ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Feb 4, 2014 1:30pm
What'd be the formula to calculate hours worked in a day, given the scenario?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 1:39pm
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Feb 4, 2014 1:46pm
Hmm... google. Who'da thunk it.Commander of Awesome;1576295 wrote:http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel-help/add-or-subtract-time-HA102809662.aspx
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 2:48pm
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Feb 4, 2014 2:49pm
Commander of Awesome;1576312 wrote:
/etb'd
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 4, 2014 2:52pm
Why work; food, shelter, clothing, cell phones, and a snap card balance you can trade for drugs are easily obtainable - tax free, no less !!
Change we can believe in ...
Change we can believe in ...
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 2:54pm
You do realize that unemployment has been going down since Obamaa took over office...... Kinda makes your statement even more moronic.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 4, 2014 2:56pm
Well, now that CC's been neg'd to oblivion, we have a new candidate with Mr. Make Stupid-Ass Politard Comments in Non-Political Forums.QuakerOats;1576315 wrote:Why work; food, shelter, clothing, cell phones, and a snap card balance you can trade for drugs are easily obtainable - tax free, no less !!
Change we can believe in ...
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 4, 2014 2:58pm
Commander of Awesome;1576317 wrote:You do realize that unemployment has been going down since Obamaa took over office...... Kinda makes your statement even more moronic.
You do realize that fewer people are working today than when obama took office. Or maybe you didn't realize that because .................................you listen to obama.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 2:58pm
All in favor say I.Heretic;1576318 wrote:Well, now that CC's been neg'd to oblivion, we have a new candidate with Mr. Make Stupid-Ass Politard Comments in Non-Political Forums.
I
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 3:07pm
That's not accurate. Obama took office in 2009, and current UE is at it's lowest since 2007, pre recession and while Bush was in office.QuakerOats;1576320 wrote:You do realize that fewer people are working today than when obama took office. Or maybe you didn't realize that because .................................you listen to obama.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Feb 4, 2014 3:28pm
It is accurate. The only reason the UE 'rate' has declined is because many of the long-term unemployed gave up looking for work so they are no longer counted in the equation. However, as I stated, the number of people actually working is lower today than 5 years ago. And the number of 'long-term' unemployed is at a record level.
Good luck.
Good luck.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 3:36pm
Most of the long termed UE are the baby boomers. As most of them go on Social Security I'd expect the number of people working to continue to decline. The rate is solid measure bc it takes that into account. Hope this helps.QuakerOats;1576328 wrote:It is accurate. The only reason the UE 'rate' has declined is because many of the long-term unemployed gave up looking for work so they are no longer counted in the equation. However, as I stated, the number of people actually working is lower today than 5 years ago. And the number of 'long-term' unemployed is at a record level.
Good luck.
M
MontyBrunswick
Feb 4, 2014 4:15pm
Guys, this thread is about etb's stupid fucking question, not unemployment rates.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 4:42pm
Wasn't that dumb, he could have looked it up, sure. But ppl have gotten excel help here before. I actually never had to do that before, so I learned something today.
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Feb 4, 2014 5:22pm
If this is a trend, Belly will be red by Friday.Heretic;1576318 wrote:Well, now that CC's been neg'd to oblivion, we have a new candidate with Mr. Make Stupid-Ass Politard Comments in Non-Political Forums.
M
MontyBrunswick
Feb 4, 2014 5:34pm
It's a very common excel function, ERGO...Commander of Awesome;1576358 wrote:Wasn't that dumb
Commander of Awesome;1576358 wrote:he could have looked it up
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 6:16pm
You mean like how you could have googled what recently disco'd food people missed but instead decided to make a thread asking about it?dlazz;1576377 wrote:It's a very common excel function, ERGO...
M
MontyBrunswick
Feb 4, 2014 6:21pm
My thread was to generate discussion. His was asking an easily answered question that warranted a single response and nothing further.Commander of Awesome;1576395 wrote:You mean like how you could have googled what recently disco'd food people missed but instead decided to make a thread asking about it?
Hope this helps.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 6:36pm
ETB's thread: 18 repliesdlazz;1576396 wrote:My thread was to generate discussion. His was asking an easily answered question that warranted a single response and nothing further.
Hope this helps.
dlazz's thread: 4 replies
Sooooo.................... yeah.
M
MontyBrunswick
Feb 4, 2014 7:03pm
His post: (1) post asking question, (2) you answering his stupid question, (3-21) irrelevant posts.Commander of Awesome;1576405 wrote:ETB's thread: 18 replies
dlazz's thread: 4 replies
Sooooo.................... yeah.
Sooooo.................... yeah.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 4, 2014 7:07pm
Interesting opinion, too bad it's irrelevant. Hope this helps.dlazz;1576419 wrote:His post: (1) post asking question, (2) you answering his stupid question, (3-21) irrelevant posts.
Sooooo.................... yeah.