And they shot 76% in the second half on the iu game without him, so haMulva;1701588 wrote:Amir is shooting almost 71% for the season.
I think everyone knew what I meant. It was a joke on those two, who are awful.
And they shot 76% in the second half on the iu game without him, so haMulva;1701588 wrote:Amir is shooting almost 71% for the season.
They mentioned it like 13 times.ernest_t_bass;1703278 wrote:#31, Dakota Mathias, is an Elida HS grad, a "suburb" of Lima.
LOL, did they really? What'd they have to say?Midstate01;1703294 wrote:They mentioned it like 13 times.
This was a winnable game despite the free throw discrepancy. Both Russell and Thompson missed front ends of one and ones late in the game.Amir played OK on offense but was horrible on defense. I know he doesn't have quick feet, but he should, at this stage of his career, be able to anticipate better. With Loving out Purdue only had to guard Russell.centralbucksfan;1703254 wrote:Very disappointing loss. OSU is better and didn't play well at all. Russell got ZERO help from anyone. Scott was bad as usual. Thompson inconsistant as usual. Amir actually had decent game, but nothing else from others. Tate was solid. He and Russell only two bright spots. No question, not having Loving hurt big time.
And not one to complain as I realize on the road you are going to get screwed. But come on, Purdue shoots 27 ft's to OSU 9? And the game was as physical on both ends of the floor. That was obviously the difference in the game.
Agree with all of the above. And Amir, yes, was bad on defense. Pick n rolls he did nothing to contest numerous times as players drove right past him to the basket. Hell, sluff off and let them take a little jumper rather than a damn layup!Prescott;1703327 wrote:This was a winnable game despite the free throw discrepancy. Both Russell and Thompson missed front ends of one and ones late in the game.Amir played OK on offense but was horrible on defense. I know he doesn't have quick feet, but he should, at this stage of his career, be able to anticipate better. With Loving out Purdue only had to guard Russell.
I was really disappointed in the last shot.I know they did not have a timeout but a play could have been called from the bench. I am sure they have practiced for that exact situation and have designed plays that should yield a better shot.
We can only that Loving gets his act together quickly.
That basically he was bitter that OSU didn't give him the time of day during his recruitment.ernest_t_bass;1703321 wrote:LOL, did they really? What'd they have to say?
@BeauBishop: "lost privilege to wear Scarlet and Gray" - OSU on Loving. Interesting language in that statement.Mulva;1703156 wrote:Any word on why Loving is suspended, aside from general dumbassery?
Bucks down 8 early in the 2nd half.
ernest_t_bass;1703626 wrote:Anyone hear any more on Loving?
Very impresssive this day and age to be able to keep it so quiet.centralbucksfan;1703638 wrote:Not playing vs Rutgers on Sunday. But this one, whatever it is, is being kept very quiet. Sports Radio guys in Columbus don't even have a clue whats going on.
Which leads me to believe, its nothing to serious and just some internal stuff going on. Thought he turned corner a little bit with better effort and attitude and big game vs Maryland. But evidentially, something went wrong. Matta in recent interview said Loving is out vs Rutgers but hoped to get him back sooner rather than later. I suspect next week he will be back. OSU needs him big time as well. Besides Russell, he is only consistent shooter on team.se-alum;1703893 wrote:Very impresssive this day and age to be able to keep it so quiet.
The fact it hasn't been released makes me think it's more serious. If it was a missed practice, caught drinking, etc. OSU would just come out and say it. The fact they are keeping it quiet seems like he might need the protection from it...wildcats20;1704015 wrote:@BBaptistHoops: Matta said the decision to suspend Loving was not his but the athletic department's. #buckbk
That makes me think it's more serious than you do.