Reddit Pioneer Aaron Swartz Commits Suicide

Home Archive Serious Business Reddit Pioneer Aaron Swartz Commits Suicide
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 12, 2013 3:12 PM
...at 26 years old....damn

http://now.msn.com/aaron-swartz-commits-suicide/
Aaron Swartz, one of the minds behind online social news giant Reddit, killed himself in New York City Friday. The 26-year-old was a precocious coding talent, co-authoring the first generation of RSS — a core part of the modern Internet experience — at 14 years old. Swartz joined Reddit through a merger with his own Infogami service in 2006. After leaving Reddit, he devoted himself to Internet activism, co-founding the advocacy group demandprogress.org. Swartz was facing legal pressures, after his 2011 indictment for allegedly mass-downloading documents from the JSTOR academic archive with intent to distribute them. Swartz was open about his ongoing battle with severe depression and other medical problems. His suicide was confirmed by an uncle, Michael Wolf. [Source]
Jan 12, 2013 3:12pm
S

sportchampps

Senior Member

7,361 posts
Jan 13, 2013 12:24 AM
Sad... He shouldn't have even been charged with a felony but aomeone wanted to make a name off of him.
Jan 13, 2013 12:24am
M

MontyBrunswick

Jan 13, 2013 2:41 PM
sportchampps;1364882 wrote:He shouldn't have even been charged with a felony
Yes, he should have. He was stealing.
Jan 13, 2013 2:41pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jan 13, 2013 7:47 PM
dlazz;1365182 wrote:Yes, he should have. He was stealing.
There is no way he should've been facing 35 years in prison. Especially since the place he was "stealing" from didn't pursue charges and was in the process of making them publicly accessible anyway.
Jan 13, 2013 7:47pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jan 13, 2013 8:34 PM
dlazz;1365182 wrote:Yes, he should have. He was stealing.
A felony really?
Jan 13, 2013 8:34pm
S

sportchampps

Senior Member

7,361 posts
Jan 13, 2013 9:25 PM
What he did wasn't illegal at most all he did was trespass
Jan 13, 2013 9:25pm
-Society-'s avatar

-Society-

Senior Member

1,348 posts
Jan 13, 2013 9:38 PM
sportchampps;1365616 wrote:What he did wasn't illegal at most all he did was trespass
Good to know that "at most all he did was trespass" isn't illegal.
Jan 13, 2013 9:38pm
M

MontyBrunswick

Jan 13, 2013 9:51 PM
justincredible;1365538 wrote:There is no way he should've been facing 35 years in prison. Especially since the place he was "stealing" from didn't pursue charges and was in the process of making them publicly accessible anyway.
Copyright infringement cases always bring absurd charges like that when they're on a grand scale. He was more or less grabbing thousands of copyrighted journals and posting them for free. That is a felony since he was doing it on a grand-scale without regard.

Yes, that's illegal.
Yes, he should've gotten in trouble.

It doesn't matter if the company was getting ready to release them anyway. Breaking the law is breaking the law.
Jan 13, 2013 9:51pm
hasbeen's avatar

hasbeen

Excuse me, Flo?

6,504 posts
Jan 13, 2013 11:04 PM
dlazz;1365633 wrote: Breaking the law is breaking the law.
/SVF'd
Jan 13, 2013 11:04pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jan 13, 2013 11:17 PM
dlazz;1365633 wrote:Copyright infringement cases always bring absurd charges like that when they're on a grand scale. He was more or less grabbing thousands of copyrighted journals and posting them for free. That is a felony since he was doing it on a grand-scale without regard.

Yes, that's illegal.
Yes, he should've gotten in trouble.

It doesn't matter if the company was getting ready to release them anyway. Breaking the law is breaking the law.
This is a pretty absurd statement. Rape isn't the same as stealing a pack of gum which isn't the same as tax fraud which isn't the same as jaywalking. Breaking the law isn't breaking the law, even the law recognizes that.

"That is a felony since he was doing it on a grand-scale without regard."

Society is not better off by having this guy behind bars for 35 years for distributing (alledgedly) academic journals.
Jan 13, 2013 11:17pm
-Society-'s avatar

-Society-

Senior Member

1,348 posts
Jan 13, 2013 11:25 PM
I Wear Pants;1365670 wrote: Society is not better off by having this guy behind bars for 35 years for distributing (alledgedly) academic journals.
He didn't think so either.
Jan 13, 2013 11:25pm
M

MontyBrunswick

Jan 14, 2013 7:50 AM
I Wear Pants;1365670 wrote:This is a pretty absurd statement.
An absurd statement, but only because you misinterpreted it. I wasn't saying rape = stealing a pack of gum. I was saying that level of theft is well worth a felony.
Jan 14, 2013 7:50am
S

sportchampps

Senior Member

7,361 posts
Jan 14, 2013 9:52 AM
He never distributed the articles.
Jan 14, 2013 9:52am
M

MontyBrunswick

Jan 14, 2013 9:56 AM
sportchampps;1365770 wrote:He never distributed the articles.
No, but he still broke the law.
He faced 13 felony charges, including wire fraud, computer fraud and unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer.
Jan 14, 2013 9:56am
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Jan 14, 2013 11:41 AM
dlazz;1365774 wrote:No, but he still broke the law.
Allegedly.
Jan 14, 2013 11:41am
M

MontyBrunswick

Jan 14, 2013 11:42 AM
Indeed.
Jan 14, 2013 11:42am
derek bomar's avatar

derek bomar

Senior Member

3,722 posts
Jan 14, 2013 11:50 AM
***** took the easy road
Jan 14, 2013 11:50am