
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 24, 2013 3:46pm
Raw Dawgin' it has reported a post.
Reason:
Forum: College Football
Assigned Moderators: Fab1b
Posted by: karen lotz
Original Content:
Reason:
Post: T'eo's girlfriend death a hoax?Remember when i was banned for saying ETB sister liked black people? I'm pretty sure this is the same thing, except worse.
Forum: College Football
Assigned Moderators: Fab1b
Posted by: karen lotz
Original Content:
Raw Dawgin' it;1373881 wrote:We can't all be invested in this like Lotz.
you seem to be invested pretty heavily. also seem to have some deep problems with homosexuality, probably because your dad played with you when he gave you a bath.

ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 24, 2013 3:47pm
Lotz has completely lost his shit over this Teo thing

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 24, 2013 3:48pm
I already unapproved the post and said to cut out personal attacks. This could be infraction worthy, but to be fair slight personal attacks had already been happening on the thread prior to that comment which may have provoked this.

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 24, 2013 3:51pm
Two immediate PM's.
RDI
Lotz
RDI
I was banned for saying ETBs sister liked black dudes and you just delete his post for that? c'mon man!
Lotz
don't delete just my posts...
if it wasn't you, pass that along to whoever did.

Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jan 24, 2013 3:54pm
It's provided a good bit of hilarity for me. I hope he just gets more crazy over it, to be honest, just for the lulz it consistently brings.ts1227;1373891 wrote:Lotz has completely lost his shit over this Teo thing

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 24, 2013 3:58pm
As far as what to do regarding this specific post and others to clean up the thread.
1) Is this worthy of an infraction? Standing alone I'd say yes, but I think there were a lot of slights being thrown around prior to this that instigated this kind of thing. I think the in thread warning is probably enough.
2) Do we need to go through that thread and unapprove other posts or just try to keep out the personal attacks going forward?
1) Is this worthy of an infraction? Standing alone I'd say yes, but I think there were a lot of slights being thrown around prior to this that instigated this kind of thing. I think the in thread warning is probably enough.
2) Do we need to go through that thread and unapprove other posts or just try to keep out the personal attacks going forward?

Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jan 24, 2013 4:40pm
I'd honestly have to say that as far as #1 goes, if that is, Ernest probably earned about 20 retroactive infractions, since I don't know that he does anything whatsoever on that thread other than stalk/troll Karen.Fly4Fun;1373901 wrote:As far as what to do regarding this specific post and others to clean up the thread.
1) Is this worthy of an infraction? Standing alone I'd say yes, but I think there were a lot of slights being thrown around prior to this that instigated this kind of thing. I think the in thread warning is probably enough.
2) Do we need to go through that thread and unapprove other posts or just try to keep out the personal attacks going forward?
So, I'd go with #2, where we just try to keep people from getting personal. As regardless of how brain-damaged Lotz is acting in regards to Te'o, it wouldn't really be cool to bust him for being a douche when others have been total douches to him on the same thread.

ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 24, 2013 7:25pm
If it's that bad, you can always blow it up (lock it) and restart

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 24, 2013 8:58pm
I just went back two more pages and unapproved personal attacks and a few completely irrelevant posts subsequent to my warning. I'll try to keep an eye on this thread in the future.

ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 24, 2013 9:01pm
I feel like arguing with the wonder twin douches who made the comment "that's all you did?" when you gave a verbal.
They can't prove or disprove if anyone was infracted or not, but then they'll ask me to prove it and I can't, lol.
They can't prove or disprove if anyone was infracted or not, but then they'll ask me to prove it and I can't, lol.

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 24, 2013 9:08pm
Ya, no matter what I do I'm in the wrong according to those guys.

se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 25, 2013 8:05am
Lotz should've at least been thread banned for that one.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 25, 2013 10:30am
Got this PM from RDI this morning.
I think it is infraction worthy on its own but I haven't read through the thread. If the thread was already a shit show of attacks I'd say just go through and clean it up and issue a warning that any further attacks will result in an infraction/basement ban and/or thread ban.How come I was banned for saying ETBs sister likes black guys and Lotz's post about my dad molesting me was just taken down? I asked Fly but he didn't give me an answer.
Just different circumstances? Personally, I view busting someones chops different than flat out attacking them.

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 25, 2013 10:59am
ETB and RDI were both antagonizing Karen before Karen's comment in my opinion. Which is why I already did what you suggested (cleaning it up, and issuing a warning). If others want to take a look at the thread and have a different opinion that's fine by me.justincredible;1374448 wrote:Got this PM from RDI this morning.
I think it is infraction worthy on its own but I haven't read through the thread. If the thread was already a shit show of attacks I'd say just go through and clean it up and issue a warning that any further attacks will result in an infraction/basement ban and/or thread ban.
But RDI and ETB definitely made it personal before Lotz did. RDI had a few comments before Lotz's, one was referencing lotz's sister (not sure if Lotz has one), another calls him a girl, another implies Lotz is gay by saying Te'o is his boy toy. (Also, I'm under the assumption Lotz is indeed a guy).
While not 1 of RDI's single posts was as bad necessarily as Lotz's, RDI was making it personal for a few posts before Lotz responded in kind.
That's how I view this situation at least.

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 25, 2013 11:00am
Also, I did answer RDI. I said we're discussing it in the mod forum.justincredible;1374448 wrote:Got this PM from RDI this morning.
I think it is infraction worthy on its own but I haven't read through the thread. If the thread was already a shit show of attacks I'd say just go through and clean it up and issue a warning that any further attacks will result in an infraction/basement ban and/or thread ban.