ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 27, 2013 8:20am
Hard for me to guage since I've only ever played 10 teams leagues.
Standard scoring with 2 wr, 2 rb, and a flex spot
QB's: Flacco, Tannehill
RB's: Lynch, Gore, Murray, Mendenhall, F. Jackson, J. Stewart.
WR's: Nelson, Decker, L. Moore, S. Johnson
TE: Gates
K: Vinatieri
Def: Seattle
Standard scoring with 2 wr, 2 rb, and a flex spot
QB's: Flacco, Tannehill
RB's: Lynch, Gore, Murray, Mendenhall, F. Jackson, J. Stewart.
WR's: Nelson, Decker, L. Moore, S. Johnson
TE: Gates
K: Vinatieri
Def: Seattle
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Aug 27, 2013 8:43am
For a 14 team league this team is pretty solid.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 27, 2013 8:45am
it seems weak... then again so does everyones.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Aug 27, 2013 8:54am
If it was PPR id love your WRs, I just don't see them scoring many TDs. RBs look good. When did you draft Flacco? Seems like there had to be someone better available?
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Aug 27, 2013 8:55am
Actually your team looks really good. Your QB is pretty weak I'm guessing you were like the last person to take a QB? But I agree with Rotinaj there had to be someone better haha?
Your RBs would be good even in a 10 team league. WR is a little weak but you have 3 guys who should get at least 800 yards and 5 TDs if not more.
Your RBs would be good even in a 10 team league. WR is a little weak but you have 3 guys who should get at least 800 yards and 5 TDs if not more.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 27, 2013 8:57am
I took flacco at 12. I went rb,rb,rb to start..which i knew was going to leave my other positions weakRotinaj;1491833 wrote:If it was PPR id love your WRs, I just don't see them scoring many TDs. RBs look good. When did you draft Flacco? Seems like there had to be someone better available?
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Aug 27, 2013 12:19pm
RBs are very solid for 14 team league. Which, I guess is expected when you go RB, RB, RB to start.
WRs are a little weak, especially since it isnt PPR, because they will catch a lot, and have some good yardage games. But none of them will be targeted a whole lot in the red-zone the way a true #1 is. Decker should get around 8 TDs just cause Peyton will have 40ish this season. Nelson will have his bombs etc, but isnt going to be a TD target in the red-zone and same with Lance Moore (probably the 3rd option in the red-zone). Johnson is the #1, but its for Buffalo. They are going to have a tough time scoring 30 TDs as a team all year lol.
Id look to upgrade at QB or WR with Gore or Murray...but, if you stand pat you should be alright.
14 team leagues are so thin. Everyone seems weak, so waiver wire pickups become huge.
WRs are a little weak, especially since it isnt PPR, because they will catch a lot, and have some good yardage games. But none of them will be targeted a whole lot in the red-zone the way a true #1 is. Decker should get around 8 TDs just cause Peyton will have 40ish this season. Nelson will have his bombs etc, but isnt going to be a TD target in the red-zone and same with Lance Moore (probably the 3rd option in the red-zone). Johnson is the #1, but its for Buffalo. They are going to have a tough time scoring 30 TDs as a team all year lol.
Id look to upgrade at QB or WR with Gore or Murray...but, if you stand pat you should be alright.
14 team leagues are so thin. Everyone seems weak, so waiver wire pickups become huge.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Aug 28, 2013 1:43am
I predict you finish anywhere from 10-14 in your league. RB's are weak. Gore, although a good RB in real football, is pretty weak in Fantasy. Stewart is hurt, and Fred Jackson will likely be a non-factor. Too many WR's in Green Bay to expect consistent numbers out of Nelson. Decker is easily your best option at WR. Neither QB is very good in Fantasy football. I can't believe you took 3 RB's to start the draft, and didn't get better value. Had to be a big run on RB's, in which it would've been worth taking a better overall player.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 28, 2013 6:01am
I predict you smoked crack before posting this.se-alum;1492250 wrote:I predict you finish anywhere from 10-14 in your league. RB's are weak. Gore, although a good RB in real football, is pretty weak in Fantasy. Stewart is hurt, and Fred Jackson will likely be a non-factor. Too many WR's in Green Bay to expect consistent numbers out of Nelson. Decker is easily your best option at WR. Neither QB is very good in Fantasy football. I can't believe you took 3 RB's to start the draft, and didn't get better value. Had to be a big run on RB's, in which it would've been worth taking a better overall player.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 28, 2013 1:54pm
guy offered me Kaepernick for Mendenhall and Lance Moore
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 28, 2013 2:08pm
I declined it.. im too weak at WR to do that.
