Unlocking Cell Phone now illegal

Home Archive Politics Unlocking Cell Phone now illegal
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Jan 24, 2013 5:10 PM
That's silly. If you own the phone, you should be able to do what you want with it.
Jan 24, 2013 5:10pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jan 24, 2013 7:23 PM
Yay, more laws. :rolleyes:
Jan 24, 2013 7:23pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Jan 24, 2013 7:47 PM
justincredible;1373995 wrote:Yay, more laws. :rolleyes:

Fuckin' Obama.
Jan 24, 2013 7:47pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jan 24, 2013 7:48 PM
GoChiefs;1374013 wrote:Fuckin' federal government.
Indeed.
Jan 24, 2013 7:48pm
S

stlouiedipalma

Senior Member

1,797 posts
Jan 24, 2013 10:31 PM
Sounds to me as if it is just a means of protecting the carriers.
Jan 24, 2013 10:31pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Jan 25, 2013 12:59 AM
stlouiedipalma;1374194 wrote:Sounds to me as if it is just a means of protecting the carriers.
True. And I doubt the OEM's are crying that much - if you jump ship you'll have to buy a new phone. The biggest scam going is the subsidy for signing a 2-yr contract - keeps prices artificially high. Otherwise, new high-end phones would go for like $400-$450, and competition would probably drive them lower.
Jan 25, 2013 12:59am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jan 25, 2013 1:58 AM
gut;1374302 wrote:True. And I doubt the OEM's are crying that much - if you jump ship you'll have to buy a new phone. The biggest scam going is the subsidy for signing a 2-yr contract - keeps prices artificially high. Otherwise, new high-end phones would go for like $400-$450, and competition would probably drive them lower.
Europe disagrees.

And this, like a whole bunch of the DMCA is a stupid law. There's absolutely no harm that comes from a device being unlocked. The argument that it protects carriers is silly because of ETFs. If I go to ATT to receive superphone X for $10 with a new service agreement and leave before the 2 years are up because I unlocked the device and want cheaper/better service from another carrier I'm going to be nailed with the ETF to cover the remaining subsidy amount.

I really don't understand the reasoning behind this shit.
Jan 25, 2013 1:58am
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Jan 25, 2013 4:28 AM
stlouiedipalma;1374194 wrote:Sounds to me as if it is just a means of protecting the carriers.
That's like saying that making it illegal to use a dime as a screwdriver is protecting screwdriver manufacturers.

This is an asinine law. My property is my property. If I BUY the phone, then I have paid for it. As such, the carrier has received payment for it. The carrier, then, needs no further protection.
Jan 25, 2013 4:28am
G

Gblock

Jan 25, 2013 8:25 AM
Isnt it more that they want you to be trapped into a monopoly on using their apps/software? which they then can charge you for and raise the prices on? it definitly seems like you would lose all versatility and freedom on things you can use your phone for
Jan 25, 2013 8:25am
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Jan 25, 2013 11:32 AM
Gblock;1374362 wrote:Isnt it more that they want you to be trapped into a monopoly on using their apps/software? which they then can charge you for and raise the prices on? it definitly seems like you would lose all versatility and freedom on things you can use your phone for
Eh, as I recall, the app stores that most people use are either the Apple-specific one or the Android specific one. That doesn't change with the unlocking of a phone.
Jan 25, 2013 11:32am