said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Sep 7, 2013 8:58pm
Tigerfan00
Posts: 3,427
Sep 7, 2013 9:45pm
Brought to you by AAF.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 7, 2013 10:38pm
ccrunner609;1496970 wrote:Man Shawn Kemp has lost some weight
Antonio Cromartie I think
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Sep 7, 2013 10:54pm
You're telling me he doesn't fully support those 27 kids? I'm shocked.
This guy needs to be "fixed" like the dog he is.
This guy needs to be "fixed" like the dog he is.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 7, 2013 11:14pm
How ... how do you not start using a condom at SOME point before reaching 27?
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Sep 7, 2013 11:25pm
By the same token, after a certain point why would you suddenly start caring?O-Trap;1496986 wrote:How ... how do you not start using a condom at SOME point before reaching 27?
He's only 39. Should easily sire another dozen kids before he hangs up the silk shorts.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 7, 2013 11:30pm
I dunno. It seems like if you start digging a hole, and you realize you've dug too deep to get out, you still don't keep digging.gut;1496991 wrote:By the same token, after a certain point why would you suddenly start caring?
He's only 39. Should easily sire another dozen kids before he hangs up the silk shorts.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Sep 8, 2013 1:50am
Nawhhwwwww...he's been digging laterally for yearsO-Trap;1496996 wrote:I dunno. It seems like if you start digging a hole, and you realize you've dug too deep to get out, you still don't keep digging.
There's also the U-boat syndrome...Once you've passed crush depth and are doomed, then it becomes a question of just how deep you can get.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 8, 2013 1:53am
Laterally? I don't even understand that analogy.gut;1497046 wrote:Nawhhwwwww...he's been digging laterally for years
There's also the U-boat syndrome...Once you've passed crush depth and are doomed, then it becomes a question of just how deep you can get.
U-boat syndrome ... I must be crazy, because I'd still try to climb out.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Sep 8, 2013 2:27am
Is it really that difficult? He's not actually digging deeper - I'm not sure how to phrase it, but at a certain point it becomes non-recourse fucking.O-Trap;1497048 wrote:Laterally? I don't even understand that analogy.
There are no additional repercussions whether he fathers one more child or 20 more. You're projecting your own morals and responsibilities. This guy is flipping burgers - he doesn't care who buys and what happens.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 8, 2013 3:16pm
Oh, I'm not projecting my own anything. My first thought would be the legal responsibilities (handed down by the courts, not me), but perhaps I know too little about child support.gut;1497054 wrote:Is it really that difficult? He's not actually digging deeper - I'm not sure how to phrase it, but at a certain point it becomes non-recourse fucking.
There are no additional repercussions whether he fathers one more child or 20 more. You're projecting your own morals and responsibilities. This guy is flipping burgers - he doesn't care who buys and what happens.
As for morals, I frankly don't give a shit how many kids he has.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Sep 8, 2013 3:33pm
Courts can't take money he doesn't have.
LOL, it's probably not even worth the legal fees for the baby mamma's to go after him for child support.
LOL, it's probably not even worth the legal fees for the baby mamma's to go after him for child support.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Sep 8, 2013 4:37pm
I suppose. Still, the sooner he stops, the sooner the last one turns 18.gut;1497316 wrote:Courts can't take money he doesn't have.
LOL, it's probably not even worth the legal fees for the baby mamma's to go after him for child support.