it was already obvious.
Apr 23, 2015 12:42am
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Apr 23, 2015 5:05 AM
Lshlep is the king of thread ruining. Can you two homos get back to talking about the cavs and stop arguing over being a lawyer and who's smarter.
Apr 23, 2015 1:05am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 23, 2015 5:22 AM
DeyDurkie5;1723501 wrote:Lshlep is the king of thread ruining.
I'll admit to this. But in my semi-defense it's mostly because I'm pointing out errors in reasoning or logic that inevitably devolve into pissing matches because if there's something that gets someone blood boiling faster than anything it's someone pointing out the flaws in their line of reasoning or logic.

I'm trying to cut back but there is a ton of flawed reasoning on here and sometimes I can't help myself. My job training tought the application and analysis of logic and reasoning and my job reinforces the importance of it, so it's really hard to sit back on the sideline while witnessing flawed reasoning (or in Footwedge's case the botching of elementary mathematics)

I'm cognizant that I can be an ass about it from time to time. Trying to chill out about doing it
Apr 23, 2015 1:22am
ZWICK 4 PREZ's avatar

ZWICK 4 PREZ

Senior Member

7,733 posts
Apr 23, 2015 10:06 AM
lhslep134;1723500 wrote:I'm absolutely certain that someone who thinks an increase from 16 to 48 is a 300% increase, as you did, was never anywhere close to brilliant in logic and probability/statistics.

LOL
eh 200, 300... whats the difference? they both end in 00.
Apr 23, 2015 6:06am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Apr 23, 2015 12:31 PM
EVERYBODY LOVE EVERYBODY
Apr 23, 2015 8:31am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Apr 23, 2015 12:41 PM
lhslep134;1723500 wrote:And I don't even say it unprovoked, it only seems to come up when you or Pick are running your mouths.
You're right. This time was totally provoked and Footwedge and I were "running our mouths". Get over yourself.
Apr 23, 2015 8:41am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 23, 2015 1:36 PM
Pick6;1723529 wrote:You're right. This time was totally provoked and Footwedge and I were "running our mouths". Get over yourself.
I said OR not AND. It wasn't you this time, it was FW. http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1723443#post1723443.

I love how you tell me to get over myself in the same post that shows you failed to comprehend what I wrote. That's you in a nut-shell: run your mouth with no regard for whether you're right or being an idiot. When you're right, it's fine. When you're wrong, like usual, it's hilarious.
Apr 23, 2015 9:36am
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 23, 2015 1:45 PM
Girls, take the cat fight to the ladies room so the rest of us can get back to basketball. K? Thanks
Apr 23, 2015 9:45am
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 23, 2015 3:12 PM
Think the Celtics make any lineup adjustments at home to try to generate some additional production? In all honesty, I find it interesting that they bring Thomas off the bench. It seems that their most productive group is when Thomas and Smart are both on the court at the same time, with Olynyk at the 5 spot. Bradley has been completely ineffective thus far, and it wouldn't surprise me to see them make a switch.

JR needs to start finding his stroke as well. I feel that the spacing has been off a little this series, which can largely be attributed to JR not knocking down shots. Hopefully, he gets it rolling tonight in Boston, and the landslide follows.

Regardless of who is in the lineup for Boston, I'm expecting the next home game for the Cavaliers to be in the EC semis.
Apr 23, 2015 11:12am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Apr 23, 2015 3:24 PM
Brad Stevens said he would probably be switching up the starting line-up for GM 3
Apr 23, 2015 11:24am
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Apr 23, 2015 3:38 PM
Laley23;1723580 wrote:Brad Stevens said he would probably be switching up the starting line-up for GM 3
My guess is that Bass will not be in the starting lineup either. Sullinger provided a ton of offense in limited minutes. I know he's just coming back from injury recently, but can't hold anything back at this point.
Apr 23, 2015 11:38am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Apr 23, 2015 3:40 PM
Laley23;1723580 wrote:Brad Stevens said he would probably be switching up the starting line-up for GM 3
Doesn't matter. There isn't enough talent on the Celtics to compete with Cleveland. If the Cavs lose a game, I'll eat my hat, but they won't.
Apr 23, 2015 11:40am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Apr 23, 2015 3:53 PM
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1723572 wrote:
Regardless of who is in the lineup for Boston, I'm expecting the next home game for the Cavaliers to be in the EC semis.
I'm expecting a sweep but won't be surprised if Boston steals one. Curious to see what changes Stevens has in store.
Apr 23, 2015 11:53am
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Apr 23, 2015 4:24 PM
sleeper;1723585 wrote:Doesn't matter. There isn't enough talent on the Celtics to compete with Cleveland. If the Cavs lose a game, I'll eat my hat, but they won't.
Is "eating your hat" the new "will give everyone an iPad"?
Apr 23, 2015 12:24pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Apr 23, 2015 5:10 PM
Heretic;1723602 wrote:Is "eating your hat" the new "will give everyone an iPad"?
It's a figurative term not a literal one. It saddens me that the intellectual integrity of people has fallen so greatly that I need to explicitly state that.
Apr 23, 2015 1:10pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 23, 2015 5:15 PM
I know people who will eat a hat if the price is right.
Apr 23, 2015 1:15pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Apr 23, 2015 5:31 PM
BR1986FB;1723633 wrote:I know people who will eat a hat if the price is right.
Better than McDonalds!
Apr 23, 2015 1:31pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Apr 23, 2015 5:35 PM
Heretic;1723647 wrote:Better than McDonalds!
Closely related as I know people who have eaten a "New Era" label on their Quarter Pounder with cheese. Same nutritonal value. ;)
Apr 23, 2015 1:35pm