data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 3:01pm
1. Ideological Purity ( with em or against em)
2. Compromise is weakness
3. A fundamental belief in scriptural literalism
4. Denying Science
5. Unmoved by facts
6. Undeterred by new information
7. A hostile fear of progress
8. A demonization of education
9. A need to control women's bodies
10. Intolerance of dissent
11. Pathological hatred of the U.S. Govt.
There you go guys...11 reasons with out mentioning race
I did not leave the right.... The right left me.
2. Compromise is weakness
3. A fundamental belief in scriptural literalism
4. Denying Science
5. Unmoved by facts
6. Undeterred by new information
7. A hostile fear of progress
8. A demonization of education
9. A need to control women's bodies
10. Intolerance of dissent
11. Pathological hatred of the U.S. Govt.
There you go guys...11 reasons with out mentioning race
I did not leave the right.... The right left me.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Aug 27, 2012 3:07pm
Change a couple of words on a few and you get pretty much the same list for liberals:
1. Ideological Purity ( with em or against em)
2. Compromise is weakness
3. A fundamental faith in unproven science
4. Denying reality
5. Unmoved by facts
6. Undeterred by new information
7. A hostile fear of success
8. A demonization of capitalism
9. A need to remove responsibility
10. Intolerance of dissent
11. Pathological hatred of free trade
1. Ideological Purity ( with em or against em)
2. Compromise is weakness
3. A fundamental faith in unproven science
4. Denying reality
5. Unmoved by facts
6. Undeterred by new information
7. A hostile fear of success
8. A demonization of capitalism
9. A need to remove responsibility
10. Intolerance of dissent
11. Pathological hatred of free trade
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d5/fe3d5e1c1793efdfc25f8d449187c8727d3d59de" alt="fish82's avatar"
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Aug 27, 2012 3:10pm
Neads moar hyperbole. :rolleyes:Devils Advocate;1255691 wrote:1. Ideological Purity ( with em or against em)
2. Compromise is weakness
3. A fundamental belief in scriptural literalism
4. Denying Science
5. Unmoved by facts
6. Undeterred by new information
7. A hostile fear of progress
8. A demonization of education
9. A need to control women's bodies
10. Intolerance of dissent
11. Pathological hatred of the U.S. Govt.
There you go guys...11 reasons with out mentioning race
I did not leave the right.... The right left me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 3:16pm
Ok... They are pee pee heads.
S
stlouiedipalma
Posts: 1,797
Aug 27, 2012 3:54pm
Obviously you are a viewer of "The Newsroom" on HBO. That piece was the climax to last night's season finale. Interesting description, I must say. It's pretty easy to figure out Aaron Sorkin's politics, if you have followed his career at all. I liked the series, although it could have done without the romantic subplots.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 4:13pm
^^^
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Aug 27, 2012 4:58pm
You left out beheadings ....... taliban turbin wraps whacked off 17 yesterday; not sure how many the Tea Party did.
You know the republic is in serious trouble when the defenders of liberty and advocates of fiscal sanity are chastised, ridiculed and maligned. Simply amazing.
You know the republic is in serious trouble when the defenders of liberty and advocates of fiscal sanity are chastised, ridiculed and maligned. Simply amazing.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Aug 27, 2012 5:04pm
That's my thought. But it's what liberals without ideas have been reduced to.QuakerOats;1255766 wrote: You know the republic is in serious trouble when the defenders of liberty and advocates of fiscal sanity are chastised, ridiculed and maligned. Simply amazing.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Aug 27, 2012 5:29pm
Frankly, I find this thread title/topic to be entirely over the top and highly offensive and am asking the moderators to remove the thread completely. What a disgrace!
[h=3]Taliban Behead 17 Who
Attended Dance Party[/h]Victims were Afghan civilians who attended a large party similar to one above held recently in Pakistan
[h=3]Taliban Behead 17 Who
Attended Dance Party[/h]Victims were Afghan civilians who attended a large party similar to one above held recently in Pakistan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a28d/3a28d8d82ef8ea62413a3cf2f5308665d17dc3e7" alt="Heretic's avatar"
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Aug 27, 2012 5:44pm
Over-the-top labeling only cool when you do it?QuakerOats;1255789 wrote:Frankly, I find this thread title/topic to be entirely over the top and highly offensive and am asking the moderators to remove the thread completely. What a disgrace!
