
BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
May 2, 2013 10:04am
I am sure this idea stemmed from way too many alcoholic beverages, but I got to thinking: why aren't all commercial airlines equipped with a huge parachute atop the plane? Barring a huge explosion, wouldn't this virtually save all lives in the case of engine failure and other mechanical malfunctions? I saw that footage of that plane crash the other day and it reminded me to pose this question. Probably a dumb ass idea, but outside of increased cost for the airlines, why isn't this doable? I am sure I am missing something.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 2, 2013 10:06am
Could a parachute support the weight of a jet?

SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 2, 2013 10:09am
justincredible;1437258 wrote:Could a parachute support the weight of a jet?
Yeah, there's no way a parachute could hold the weight of a commercial airliner.
P
Polar Bear 73
Posts: 216
May 2, 2013 10:11am
The parachute would have to be so big, the plane couldn't support the weight of the chute either. It doubt if a chute that size would even be able to deploy.

chicago510
Posts: 5,728
May 2, 2013 10:29am
A Boeing 747 weighs ~400,000 lbs empty and ~800,000 lbs full.
That is pretty hard to overcome with just drag forces.
Like PB said, think about how large the parachute would have to be.
Brings back memories of college physics just thinking about it.
That is pretty hard to overcome with just drag forces.
Like PB said, think about how large the parachute would have to be.
Brings back memories of college physics just thinking about it.

BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
May 2, 2013 10:42am
Yeah, I figured there had to be a logical explanation ... just seemed too easy an answer! Ahhh physics ...
PS, Operation Dumbo drop was pure BS! haha
PS, Operation Dumbo drop was pure BS! haha