10/13: #8 Ohio State def. Indiana, 52-49

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ 10/13: #8 Ohio State def. Indiana, 52-49
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 10:13 AM
FatHobbit;1294786 wrote:Wow, the defense just isn't very good. They give up way too many big plays. The offense can run the ball ok and every now and then they hit a home run with a pass. The special teams are average and punt protection is atrocious. We are not a top ten team. The only reason we're undefeated is because we've played crap teams...
reps
Rotinaj;1294806 wrote:OSU is actually lucky they have the Bowl ban. Would lose by at least 2 TDs against whoever they played in the Rose Bowl.
smh
Oct 14, 2012 10:13am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 14, 2012 10:17 AM
ccrunner609;1294839 wrote:yeah its sad to see a team that knows they are going to win so the D just plays a shitty game.
Haha. Ok dude.

ccrunner609;1294839 wrote: I want to see a big offense and a good defense
Well no shit. What fan/coach/player doesn't? But you want track meets. I want solid football, defense included.
Oct 14, 2012 10:17am
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Oct 14, 2012 10:43 AM
vball10set;1294844 wrote:reps



smh
I shouldn't of "at least" but I really do think they'd lose by about 14. You really think they can hang against the better teams in the country with that D?
Oct 14, 2012 10:43am
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Oct 14, 2012 10:45 AM
It also makes me lol that you rep that post but shake your head at mine. Makes little sense.
Oct 14, 2012 10:45am
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Oct 14, 2012 10:46 AM
USC or Oregon would wax that ass.


The term "SMH" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
Oct 14, 2012 10:46am
S

Sonofanump

Oct 14, 2012 1:42 PM
Thread full of epic.
Oct 14, 2012 1:42pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 2:18 PM
Rotinaj;1294862 wrote:It also makes me lol that you rep that post but shake your head at mine. Makes little sense.
Because he posted facts based on what he saw and what actually happened, while you talked in hyperbole and conjecture...makes perfect sense to me ;)
Oct 14, 2012 2:18pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 2:22 PM
Automatik;1294864 wrote:USC or Oregon would wax that ass.


The term "SMH" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh
Oct 14, 2012 2:22pm
Fly4Fun's avatar

Fly4Fun

Senior Member

7,730 posts
Oct 14, 2012 2:34 PM
vball10set;1295114 wrote:Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh
To be fair, those OSU teams had a defense.
Oct 14, 2012 2:34pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Oct 14, 2012 2:36 PM
vball10set;1295114 wrote:Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh


In no way do either of those squads compare to the current defense. It's actually borderline insulting to even mention the '02 defense in the same discussion.
Oct 14, 2012 2:36pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 2:37 PM
Fly4Fun;1295118 wrote:To be fair, those OSU teams had a defense.
True, but I can't stand it when someone says this team "would do this" or "would do that" to a team, when as anyone who watches college football with any regularity knows that, on any given day....
Oct 14, 2012 2:37pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 2:38 PM
Automatik;1295120 wrote:In no way do either of those squads compare to the current defense. It's actually borderline insulting to even mention the '02 defense in the same discussion.
see post #337 :rolleyes:
Oct 14, 2012 2:38pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 2:40 PM
Automatik;1295120 wrote:In no way do either of those squads compare to the current defense. It's actually borderline insulting to even mention the '02 defense in the same discussion.
I wasn't comparing defenses, I was merely stating that those teams "didn't match up" and "didn't stand much of a chance" against Oregon and Miami, respectively, either.
Oct 14, 2012 2:40pm
GoChiefs's avatar

GoChiefs

Resident Maniac

16,754 posts
Oct 14, 2012 3:51 PM
vball10set;1295114 wrote:Kind of like Oregon would "wax that ass" (?) in 2010 Rose Bowl, or that Miami would in 2002 Fiesta Bowl? smFh
The term "smFh" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
Oct 14, 2012 3:51pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 4:16 PM
GoChiefs;1295186 wrote:The term "smFh" needs to go.....like 6 months ago.
There has to be "someone" you can "antagonize" over on "the" high school forum, so "please", go.
Oct 14, 2012 4:16pm
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Oct 14, 2012 4:23 PM
vball10set;1295121 wrote:True, but I can't stand it when someone says this team "would do this" or "would do that" to a team, when as anyone who watches college football with any regularity knows that, on any given day....
LOL. I was stating my opinion which was backed by FACTS that YOU agreed with. Would you also "SMH" at me saying Alabama would beat BG by 5 TDs? ANY GIVEN DAY!!!!!
Oct 14, 2012 4:23pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 4:39 PM
Rotinaj;1295227 wrote:LOL. I was stating my opinion which was backed by FACTS that YOU agreed with. Would you also "SMH" at me saying Alabama would beat BG by 5 TDs? ANY GIVEN DAY!!!!!
What FACTS did YOU give that I agreed with??? Also, Alabama vs. BG is a little different than an (eligible) OSU opponent in the Rose Bowl, don't ya' think?
Oct 14, 2012 4:39pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Oct 14, 2012 4:54 PM
vball10set;1295241 wrote:What FACTS did YOU give that I agreed with??? Also, Alabama vs. BG is a little different than an (eligible) OSU opponent in the Rose Bowl, don't ya' think?

Yeah, BG's defense is better
Oct 14, 2012 4:54pm
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Oct 14, 2012 5:18 PM
vball10set;1295241 wrote:What FACTS did YOU give that I agreed with??? Also, Alabama vs. BG is a little different than an (eligible) OSU opponent in the Rose Bowl, don't ya' think?
The facts that were quoted in the same post that you quoted mine. I didnt realize this would be that difficult to understand. You REP a post saying OSU isnt that great this year and you "SMH" at my post saying OSU would lose by 14 in the Rose Bowl. What is so hard to understand about this????
Oct 14, 2012 5:18pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 5:49 PM
Rotinaj;1295271 wrote:The facts that were quoted in the same post that you quoted mine. I didnt realize this would be that difficult to understand. You REP a post saying OSU isnt that great this year and you "SMH" at my post saying OSU would lose by 14 in the Rose Bowl. What is so hard to understand about this????
His post was fact-based, yours was idiotic. My rep, my call.
Oct 14, 2012 5:49pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Oct 14, 2012 5:51 PM
LJ;1295253 wrote:Yeah, BG's defense is better
hahahahahahahahahahaha :rolleyes:....cute, but based on last night's performance, it's tough to argue with you.
Oct 14, 2012 5:51pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 14, 2012 6:41 PM
At this point in the season, I don't think predicting OSU would lose by 2 TDs in the Rose Bowl is idiotic.
Oct 14, 2012 6:41pm
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Oct 14, 2012 6:43 PM
vball10set;1295300 wrote:His post was fact-based, yours was idiotic. My rep, my call.
lol you arent very smart are you?
Oct 14, 2012 6:43pm
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Oct 14, 2012 6:44 PM
WebFire;1295329 wrote:At this point in the season, I don't think predicting OSU would lose by 2 TDs in the Rose Bowl is idiotic.
He repped a post saying osu isnt very good yet my post saying theyd lose by 2 TDs is idiotic.
Oct 14, 2012 6:44pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 14, 2012 6:54 PM
Rotinaj;1295334 wrote:He repped a post saying osu isnt very good yet my post saying theyd lose by 2 TDs is idiotic.
I know, that's what I was referring to.
Oct 14, 2012 6:54pm