data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Oct 13, 2012 12:39am
Thoughts? I like...
The under 59 in Texas/Oklahoma
Wisconsin +1 at Purdue
The over 47 in Kansas State/Iowa State
The over 49 in Illinois/Michigan
Oregon State +6 at Brigham Young
West Virginia -4 at Texas Tech
Arkansas -17 vs Kentucky
South Carolina +3 at Louisiana State
New Mexico -2 at Hawaii
The under 59 in Texas/Oklahoma
Wisconsin +1 at Purdue
The over 47 in Kansas State/Iowa State
The over 49 in Illinois/Michigan
Oregon State +6 at Brigham Young
West Virginia -4 at Texas Tech
Arkansas -17 vs Kentucky
South Carolina +3 at Louisiana State
New Mexico -2 at Hawaii
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bea38/bea3829fd9b5f5513575028759743363f1e617f8" alt="Terry_Tate's avatar"
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Oct 13, 2012 4:24pm
I took Kent State -3 against Army. Won by 14.
I've got West Virginia -5. Not looking good right now but its early.
I've got West Virginia -5. Not looking good right now but its early.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bea38/bea3829fd9b5f5513575028759743363f1e617f8" alt="Terry_Tate's avatar"
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Oct 13, 2012 5:11pm
Terry_Tate;1294073 wrote:I've got West Virginia -5. Not looking good right now but its early.
That's a loss.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4a2/3e4a2077c1f3e45dab8e238c44b7bb2b3ea4d05c" alt="Mulva's avatar"
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Oct 13, 2012 5:18pm
I actually like LSU -3 tonight.
I had Wisconsin too, and have Stanford +9.5.
I had Wisconsin too, and have Stanford +9.5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/984ae/984ae5d8f9c1b63331902291e955b69ad8eefd60" alt="GoChiefs's avatar"
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Oct 13, 2012 5:58pm
I had Michigan at -25, Stanford at +11, and WVU at -6. Screw you WVU.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Oct 13, 2012 11:56pm
Question for some.
I had a 3-team Parlay with Arkansas -17 over Kentucky.
Game was called in the 3rd, UK down 49-7, after their administration asked for it to end.
Bet was returned with "no action" and wasn't fully paid. I won the other 2 games in the Parlay. Shouldn't it still be credited? Clearly it was going to be covered...
I had a 3-team Parlay with Arkansas -17 over Kentucky.
Game was called in the 3rd, UK down 49-7, after their administration asked for it to end.
Bet was returned with "no action" and wasn't fully paid. I won the other 2 games in the Parlay. Shouldn't it still be credited? Clearly it was going to be covered...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4a2/3e4a2077c1f3e45dab8e238c44b7bb2b3ea4d05c" alt="Mulva's avatar"
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Oct 14, 2012 12:05am
Meh. Since it wasn't official, I would say you should be credited for 2 wins and a push in the parlay, not full odds. As much as it sucks, I'm almost positive that will be exactly what the company will have laid out in the rules. A game isn't complete until it's complete.Azubuike24;1294671 wrote:Question for some.
I had a 3-team Parlay with Arkansas -17 over Kentucky.
Game was called in the 3rd, UK down 49-7, after their administration asked for it to end.
Bet was returned with "no action" and wasn't fully paid. I won the other 2 games in the Parlay. Shouldn't it still be credited? Clearly it was going to be covered...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Oct 14, 2012 12:08am
I'm just pissed because it was a shoe-in bet...I can see the argument but a 2-team parlay win vs a 3-team is a big difference.
$12 to win $40 instead of $12 to win $69...weak.
$12 to win $40 instead of $12 to win $69...weak.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4a2/3e4a2077c1f3e45dab8e238c44b7bb2b3ea4d05c" alt="Mulva's avatar"
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Oct 14, 2012 12:14am
I completely agree with your logic, but also think you have 0 complaint because every gambling company will have those terms laid out. It's shitty, but on the flipside it would have been a push if you were behind too. At least those rules are laid out ahead of time.Azubuike24;1294688 wrote:I'm just pissed because it was a shoe-in bet...I can see the argument but a 2-team parlay win vs a 3-team is a big difference.
$12 to win $40 instead of $12 to win $69...weak.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d73c0/d73c02d7a31cddb4212d48a3676b77a6e5f0632f" alt="jpake1's avatar"
jpake1
Posts: 2,389
Oct 15, 2012 7:37pm
Any good lines that you've seen so far?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Oct 15, 2012 8:50pm
Iowa State +14 at Oklahoma State. I can't figure this one out???
Stanford -3 at California
Louisville -7 vs South Florida
Toledo +7 vs Cincinnati
Kansas State +3 at West Virginia
Stanford -3 at California
Louisville -7 vs South Florida
Toledo +7 vs Cincinnati
Kansas State +3 at West Virginia