
pmoney25
Posts: 1,787
Jan 24, 2013 4:52pm
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/01/24/unlocking-cellphones-becomes-illegal-saturday/
I do believe the attack on technology is under way. Too much freedom
I do believe the attack on technology is under way. Too much freedom
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
Jan 24, 2013 5:10pm
That's silly. If you own the phone, you should be able to do what you want with it.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 24, 2013 7:23pm
Yay, more laws. :rolleyes:

GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 24, 2013 7:47pm
justincredible;1373995 wrote:Yay, more laws. :rolleyes:
Fuckin' Obama.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 24, 2013 7:48pm
Indeed.GoChiefs;1374013 wrote:Fuckin' federal government.
S
stlouiedipalma
Posts: 1,797
Jan 24, 2013 10:31pm
Sounds to me as if it is just a means of protecting the carriers.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jan 25, 2013 12:59am
True. And I doubt the OEM's are crying that much - if you jump ship you'll have to buy a new phone. The biggest scam going is the subsidy for signing a 2-yr contract - keeps prices artificially high. Otherwise, new high-end phones would go for like $400-$450, and competition would probably drive them lower.stlouiedipalma;1374194 wrote:Sounds to me as if it is just a means of protecting the carriers.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jan 25, 2013 1:58am
Europe disagrees.gut;1374302 wrote:True. And I doubt the OEM's are crying that much - if you jump ship you'll have to buy a new phone. The biggest scam going is the subsidy for signing a 2-yr contract - keeps prices artificially high. Otherwise, new high-end phones would go for like $400-$450, and competition would probably drive them lower.
And this, like a whole bunch of the DMCA is a stupid law. There's absolutely no harm that comes from a device being unlocked. The argument that it protects carriers is silly because of ETFs. If I go to ATT to receive superphone X for $10 with a new service agreement and leave before the 2 years are up because I unlocked the device and want cheaper/better service from another carrier I'm going to be nailed with the ETF to cover the remaining subsidy amount.
I really don't understand the reasoning behind this shit.

O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jan 25, 2013 4:28am
That's like saying that making it illegal to use a dime as a screwdriver is protecting screwdriver manufacturers.stlouiedipalma;1374194 wrote:Sounds to me as if it is just a means of protecting the carriers.
This is an asinine law. My property is my property. If I BUY the phone, then I have paid for it. As such, the carrier has received payment for it. The carrier, then, needs no further protection.
G
Gblock
Jan 25, 2013 8:25am
Isnt it more that they want you to be trapped into a monopoly on using their apps/software? which they then can charge you for and raise the prices on? it definitly seems like you would lose all versatility and freedom on things you can use your phone for

O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jan 25, 2013 11:32am
Eh, as I recall, the app stores that most people use are either the Apple-specific one or the Android specific one. That doesn't change with the unlocking of a phone.Gblock;1374362 wrote:Isnt it more that they want you to be trapped into a monopoly on using their apps/software? which they then can charge you for and raise the prices on? it definitly seems like you would lose all versatility and freedom on things you can use your phone for