majorspark;1844642 wrote:Feloniously leak selected portions with the intent of taking out a political opponent and inflicting political damage on the current administration.

Ahhh c'mon ............they wouldn't do that.

So... is Susan Rice an attention whore or just a gullible dupe?

CenterBHSFan;1845405 wrote:So... is Susan Rice an attention whore or just a gullible dupe?

She is an idiot, but what is the new story of the day?

like_that;1845408 wrote:She is an idiot, but what is the new story of the day?

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-04-03/top-obama-adviser-sought-names-of-trump-associates-in-intel

CenterBHSFan;1845405 wrote:So... is Susan Rice an attention whore or just a gullible dupe?

I am going with calculating partisan operative.

I think both sides are biting off more than they can chew with this shit. They better be careful.

I'm not sure, but I'm going to guess transition activities always include conversations with domestic AND foreign entities. It's not technically legal, and mostly makes sense as a policy, but I'm sure stuff like what Flynn did happens with every incoming administration.

You're not supposed to unmask those US citizens, period. If some concern (which the left was very capable of working itself into, not unlike birthergate) about Trump and his team weighed on that choice to unmask, that only further heightens the problem into a political one.

It's all sounding more and more like you're typical community organizer "Rules for Radicals" - you lost your election and your legacy is going to be dismantled, all you can do is hope to undermine and invalidate the agenda any way you can.

majorspark;1845413 wrote:I am going with calculating partisan operative.

I like how she lied through her teeth, again, about not knowing anything. In her defense, maybe she is just a decent, honest person who struggled to keep up with Obama and Clinton.

I'm thinking Trump should have the IRS audit her every year for life.

Multiple sources tell Fox News that Susan Rice, former national security adviser under then-President Barack Obama, requested to unmask the names of Trump transition officials caught up in surveillance.

https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


CNN: racing MSNBC to the bottom.

QuakerOats;1845770 wrote:https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view


CNN: racing MSNBC to the bottom.

And what we are seeing clear as day, now, is that the mainstream media are all completely in the tank for the Dems, never criticizing the Obama administration and covering their eyes and ears at every scandal.

Suffice to say that CNN can do whatever they like...that doesn't change the fact that Ms. Rice has a problem on her hands.

QuakerOats;1845770 wrote:https://news.grabien.com/story-cnn-goes-rampage-against-susan-rice-bombshell-instructs-view

CNN: racing MSNBC to the bottom.

CNN has long surpassed MSNBC as the bottom of the pond.
As per the article you linked:

UPDATE: In an interview on MSNBC addressing this story, Susan Rice has now confirmed she unmasked Trump campaign officials, but is denying doing so for political reasons.

UPDATE: [FONT=&quot]In an interview on MSNBC addressing this story, [/FONT]Susan Rice has now confirmed[FONT=&quot] she unmasked Trump campaign officials, but is [/FONT][FONT=&quot]denying doing so for political reasons[/FONT][FONT=&quot].[/FONT]

LOL. A week ago she denied knowing anything about unmasking of Trump officials.

majorspark;1845826 wrote:LOL. A week ago she denied knowing anything about unmasking of Trump officials.

It's pretty clear, with that EO Obama signed in his final days allowing unprecedented intel sharing between groups, that it was political. Why would you be worried about the Trump team "erasing" the data when that data is not admissible? You couldn't use that intel in any prosecution because it would have been illegally collected without a warrant. So the only logical explanation is they set it up for that information to be leaked with the sole purpose to damage the Trump administration.

There's still been nothing found with respect to collusion between the Trump team and Russia. This whole other thing was merely to provide some smoke so their sympathizers in the media could shout "FIRE! FIRE!".

Gender pay equality day today... the hoax continues. Morons


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

iclfan2;1845865 wrote:Gender pay equality day today... the hoax continues. Morons


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hopefully Susan Rice was paid considerably less than the average male spy.

fish82;1845818 wrote:Suffice to say that CNN can do whatever they like...that doesn't change the fact that Ms. Rice has a problem on her hands.

Indeed!

Susan Rice is a political scum hack

iclfan2;1845865 wrote:Gender pay equality day today... the hoax continues. Morons

I happened to read an article about this on Engadget (which, for some reason, has decided they're qualified to write about anything other than the technology part of tech).

Comments were LOL hilarious with your typical SJW woman accusing detractors of "mansplaining" when it was pointed out the gap virtually disappears when controlled for all factors. Then you had the artful deflection to "well, we need more and longer paid maternity leave".

Yea, it's pretty funny to hear the uneducated and ignorant people try to defend flawed logic. The best part is people like Keith Ellison and other dumbass congress people (looking at you Warren) also try to push it as fact.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

iclfan2;1845900 wrote:Yea, it's pretty funny to hear the uneducated and ignorant people try to defend flawed logic. The best part is people like Keith Ellison and other dumbass congress people (looking at you Warren) also try to push it as fact.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

To be fair, it is a fact in Warren's office.

I can't help but recall the article in the WaPo where a writer said:
"What did Obama know and when did he know it? Answer: Not much and about a minute ago."

I have a feeling that this will be called into play before long.

The way the dems are doing politics......Trump wins again easily om 2020

CenterBHSFan;1845934 wrote:I can't help but recall the article in the WaPo where a writer said:
"What did Obama know and when did he know it? Answer: Not much and about a minute ago."

I have a feeling that this will be called into play before long.

I honestly doubt anything comes out of this. There are a lot of hypocrites in politics, but none more than the Obama sheep (I classify the media into the sheep group as well). They will do anything to protect his legacy. They are more concerned with treating him like a star and worrying about his "ranking" instead of knowing the truth.

Remember when truth mattered? Good times.