Taliban Behead 17 Who
Attended Dance Party
Victims were Afghan civilians who attended a large party similar to one above held recently in Pakistan
M
mella
Posts: 647
Aug 27, 2012 6:51pm
Actually it is the liberals that are totally against beheading. They are trying to outlaw circumcision even though there is a higher rate of penile cancer in the uncircumcised.QuakerOats;1255766 wrote:You left out beheadings ....... taliban turbin wraps whacked off 17 yesterday; not sure how many the Tea Party did.
M
mella
Posts: 647
Aug 27, 2012 6:57pm
The libs are waging a war against penises. A man's body does not belong to the Gov't. I choose to choose for my son.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Aug 27, 2012 7:38pm
http://www.economist.com/node/21560566?fsrc=scn%2Frd_ec%2Fthe_benefits_of_hindsightQuakerOats;1255766 wrote:You left out beheadings ....... taliban turbin wraps whacked off 17 yesterday; not sure how many the Tea Party did.
You know the republic is in serious trouble when the defenders of liberty and advocates of fiscal sanity are chastised, ridiculed and maligned. Simply amazing.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Aug 27, 2012 7:38pm
What?mella;1255833 wrote:The libs are waging a war against penises. A man's body does not belong to the Gov't. I choose to choose for my son.
M
mella
Posts: 647
Aug 27, 2012 7:52pm
http://www.rightwingnews.com/health/san-francisco-petition-to-ban-circumcision-is-about-much-more-than-skin/I Wear Pants;1255855 wrote:What?
Protect your right to choose for your son. Don't let him be the only one wearing a turtleneck in the shower.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 7:54pm
I see the trouble as being worried about gay marriage, Worried about my wife's reproductive health, and suppressing votes of legal US citizens. I guess they forgot about the whole debt thing.QuakerOats;1255766 wrote:You left out beheadings ....... taliban turbin wraps whacked off 17 yesterday; not sure how many the Tea Party did.
You know the republic is in serious trouble when the defenders of liberty and advocates of fiscal sanity are chastised, ridiculed and maligned. Simply amazing.
Thanks Quaker....you proved my point. You are Taliban :laugh:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 7:59pm
So you think that it is OK for a mother to circumcise a live baby against it's informed consent and not ok for a female to abort a parasite?mella;1255858 wrote:http://www.rightwingnews.com/health/san-francisco-petition-to-ban-circumcision-is-about-much-more-than-skin/
Protect your right to choose for your son. Don't let him be the only one wearing a turtleneck in the shower.
M
mella
Posts: 647
Aug 27, 2012 8:02pm
I support a woman's right to choose. I'm think abortion is not right but I would never tell someone else they could not do it.Devils Advocate;1255863 wrote:So you think that it is OK for a mother to circumcise a live baby against it's informed consent and not ok for a female to abort a parasite?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 8:10pm
See, you are the Taliban. you think that I am a disgrace ( religious term ) and would take away my right to express my opinion.QuakerOats;1255789 wrote:Frankly, I find this thread title/topic to be entirely over the top and highly offensive and am asking the moderators to remove the thread completely. What a disgrace!
n
Thanks for proving my point Taliban man.:laugh::laugh::laugh
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 8:11pm
So..... What's with the foreskin reference?mella;1255867 wrote:I support a woman's right to choose. I'm think abortion is not right but I would never tell someone else they could not do it.
M
mella
Posts: 647
Aug 27, 2012 8:14pm
It was a beheading joke
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82795/8279506184bd0bb25b2f019d01f2ae0799187d98" alt="Devils Advocate's avatar"
Devils Advocate
Posts: 4,539
Aug 27, 2012 8:19pm
Sorry, I was hoping that you were a stupid Taliban. I stand corrected.
M
mella
Posts: 647
Aug 27, 2012 8:22pm
I can be whatever you want me to be. I am so sick and tired of the right and the left (American versions). Neither party represents me and each party is full of loud mouth radicals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0cff/a0cfffde9372a2f285d0cb1a21d01d340e9d41dd" alt="ts1227's avatar"
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Aug 27, 2012 8:24pm
You said whacked off, heh.QuakerOats;1255766 wrote:You left out beheadings ....... taliban turbin wraps whacked off 17 yesterday; not sure how many the Tea Party did.
I refuse to be any more serious than this on the Politics forum anymore, because there's no point.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Aug 27, 2012 8:25pm
I'm not protecting your right to cut your son's penis.mella;1255858 wrote:http://www.rightwingnews.com/health/san-francisco-petition-to-ban-circumcision-is-about-much-more-than-skin/
Protect your right to choose for your son. Don't let him be the only one wearing a turtleneck in the shower.
I don't have like strong feelings on the subject but I also don't really see any reason why it needs to be done so it doesn't bug me if they'd ban them.