I don't really care, but this isn't the first time Google has done something like this. I remember a few years ago there was a big stink because they did a doodle for a non-Christian religious holiday (a Hindu holiday, maybe) but have only ever done secular themed doodles for Christian holidays (Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, etc). Really, it's not that big of a deal that they didn't make one for Easter this year, but making one for Hugo Chavez does seem a bit odd, even for Google.
dlazz;1417439 wrote:I can see people getting all huffy and puffy about it, but I am OK with the non-Easter Google Doodle. It makes way more sense to have a doodle about someone who actually existed.
Are you actually saying that Jesus isn't an actual historical figure? Like, you think he may just be made up and didn't actually exist as a real person? Whether you believe the details of his life (such as the resurrection) as laid out in the gospels and elsewhere is up to you, but making the supposition that he didn't exist is simple ignorance. The actual existence of Jesus is a well confirmed historical fact. Though they may argue about the facts of his life, no historian doubts that a man named Jesus lived and was a powerful rabbi in Israel. He is an actual historic figure. Do you doubt the existence of Caesar? because there almost five times as many ancient texts about the life of Jesus than about the life of Caesar and many were written closer in time to when Jesus actually lived than those about Caesar.