like_that;1293061 wrote:Meh, if they played a 100 game series, the Giants would have taken 60.
Reds won the season series 6-5 if you count this series.
like_that;1293061 wrote:Meh, if they played a 100 game series, the Giants would have taken 60.
Not worried about season ball. I am talking about when push comes to shove I would have taken the Giants every time. I am actually surprised the series went 5 tbh.wildcats20;1293064 wrote:Reds won the season series 6-5 if you count this series.
wildcats20;1293064 wrote:Reds won the season series 6-5 if you count this series.
like_that;1293065 wrote:Not worried about season ball. I am talking about when push comes to shove I would have taken the Giants every time. I am actually surprised the series went 5 tbh.
Really? Because when it actually mattered in october (as opposed to the dog days of summer) the right team won.jordo212000;1293066 wrote:Only like_that's alternative reality matters
haha, I am well aware. I was surprised they took the 2-0 lead. Not sure what is so confusing about that. I had the Giants taking the series in 4 games at the most, but they played like crap the first two games. They bounced back. Good playoff teams take care of the overrated playoff teams, and they did.jordo212000;1293068 wrote:Huh? The Reds were leading the series 2-0 before an epic collapse? Haha
Not really that epic or surprising considering Dusty's history.jordo212000;1293068 wrote:Huh? The Reds were leading the series 2-0 before an epic collapse? Haha
like_that;1293065 wrote:Not worried about season ball. I am talking about when push comes to shove I would have taken the Giants every time. I am actually surprised the series went 5 tbh.
like_that;1293072 wrote:haha, I am well aware. I was surprised they took the 2-0 lead. Not sure what is so confusing about that. I had the Giants taking the series in 4 games at the most, but they played like crap the first two games. They bounced back. Good playoff teams take care of the overrated playoff teams, and they did.
Just providing an analogy to explain how much better I thought the Giants were.wildcats20;1293074 wrote:No you were talking about a 100 game series.
Commander of Awesome;1293073 wrote:Not really that epic or surprising considering Dusty's history.
Giants would have probably had the same amount of wins playing in the central. I think Washington gets 100 wins this season in the central.jordo212000;1293076 wrote:They played 162 games and almost won the NL pennant? How were they a fluke?
If you were calling the Giants to win this series, I hope you placed some bets because you would have won a lot of money
wildcats20;1293074 wrote:No you were talking about a 100 game series.
Another reason why I didn't think the reds were going anywhere in the playoffs.Commander of Awesome;1293073 wrote:Not really that epic or surprising considering Dusty's history.
like_that;1293079 wrote:Giants would have probably had the same amount of wins playing in the central. I think Washington gets 100 wins this season in the central.
Well aware, besides the cards the NL central is pretty weak.jordo212000;1293083 wrote:cough cough the NL Central had two teams in the NLDS.
East had 1 and 1 West had 1
like_that;1293086 wrote:Well aware, besides the cards the NL central is pretty weak.
Pretty shitty team until the last month. Not really impressed. Would take the other 2 divisions any day of the week over the central.jordo212000;1293092 wrote:Milwaukee won 83 games and was in the wild card hunt up until the final week of the season but ok
TedSheckler;1292793 wrote:Fuck shit mother fucker **** sucking asshole piece of shit dammit son of a bitch fuck
I agree, its my fault. I should of came to play.Classyposter58;1293344 wrote:You can blame Dusty all you want but SF came to play and you didn't. Can't win one of 3 home games and you deserve to be eliminated. Have fun this winter