W
WHbacker
Posts: 6
Dec 27, 2009 6:13pm
Do the Lady Knights have a chance?
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 27, 2009 6:31pm
The edge to Hiland again this year. Knights don't have the firepower to score enough to stay with Hiland. Stuckey will be a load down low for WH to handle, although Arnold will limit one of the Hawks guards on the night. But it's a pick your poison in the backcourt. Maybe Hiland will have an off night, but not likely.
After this year, I see the balance shifting to the West, but that's a long way off for now.
Good luck Knights. If things go well, I should be able to make the game.
After this year, I see the balance shifting to the West, but that's a long way off for now.
Good luck Knights. If things go well, I should be able to make the game.
H
HHfan
Posts: 9
Dec 27, 2009 11:07pm
Good luck Hawks!! I'll be there cheering you on!
newarkcatholicfan
Posts: 3,199
Dec 28, 2009 2:05am
Good luck Hawks
ricola
Posts: 855
Dec 28, 2009 9:22am
I think there's a post in there some where...a little hard to see it among all the puppets and all the string
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 28, 2009 9:54am
NCF......is this on the wrong thread?????
W
WHbacker
Posts: 6
Dec 28, 2009 10:57am
Not sure what NCP is trying to accomplish with that post. Anyways, I think WH has looked really strong so far this season and of course the Hawks always are. I just hope it's a good game-Let's go LADY KNIGHTS!!
Flash
Posts: 1,035
Dec 28, 2009 11:27am
It was posted at 2:00am, may have been carbonated beverage involved. LOL
P
Pariah
Posts: 490
Dec 28, 2009 1:45pm
Perhaps with some hops, yeast, and other familiar ingredients.
Looking forward to tonight's game. Should be interesting.
I believe that WH has a winning record against Hiland all-time. Something like 14-11?
Looking forward to tonight's game. Should be interesting.
I believe that WH has a winning record against Hiland all-time. Something like 14-11?
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 28, 2009 3:43pm
For some reason the series stopped between these two schools in the mid 80's. Why was that???Pariah wrote: Perhaps with some hops, yeast, and other familiar ingredients.
Looking forward to tonight's game. Should be interesting.
I believe that WH has a winning record against Hiland all-time. Something like 14-11?
Mr. Russell
Posts: 422
Dec 28, 2009 6:40pm
Radio at all?
ricola
Posts: 855
Dec 28, 2009 6:43pm
probably wklm (95.3)
H
hhs
Posts: 4
Dec 28, 2009 8:11pm
17-14 hiland at half. Both teams look poor. Refs have ruined any chance the game had to develop by calling 20 first half fouls.
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 28, 2009 8:21pm
Good defenses usually make teams look poor.
me_myself_i
Posts: 108
Dec 28, 2009 8:34pm
Refs getting paid by the foul
WH in trouble with Arnold getting fourth foul
Hiland wouldn't play WH in their glory days but now that they have the good teams they want to play the Knights
WH in trouble with Arnold getting fourth foul
Hiland wouldn't play WH in their glory days but now that they have the good teams they want to play the Knights
Hesston
Posts: 516
Dec 28, 2009 8:57pm
Score?
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 28, 2009 9:00pm
48-29 Hiland wins.
P
Pariah
Posts: 490
Dec 29, 2009 9:16am
Hiland's depth and Arnold's foul trouble were the big factors. WH has to have her on the floor. Very, very nice player.
The officiating was irritating - they were calling it very tight - but other than Arnold's foul problems, I would say it helped WH. They wanted a game in the 30's and the fouls slowed the game down.
14-12 now.
The officiating was irritating - they were calling it very tight - but other than Arnold's foul problems, I would say it helped WH. They wanted a game in the 30's and the fouls slowed the game down.
14-12 now.
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 29, 2009 9:34am
Would be appx 24-12 if someone hadn't walked away from the series.Pariah wrote: Hiland's depth and Arnold's foul trouble were the big factors. WH has to have her on the floor. Very, very nice player.
The officiating was irritating - they were calling it very tight - but other than Arnold's foul problems, I would say it helped WH. They wanted a game in the 30's and the fouls slowed the game down.
14-12 now.
The game went as I figured, with WH not filling the hole as needed. Hiland's pressure was too much.
T
tfloangel
Posts: 188
Dec 29, 2009 10:40am
I'm not arguing that point... but can you honestly say that West Holmes would have wanted to play the Hawks during those years?? It wouldn't have been competitive. This is probably me looking at it from the other side, but I'd say its more that the two schools renewed the rivalry when both decided that it could be competitive and worthwhile. Both teams had had several solid years before they started playing each other againme_myself_i wrote:
Hiland wouldn't play WH in their glory days but now that they have the good teams they want to play the Knights
W
WHbacker
Posts: 6
Dec 29, 2009 11:54am
The first half was very exciting but like you've all said Lindsey Arnold's foul trouble and the refs being awful were a factor. Lindsey Arnold is a great player and the Knights need her at all times. But one person can't be a team and I'm hoping a few other girls step up to the plate and join her. We need to get strong under the hoop and our posts to post up, box out and rebound. We also don't have the strong bench that we need to cover if someone like Lindsey Arnold needs to sit. Good effort girls time to look forward to the next game! GO KNIGHTS
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 29, 2009 12:34pm
Nice spin. Unfortunately, way off base sister. If using your logic, then why are the boys still playing??? I mean, Hiland isn't gaining anything by playing WH, and it has been that way for quite sometime now. They've kept playing because it is a county rivalry, and a great place to socialize with coworkers/friends from cross-county schools. Plus bragging rights for a year.tfloangel wrote:I'm not arguing that point... but can you honestly say that West Holmes would have wanted to play the Hawks during those years?? It wouldn't have been competitive. This is probably me looking at it from the other side, but I'd say its more that the two schools renewed the rivalry when both decided that it could be competitive and worthwhile. Both teams had had several solid years before they started playing each other againme_myself_i wrote:
Hiland wouldn't play WH in their glory days but now that they have the good teams they want to play the Knights
The cycle of sports always changes, and will come to these two teams in the future.
T
tfloangel
Posts: 188
Dec 29, 2009 6:30pm
well, thank you for educating me. I can see now that I was incredibly stupid.
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Dec 29, 2009 9:16pm
Glad to see you're are finally coming around. I was just busting your bonnet a little.tfloangel wrote: well, thank you for educating me. I can see now that I was incredibly stupid.
T
tfloangel
Posts: 188
Dec 29, 2009 9:58pm
yea, i realized that. i'm not always dim