Reps when I can.Commander of Awesome;1394347 wrote:So do a lot of people, including most on this site.
obvious butthurt is obvious.karen lotz;1394354 wrote:you don't get how sarcasm works. You say I know lotz about sports, sarcastically implying I don't know anything about sports. I say you know more, sarcastically implying you know less than I do. So your last comment sarcastically implies most on this site know less than I do about sports. SELFPWNFAIL. Can't wait for your butthurt response.
You know lotz about sportz. :thumbup:karen lotz;1394354 wrote:you don't get how sarcasm works. You say I know lotz about sports, sarcastically implying I don't know anything about sports. I say you know more, sarcastically implying you know less than I do. So your last comment sarcastically implies most on this site know less than I do about sports. SELFPWNFAIL. Can't wait for your butthurt response.
karen lotz;1394367 wrote:ALL PWN TEAM ASSEMBLE!!!!
lolkaren lotz;1394367 wrote:ALL PWN TEAM ASSEMBLE!!!!
like_that;1394360 wrote:obvious butthurt is obvious.
Elaboratejordo212000;1394438 wrote:he leaves a little to be desired.
Azubuike24;1394502 wrote:B.J. Mullens goes 1 for 12, 2 points, 3 turnovers and -29 on the night.
Solid performance.
Yeah not his night, had about 6 shots go half way in and pop out. He is still not consistent although he has played at a very high level since coming back from injury.Azubuike24;1394502 wrote:B.J. Mullens goes 1 for 12, 2 points, 3 turnovers and -29 on the night.
Solid performance.
Azubuike24;1394502 wrote:B.J. Mullens goes 1 for 12, 2 points, 3 turnovers and -29 on the night.
Solid performance.
ESPN says he was -27.Midstate01;1394516 wrote:3 players had more then -20 +/- mullens was actually a -31
Azubuike24;1394502 wrote:B.J. Mullens goes 1 for 12, 2 points, 3 turnovers and -29 on the night.
Solid performance.
The +/- numbers aren't surprising. The whole team got blasted. I didn't even see any of the game, I saw the box score in the 2nd and it wasn't even worth it.Pick6;1394520 wrote:ESPN says he was -27.
MKG was second worst, -22. Of course Az leaves that out
Most likely because he's injured, as always, and didn't play in that game.Commander of Awesome;1394562 wrote:Who's the big IU fan on here? Have you seen Eric Gordon play this year? I think he has potential to be in the top 5 SG discussion. Looking at his stats for this season, theyre not terrible. But when I watched the Cavs play NO this week I barely noticed him.
Commander of Awesome;1394562 wrote:Who's the big IU fan on here? Have you seen Eric Gordon play this year? I think he has potential to be in the top 5 SG discussion. Looking at his stats for this season, theyre not terrible. But when I watched the Cavs play NO this week I barely noticed him.
One of the best games I've seen as of late. Both teams playing at a very high level.Ironman92;1395302 wrote:Lakers and Mavericks trading punches
wildcats20;1395304 wrote:One of the best games I've seen as of late. Both teams playing at a very high level.
That would be me, and as others have said, he cant play in in 2 games in a row. Plays in one, and then has to sit out the next. He has had some good games, and then some games where he doesnt get as many minutes. His knee is really giving him a lot of issues.Commander of Awesome;1394562 wrote:Who's the big IU fan on here? Have you seen Eric Gordon play this year? I think he has potential to be in the top 5 SG discussion. Looking at his stats for this season, theyre not terrible. But when I watched the Cavs play NO this week I barely noticed him.