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Aug 28, 2013 2:58pm
I probably would have done it. Kap should be quite a bit better than Flacco this year fantasy wise and I am not a Mendenhall or Moore fan.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Aug 28, 2013 3:13pm
I agree with Zwick. It would of left him super thin at WR and in a 14 team league there isn't shit at WR on waivers.Terry_Tate;1492524 wrote:I probably would have done it. Kap should be quite a bit better than Flacco this year fantasy wise and I am not a Mendenhall or Moore fan.
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Aug 28, 2013 4:02pm
Zwick who are the WR's available on waivers? I might have done it depending on what WR I could pick up to replace Moore.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Aug 28, 2013 4:18pm
I can answer that and I am not in his league. It's a 14 team league, there isn't crap on WR waivers right now.Iliketurtles;1492564 wrote:Zwick who are the WR's available on waivers? I might have done it depending on what WR I could pick up to replace Moore.
Even if every team took 4, that's the top 64 WRs gone. More than likely some took 5 so somewhere between 64 and 70 WRs gone.
This isn't a normal 10 team league.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Aug 28, 2013 4:20pm
My bad. Your team is awesome, probably go undefeated. Is that the rating you wanted?ZWICK 4 PREZ;1492256 wrote:I predict you smoked crack before posting this.
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Aug 28, 2013 4:35pm
I'd have done it, dropped Tannehill, and picked up 2 WRs and hoped one of them could perform. Moore wouldn't be a starter over Nelson and Decker so you're giving up a little depth to have a big gain at QB. In a 14 team league where everyone is thin I'd have done that no question.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 28, 2013 4:53pm
se-alum;1492579 wrote:My bad. Your team is awesome, probably go undefeated. Is that the rating you wanted?
No I don't think it's awesome but to say in weak at RB.. Especially in a 14 team league... Is beyond retarded.
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Aug 28, 2013 5:16pm
I know that its a 14 team league there could still be someone there. Nate Washington, Aaron Dobson, Donny Avery, Kenny Stills. All could an ok bye week fell in guys and are ranked around 64th or worse. I'd probably do it as well just because Kaep would have been a better upgrade then what he was giving up.jmog;1492578 wrote:I can answer that and I am not in his league. It's a 14 team league, there isn't crap on WR waivers right now.
Even if every team took 4, that's the top 64 WRs gone. More than likely some took 5 so somewhere between 64 and 70 WRs gone.
This isn't a normal 10 team league.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Aug 28, 2013 5:35pm
Kap is such a huge upgrade over the shit QBs you have you should re-send that proposal lol.
Plus, while Lance Moore is a great play on random weeks, Johnson will be more consistent as the Bills top target (even with crap at QB) and might end up being the better bench WR for you.
And I dont care if its a 14 team league. WRs that late are a crapshoot. There is stuff available, even if we dont see it right now. About 20 WRs will come out of nowhere over the course of the year and become viable options to play in a 14 team league. Its probably the least important position to have depth in going into the year in fantasy, imo.
Plus, while Lance Moore is a great play on random weeks, Johnson will be more consistent as the Bills top target (even with crap at QB) and might end up being the better bench WR for you.
And I dont care if its a 14 team league. WRs that late are a crapshoot. There is stuff available, even if we dont see it right now. About 20 WRs will come out of nowhere over the course of the year and become viable options to play in a 14 team league. Its probably the least important position to have depth in going into the year in fantasy, imo.
ZWICK 4 PREZ
Posts: 7,733
Aug 29, 2013 1:24pm
guy proposed Romo and Kendall Wright for Mendenhall
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Aug 29, 2013 1:36pm
Lol hopefullly no one is your league will be able to veto that. This trade is better than the first one you listed.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1493082 wrote:guy proposed Romo and Kendall Wright for Mendenhall
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Aug 29, 2013 1:55pm
ZWICK 4 PREZ;1493082 wrote:guy proposed Romo and Kendall Wright for Mendenhall
Lol, seriously.Iliketurtles;1493094 wrote:Lol hopefullly no one is your league will be able to veto that. This trade is better than the first one you listed.
Why would anyone want Mendenhall that badly?
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Aug 29, 2013 2:03pm
Maybe they just really need another RB and have another quality QB?
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Aug 29, 2013 2:29pm
I guess cause Mendenhall is suspose to be the starter and who else do they have there now that Ryan Williams is out for the year(I think he is too lazy to go confirm).Laley23;1493104 wrote:Lol, seriously.
Why would anyone want Mendenhall that badly?
Zwick if this does get veto just offer that dude Mendenhall for Romo if he really needs an RB. It would still be a huge upgrade for you lol.