gport_tennis;1731339 wrote:True, I was looking more at the overall picture of talent he has brought in (mostly transfers) compared to HS recruiting.
But is this model sustainable? Bringing in JUCO guys and transfers usually means extreme roster turnover every 1-2 years. He will continue to need to find cornerstone players (Niang and Morris are indeed that) to stabilize the teams. It's a difficult model to sustain. Heck, look at UK. They have even struggled on and off, even with top 5 talent every year, simply because of the turnover.
I always saw Hoiberg's run at ISU being more of a "I'm going to use it to promote my brand, pay back my Alma Mater/fans and have fun while doing it at the school I love." His future is in the NBA.
It's kind of like Brad Stevens in a way. There's no way the guy was going to maintain the level he set for himself at Butler (nor would it have been fair to expect him to). However, you're always going to be compared to yourself and what you have achieved. Given that Iowa State was a piss-on in the Big XII for a decade before Hoiberg wouldn't matter after he started progressing toward success.
Say a team like Miami or Chicago offered him full control right now. Could he turn it down? Even Donovan finally bolted after it started to show his model wasn't as sustainable as he thought at Florida.