Now that is funny, but oh so true to what has been going on.justincredible;1514753 wrote:
justincredible;1514249 wrote:
Excellent!justincredible;1514244 wrote:
They forgot a caricature of Obama, holding a copy of Obamacare, as well as the rest of the democratic party.BoatShoes;1515362 wrote:
No they forgot that the GOP is their with the Tea Party but only because the Tea Party has a gun to the GOP's head.ernest_t_bass;1515368 wrote:They forgot a caricature of Obama, holding a copy of Obamacare, as well as the rest of the democratic party.
Funny, but who tried to change the 2nd Amendment?justincredible;1516080 wrote:
Lots have folks in Washington have infringed on the 2A over the years, most recently the guy in the top pane. But don't mind me, I'm just a gun nut that doesn't care about dead children. Or something.I Wear Pants;1516086 wrote:Funny, but who tried to change the 2nd Amendment?
The 2nd Amendment says that no restrictions can be placed on gun ownership or the types of guns people are allowed?justincredible;1516091 wrote:Lots have folks in Washington have infringed on the 2A over the years, most recently the guy in the top pane. But don't mind me, I'm just a gun nut that doesn't care about dead children. Or something.
What part of "shall not be infringed" is difficult for you?I Wear Pants;1516093 wrote:The 2nd Amendment says that no restrictions can be placed on gun ownership or the types of guns people are allowed?
It would appear so. To restrict would be to infringe. Perhaps not fully, but certainly in part.I Wear Pants;1516093 wrote:The 2nd Amendment says that no restrictions can be placed on gun ownership or the types of guns people are allowed?
O-Trap;1516177 wrote:To restrict would be to infringe. Perhaps not fully, but certainly in part.
For open-minded and enlightened liberals, wording in the Constitution is subject to broad interpretation and not to be taken literally. It is a living, breathing document written by the original Tea Party (a bunch of bigoted slave-owning gray haired white males) over 226 years ago.superman;1516163 wrote:What part of "shall not be infringed" is difficult for you?
believer;1516229 wrote:...broad interpretation and not to be taken literally. It is a living, breathing document written by the original Tea Party (a bunch of bigoted slave-owning gray haired white males) over 226 years ago.