data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29597/2959724f2227cb18a0661af2511898ce4fa6c458" alt="said_aouita's avatar"
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Aug 8, 2013 6:09am
Sports Center announcers say "he should have been wearing his PF flyers" on occasion.
Looked up how much a pair goes for on an online shopping website.
Woah! $55 bucks for these?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbe87/cbe8739291349be85dcfdd0b9e5fb7b6c7bd9620" alt=""
^ These are the Bob Cousy edition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d689a/d689aade3fb295649c126982fd7c6c068433910c" alt=""
The classic retro look is big right now but god damn these shoes probably cost a buck when they were first introduced in the 40's.
Hell of a profit for New Balance (maker of PF Flyers) nowadays.
Would you wear these shoes and pay the $55 bucks?
Looked up how much a pair goes for on an online shopping website.
Woah! $55 bucks for these?
^ These are the Bob Cousy edition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d689a/d689aade3fb295649c126982fd7c6c068433910c" alt=""
The classic retro look is big right now but god damn these shoes probably cost a buck when they were first introduced in the 40's.
Hell of a profit for New Balance (maker of PF Flyers) nowadays.
Would you wear these shoes and pay the $55 bucks?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3074/f30741f67f0b1b117ac5e56a9d66de74e964cd5e" alt="Rotinaj's avatar"
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Aug 8, 2013 6:58am
I'd pay $9 for a pair and only wear them to mow the grass.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb2dd/eb2ddb24099d7f8ff52452d5fdeb88ff25dfb9ee" alt="Automatik's avatar"
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 8, 2013 7:10am
$55 for those shoes is a decent price.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Aug 8, 2013 9:03am
Never could hold their own in a race against a kid in Red Ball Jets.
M
MontyBrunswick
Aug 8, 2013 9:31am
Automatik;1483849 wrote:$55 for those shoes is a decent price.
When you consider the build materials and other similarly priced shoes, it isn't really a decent price.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Aug 8, 2013 9:54am
They are guaranteed to make a kid jump higher and run faster. And yes, $55 for those shoes is complete BS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce14d/ce14df28d581fef2c132c8c500a04771f111e527" alt="wildcats20's avatar"
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Aug 8, 2013 9:56am
*have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb2dd/eb2ddb24099d7f8ff52452d5fdeb88ff25dfb9ee" alt="Automatik's avatar"
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 8, 2013 10:40am
I've seen your regular Chucks go for well over $50+dlazz;1483890 wrote:When you consider the build materials and other similarly priced shoes, it isn't really a decent price.
I don't wear that style anyway....clown shoes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2422/c2422b8d3a5288c1b4c0d3671e4c23dd4237dd1b" alt="hasbeen's avatar"
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Aug 8, 2013 10:40am
I have a pair of the sandlot version(all black with the green PF logo). I bought them drunk my sophomore year of college. I forget how much I paid, but it was less than $55.
vdubb96
Posts: 2,210
Aug 8, 2013 11:32am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/371e0/371e02be5b0f39fabd54a622b15611f5c8d40c4e" alt=""
F
Fred Garvin
Posts: 285
Aug 8, 2013 11:57am
If Benny the Jet wore them to pickle the beast, then they are worth it.
C
cat_lover
Posts: 2,388
Aug 8, 2013 3:19pm
I grew up in the 60's -70's. I wore Red Ball Jets until Junior High School.Then I upgraded to Adidas,Converse All-Stars and my personal favorite Puma "Clydes."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29597/2959724f2227cb18a0661af2511898ce4fa6c458" alt="said_aouita's avatar"
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Aug 8, 2013 5:40pm
You should email ESPN. Maybe they will correct their Sportscenter announcer.wildcats20;1483910 wrote:*have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29597/2959724f2227cb18a0661af2511898ce4fa6c458" alt="said_aouita's avatar"
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Aug 8, 2013 5:41pm
meh'.....gotta go low top only. High top canvas is dumb.vdubb96;1483998 wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2422/c2422b8d3a5288c1b4c0d3671e4c23dd4237dd1b" alt="hasbeen's avatar"
hasbeen
Posts: 6,504
Aug 8, 2013 7:25pm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48a03/48a036aa8f5f258013a86682f531f7f09cf438c1" alt=""
Benny the Jet disagrees.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29597/2959724f2227cb18a0661af2511898ce4fa6c458" alt="said_aouita's avatar"
said_aouita
Posts: 8,532
Aug 8, 2013 10:34pm
i dunno....they look like skinny jean sneakers.hasbeen;1484249 wrote:
Benny the Jet disagrees.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb2dd/eb2ddb24099d7f8ff52452d5fdeb88ff25dfb9ee" alt="Automatik's avatar"
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Aug 9, 2013 9:52pm
Hightop is the only way. Lowtops are for chicks.