Feds lock man in 5x10 room for 5 days without food or water...

Serious Business 28 replies 1,123 views
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 1, 2013 8:53am
He was never arrested or charged with a crime. He just won a $4.1m settlement, paid for by us the taxpayers. Also, Uncle Sam is going to take his cut from it even though he is responsible for the incident. Oh yeah, no one was ever fired over this.

Basically, torture is no big deal.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dea-settlement-20130731,0,5395826.story
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Aug 1, 2013 9:09am
5 days without water is really, really bad. Considering they basically almost killed him, $4.1M sounds reasonable. Although after the lawyer takes his 1/3, and then Uncle Sam takes @40%...he'll pocket @$1.6M

If not for Bear Grylls, I probably wouldn't have thought I could drink my own urine
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Aug 1, 2013 11:08am
I think his post-settlement attorney fee is untaxed. Still doesn't make up for that type of experience, and unfortunately there likely won't be any accountability at the DEA.
G
Gardens35
Posts: 4,929
Aug 1, 2013 11:37am
I'm surprised that no one from the San Diego DEA office needed to use the interrogation room for 5 days.
Scarlet_Buckeye's avatar
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Aug 1, 2013 11:50am
Shouldn't have been smoking marijuana. Not saying the kid deserved to be locked in an interrogation room for 5 days, but kinda goes back to that age old adage... don't put yourself in bad situations. By smoking marijuana, you could be potentially involving yourself in a drug ring. By potentially getting involved in a drug ring, you risk placing yourself in an interrogation room. By placing yourself in an interrogation room, you run the risk of getting trapped in a room with no windows, food, water, etc.

Don't get caught in an interrogation room. Don't smoke marijuana.

That pretty much sounds like the lesson to be learned here, to me.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 1, 2013 11:54am
Scarlet_Buckeye;1481290 wrote:Shouldn't have been smoking marijuana. Not saying the kid deserved to be locked in an interrogation room for 5 days, but kinda goes back to that age old adage... don't put yourself in bad situations. By smoking marijuana, you could be potentially involving yourself in a drug ring. By potentially getting involved in a drug ring, you risk placing yourself in an interrogation room. By placing yourself in an interrogation room, you run the risk of getting trapped in a room with no windows, food, water, etc.

Don't get caught in an interrogation room. Don't smoke marijuana.

That pretty much sounds like the lesson to be learned here, to me.
LOL. No. There is absolutely no excuse for 5 days of torture. None.
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Aug 1, 2013 11:56am
Scarlet_Buckeye;1481290 wrote:Shouldn't have been smoking marijuana. Not saying the kid deserved to be locked in an interrogation room for 5 days, but kinda goes back to that age old adage... don't put yourself in bad situations. By smoking marijuana, you could be potentially involving yourself in a drug ring. By potentially getting involved in a drug ring, you risk placing yourself in an interrogation room. By placing yourself in an interrogation room, you run the risk of getting trapped in a room with no windows, food, water, etc.

Don't get caught in an interrogation room. Don't smoke marijuana.

That pretty much sounds like the lesson to be learned here, to me.
This post brought to you by our sponsor...



For excessive use of the slippery slope fallacy to blame the use of a generally harmless plant that should NOT be illegal in the first place as a way to justify a complete abuse of authority by the DEA.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Aug 1, 2013 11:57am
A cool million for 5 days drinking my own piss? Hmmmmm.....
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Aug 1, 2013 11:57am
America's not for pussys.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 1, 2013 11:58am
LJ;1481297 wrote:A cool million for 5 days drinking my own piss? Hmmmmm.....
Not worth it. Especially after the fed takes their cut. This guy is going to have a lot of problems going forward.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Aug 1, 2013 11:59am
Scarlet_Buckeye;1481290 wrote:Shouldn't have been smoking marijuana. Not saying the kid deserved to be locked in an interrogation room for 5 days, but kinda goes back to that age old adage... don't put yourself in bad situations. By smoking marijuana, you could be potentially involving yourself in a drug ring. By potentially getting involved in a drug ring, you risk placing yourself in an interrogation room. By placing yourself in an interrogation room, you run the risk of getting trapped in a room with no windows, food, water, etc.

Don't get caught in an interrogation room. Don't smoke marijuana.

That pretty much sounds like the lesson to be learned here, to me.
Kinda sounds like the reasoning, cause-and-effct used by the marketing execs for Direct Tv.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Aug 1, 2013 12:00pm
justincredible;1481299 wrote:Not worth it. Especially after the fed takes their cut. This guy is going to have a lot of problems going forward.
He's prob gonna get around $1.5 cash

What if they just said "$300k per day in cash"
Rotinaj's avatar
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Aug 1, 2013 12:01pm
Scarlet_Buckeye;1481290 wrote:Shouldn't have been smoking marijuana. Not saying the kid deserved to be locked in an interrogation room for 5 days, but kinda goes back to that age old adage... don't put yourself in bad situations. By smoking marijuana, you could be potentially involving yourself in a drug ring. By potentially getting involved in a drug ring, you risk placing yourself in an interrogation room. By placing yourself in an interrogation room, you run the risk of getting trapped in a room with no windows, food, water, etc.

