.jpg)
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 30, 2009 4:48pm
S
Society
Posts: 1,146
Dec 30, 2009 4:49pm
What?
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Dec 30, 2009 4:50pm
I find that hard to believe. I don't think all of the Tiger drama has really cost $12Billion.
jpake1
Posts: 2,389
Dec 30, 2009 4:50pm
Ouch.
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 30, 2009 4:59pm
First of all, you dont have to debate this with me, as I have no idea. The study was conducted by 2 UC Davis Economic Advisors though. Id think they may be more knowledgable on these matters than most of us huddlers would be.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 30, 2009 5:01pm
The article said 5-12 billion.
That's pretty stupid, but the markets aren't always rational and I could see how something like this could fluctuate the stocks of these companies, whether for the right or wrong.
That's pretty stupid, but the markets aren't always rational and I could see how something like this could fluctuate the stocks of these companies, whether for the right or wrong.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Dec 30, 2009 5:07pm
I don't see where anyone specifically called you out..so how are they debating with you? They are just commenting on the article..if you don't want them to comment on your article..don't start a thread about it. Pretty logical. As for the ARTICLE..I seen this a couple days ago..that's what I thought too..BS..how the hell can they say what this is/isn't going to cost anyone? A man cheated on his wife..big deal..I don't see where that will cost ANYONE (except Tiger) a lot of money.september63 wrote: First of all, you dont have to debate this with me, as I have no idea. The study was conducted by 2 UC Davis Economic Advisors though. Id think they may be more knowledgable on these matters than most of us huddlers would be.
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Dec 30, 2009 5:09pm
You can make numbers look anyway you want
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 30, 2009 5:12pm
LOL..........Who knew? freehuddle members that understand wallstreet and stock market trends better than 2 UC Davis economic professors.
pmoney25
Posts: 1,787
Dec 30, 2009 5:17pm
World leaders and religous leaders should read this forum. All answers are here.
In all honesty, there are some really intelligent people here.
In all honesty, there are some really intelligent people here.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 30, 2009 5:18pm
People own shares of stock in companies that Tiger used to advertise for, and when you have a figurehead like Tiger who's no longer seen as a "good guy", it can affect a person's perception of that company. Like I said, it may not be justified, but it certainly can have affect on a lot of people other than just Tiger Woods.GoChiefs wrote:I don't see where anyone specifically called you out..so how are they debating with you? They are just commenting on the article..if you don't want them to comment on your article..don't start a thread about it. Pretty logical. As for the ARTICLE..I seen this a couple days ago..that's what I thought too..BS..how the hell can they say what this is/isn't going to cost anyone? A man cheated on his wife..big deal..I don't see where that will cost ANYONE (except Tiger) a lot of money.september63 wrote: First of all, you dont have to debate this with me, as I have no idea. The study was conducted by 2 UC Davis Economic Advisors though. Id think they may be more knowledgable on these matters than most of us huddlers would be.
M
MrMcCluskie
Posts: 624
Dec 30, 2009 5:23pm
I think those numbers are seriously bloated. I hear old Tiger is still shackin up with one of his ho's. Sounds like he was a serious bum behind the scenes.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 30, 2009 5:36pm
september63 wrote: First of all, you dont have to debate this with me, as [size=xx-large]I have no idea. [/size]The study was conducted by 2 UC Davis Economic Advisors though. Id think they may be more knowledgable on these matters than most of us huddlers would be.
You and I finally agree on something, you have no idea.
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 30, 2009 5:37pm
Make the world a better place...punch skank in the face!!
skank
Posts: 6,543
Dec 30, 2009 5:39pm
Maybe we could sign a two year deal, oh, sorry, you're from Dover, one year deal it is.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Dec 30, 2009 7:34pm
5-12 billion. Thats quite the range in numbers.
B
Be Nice
Posts: 1,120
Dec 30, 2009 7:40pm
Tiger will be "pinch'in pennies" in 2010.