Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Dec 22, 2009 10:09pm
Now lists his top three as Michigan, Tennessee and USF
O
OldDanTucker
Posts: 283
Dec 23, 2009 9:46am
wonder why the de-commit and not even considering stanford anymore
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Dec 23, 2009 12:48pm
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Dec 23, 2009 1:03pm
Any word on when he'll re-commit to somewhere?
T
Tinkertrain
Posts: 407
Dec 23, 2009 9:58pm
I'd be surprised if he end's up at Michigan because I just dont think we have the room for him in this class. I'd much rather take two defensive tackle's or a DT and a Safety than a offensive linemen coming off a knee injury that pretty much ended his senior season before it began.
Michigan is probably going to sign 29 on signing day and we have two silent commit's allready in addition to being in a strong position for top 10 safety Sean Parker.
Michigan is probably going to sign 29 on signing day and we have two silent commit's allready in addition to being in a strong position for top 10 safety Sean Parker.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 23, 2009 10:02pm
He may the be the greatest DT to ever de-commit from Stanford with the possibility of attending Michigan, Tennessee, or USF.
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Dec 23, 2009 10:20pm
You have to take into account that commitments don't mean shit, it's all about who signs. There are always kids who de-commit on signing day.Tinkertrain wrote: I'd be surprised if he end's up at Michigan because I just dont think we have the room for him in this class. I'd much rather take two defensive tackle's or a DT and a Safety than a offensive linemen coming off a knee injury that pretty much ended his senior season before it began.
Michigan is probably going to sign 29 on signing day and we have two silent commit's allready in addition to being in a strong position for top 10 safety Sean Parker.
btw, who do you think the two silent commits are?
T
Tinkertrain
Posts: 407
Dec 23, 2009 10:29pm
If you really want to know what's really going on with the michigan program/recruiting I highly suggest that you send the money and get an insider subcription to Go Blue Wolverine the scout.com Michigan site. It blows rival's out of the water and the quality of information is outstanding!
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Dec 23, 2009 10:32pm
Bullshit.Tinkertrain wrote: If you really want to know what's really going on with the michigan program/recruiting I highly suggest that you send the money and get an insider subcription to Go Blue Wolverine the scout.com Michigan site. It blows rival's out of the water and the quality of information is outstanding!
I subscribe to both and Rivals is FAR better.
T
Tinkertrain
Posts: 407
Dec 23, 2009 10:39pm
If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.
As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
O
OldDanTucker
Posts: 283
Dec 24, 2009 2:33am
agreed scout>>>>>>rivalsTinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.
As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Dec 24, 2009 9:40am
Well are you going to tell us who they are??Tinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.
As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
BTW, Scout says he's an OG, while this thread is saying he's a DT...what is he?
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Dec 24, 2009 10:41am
I don't buy the "Silent commit" thing because things change way too much. How many times have we saw a silent commit sign with a diff. team on LOI day?Tinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.
As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Dec 24, 2009 4:16pm
What is a silent commit? and who has silent committed to UM?
Trueblue23
Posts: 7,463
Dec 25, 2009 7:27am
OT..pkebker wrote:Well are you going to tell us who they are??Tinkertrain wrote: If you subscribe to both then it's your own fault for not knowing who the silent commit's are because it's been stated time after time on the victor's board in the depth chart's.
As far as I'm concerned the inside information that Scout had is far superior to anything that rival's can offer. You see thing's on the scout insider board's earlier than rival's and in many cases MUCH easier.
BTW, Scout says he's an OG, while this thread is saying he's a DT...what is he?
that was my fault, typo
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Dec 25, 2009 7:29pm
thanks...eliminates confusion...