Don't get caught in an interrogation room. Don't smoke marijuana.

That pretty much sounds like the lesson to be learned here, to me.
Uhhh, WUT?
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Aug 1, 2013 12:04pm
LJ;1481303 wrote:He's prob gonna get around $1.5 cash

What if they just said "$300k per day in cash"
more like tree-fiddy....
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 1, 2013 12:07pm
LJ;1481303 wrote:He's prob gonna get around $1.5 cash

What if they just said "$300k per day in cash"
I do it for 1 day for a briefcase full of $300k in cash. Maybe 2 for $600k. After that, I'm out.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 1, 2013 12:08pm
Rotinaj;1481304 wrote:Uhhh, WUT?
Look. If you smoke weed you deserve to be tortured. Period. That stuff is dangerous so you need to be taught a lesson.
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Aug 1, 2013 12:31pm
justincredible;1481102 wrote:He was never arrested or charged with a crime. He just won a $4.1m settlement, paid for by us the taxpayers. Also, Uncle Sam is going to take his cut from it even though he is responsible for the incident. Oh yeah, no one was ever fired over this.

Basically, torture is no big deal.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dea-settlement-20130731,0,5395826.story


His settlment isnt taxed. Only punitive damages are taxable. Hope this helps, Mr. Anarchy.

IRC
§ 61 states all income from whatever source derived is taxable, unless specifically excluded by another Code section. IRC § 104 is the exclusion from taxable income provision with respect to lawsuits, settlements, and awards.

The 1996 amendment added to IRC § 104(a)(2) the word physical to the clause “on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness.”•

Therefore, in order for damages to be excludible from income, the judgment or settlement must be derived from personal physical injuries or physical sickness.

justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 1, 2013 12:57pm
Pick6;1481321 wrote:

His settlment isnt taxed. Only punitive damages are taxable. Hope this helps, Mr. Anarchy.

IRC
§ 61 states all income from whatever source derived is taxable, unless specifically excluded by another Code section. IRC § 104 is the exclusion from taxable income provision with respect to lawsuits, settlements, and awards.

The 1996 amendment added to IRC § 104(a)(2) the word physical to the clause “on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness.”•

Therefore, in order for damages to be excludible from income, the judgment or settlement must be derived from personal physical injuries or physical sickness.

According to this article it's muddy. Hope this helps, Mr. Pick6.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2013/08/01/student-detained-5-days-without-food-or-water-by-dea-settles-for-4-1m/
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Aug 1, 2013 1:10pm
justincredible;1481347 wrote:According to this article it's muddy. Hope this helps, Mr. Pick6.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2013/08/01/student-detained-5-days-without-food-or-water-by-dea-settles-for-4-1m/
He won the settlement on maltreatment, correct? Maltreatment is physical abuse. The kid was never formally arrested or charged. He wasnt a prisoner.

His lawyer isnt stupid. That's why they settled for maltreatment and not "unwrongfully jailed" or whatever. Its pretty clear to me.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 1, 2013 1:15pm
Pick6;1481357 wrote:He won the settlement on maltreatment, correct? Maltreatment is physical abuse. The kid was never formally arrested or charged. He wasnt a prisoner.

His lawyer isnt stupid. That's why they settled for maltreatment and not "unwrongfully jailed" or whatever. Its pretty clear to me.
Well, then, I apologize. It will never happen again.
Scarlet_Buckeye's avatar
Scarlet_Buckeye
Posts: 5,264
Aug 1, 2013 5:08pm
thavoice;1481302 wrote:Kinda sounds like the reasoning, cause-and-effct used by the marketing execs for Direct Tv.
Glad someone at least caught it...
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Aug 1, 2013 6:23pm
I don't subscribe to the cause and effect statement but neither side is innocent of wrongdoing.
M
MontyBrunswick
Aug 1, 2013 9:51pm
Con_Alma;1481542 wrote:I don't subscribe to the cause and effect statement but neither side is innocent of wrongdoing.
You don't subscribe to having rational and coherent thoughts, either.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 1, 2013 10:08pm
Scarlet_Buckeye;1481290 wrote:Shouldn't have been smoking marijuana. Not saying the kid deserved to be locked in an interrogation room for 5 days, but kinda goes back to that age old adage... don't put yourself in bad situations. By smoking marijuana, you could be potentially involving yourself in a drug ring. By potentially getting involved in a drug ring, you risk placing yourself in an interrogation room. By placing yourself in an interrogation room, you run the risk of getting trapped in a room with no windows, food, water, etc.

Don't get caught in an interrogation room. Don't smoke marijuana.

That pretty much sounds like the lesson to be learned here, to me.
This is one of the stupidest thing I've ever read...it's crazy to me that people out there actually can say this type of garbage and truly believe it.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Aug 1, 2013 10:08pm
dlazz;1481557 wrote:You don't subscribe to having rational and coherent thoughts, either.

...maybe it's your inability to understand....maybe.