F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Aug 3, 2014 11:32am
Which had the strongest team? Could probably include the early 70 A's or Orioles of that period. But for now, which of the 3 had the best team?
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Aug 3, 2014 11:56am
1995 Atlanta Braves.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3074/f30741f67f0b1b117ac5e56a9d66de74e964cd5e" alt="Rotinaj's avatar"
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Aug 3, 2014 12:07pm
2014 Reds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d795d/d795db7ecb7e1077cec1021cf28f6e148ddd730b" alt="BRF's avatar"
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Aug 3, 2014 12:40pm
1966 Orioles - 4 20 game winners
McNally 21-5
Palmer 20-10
Cuellar 20-9
Dobson 20-8
McNally 21-5
Palmer 20-10
Cuellar 20-9
Dobson 20-8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Aug 3, 2014 12:46pm
Apparentlylhslep134;1641035 wrote:1995 Atlanta Braves.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Aug 3, 2014 1:34pm
Well...I know the tribe had better hitting than the Big Red Machine. The 61 Yankees pounded it too.
W
wghfan
Posts: 744
Aug 3, 2014 2:03pm
How can you not include the 2013 Tigers? with that lineup?Footwedge;1641027 wrote:Which had the strongest team? Could probably include the early 70 A's or Orioles of that period. But for now, which of the 3 had the best team?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d795d/d795db7ecb7e1077cec1021cf28f6e148ddd730b" alt="BRF's avatar"
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Aug 3, 2014 2:09pm
1961 Yankees had a then record 240 team home runs.
64 of them came from 3 guys who shared the catching duties: Elston Howard 21, Johnny Blanchard 21 and Yogi Berra 22.
Maris and Mantle combined for 115.
Moose Skowron chipped in 28.
64 of them came from 3 guys who shared the catching duties: Elston Howard 21, Johnny Blanchard 21 and Yogi Berra 22.
Maris and Mantle combined for 115.
Moose Skowron chipped in 28.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Aug 3, 2014 5:38pm
First off, why even throw the 76 Reds in there. Good team, not great. Why not use 1975?
61 Yanks. 109 wins. WS title.
75 Reds. 108 wins. WS title.
95 Indians. 100 wins. No WS title.
Is this a serious thread?
61 Yanks. 109 wins. WS title.
75 Reds. 108 wins. WS title.
95 Indians. 100 wins. No WS title.
Is this a serious thread?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="Iliketurtles's avatar"
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Aug 3, 2014 6:02pm
It's footwedge so obviously it's not serious.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Aug 4, 2014 1:04am
Reds swept the playoffs in 76...thus the comparison asshole. The Indians had the highest winning percentage over the other 2. Also a much higher winning percentage than the 75 Reds. Need more?Azubuike24;1641125 wrote:First off, why even throw the 76 Reds in there. Good team, not great. Why not use 1975?
61 Yanks. 109 wins. WS title.
75 Reds. 108 wins. WS title.
95 Indians. 100 wins. No WS title.
Is this a serious thread?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Aug 4, 2014 8:35am
Should've asterisked that 95 was a strike shortened year or gave a winning %Footwedge;1641179 wrote:Reds swept the playoffs in 76...thus the comparison asshole. The Indians had the highest winning percentage over the other 2. Also a much higher winning percentage than the 75 Reds. Need more?
Not winning it all kills them in this argument. You might as well include the 2001? Mariners
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a28d/3a28d8d82ef8ea62413a3cf2f5308665d17dc3e7" alt="Heretic's avatar"
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Aug 4, 2014 9:55am
Or the one Giants team from before the Wild Card got implemented that won over 100 games (I'm thinking 103, but not positive), but didn't make the playoffs.Ironman92;1641195 wrote:Should've asterisked that 95 was a strike shortened year or gave a winning %
Not winning it all kills them in this argument. You might as well include the 2001? Mariners
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Aug 4, 2014 10:11am
103 sounds right...Braves won 104Heretic;1641216 wrote:Or the one Giants team from before the Wild Card got implemented that won over 100 games (I'm thinking 103, but not positive), but didn't make the playoffs.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Aug 4, 2014 10:29am
Very difficult to compare teams from different era's. I try to then compare the players from each team with how good they are with the players of that time frame, so basically if a team has a number of HOF'ers i go with them as they had more players who excelled in their era to the extent they were seen as some of the best ever.
I know its not the best way to do it, but just the way I do i.t
I know its not the best way to do it, but just the way I do i.t
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Aug 4, 2014 2:44pm
I hate Detoilet, but the '84 Tigers were beasts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8150f/8150fbc60aa3d39b1244e5ae37f6ed7f3e87747b" alt="ernest_t_bass's avatar"
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Aug 5, 2014 9:43am
1990 Cincinnati Reds.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Aug 5, 2014 9:23pm
27 Yankees