Well this is interesting both Dem and Reps thinking the same thing.

Security leaks coming from White House ... really !

Are some Dem tired of covering Obama back and are now looking out for themself. Are some Democrat seeing the hand writting on the ballet boxes that Obama 4 years of failure will bring them down also. Are some Dem ready to throw Obama under the bus like he do to some many. Is the Holder issue to hot for them to handle now and want to separate themself from Obama when given the option?


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/24/romney-says-security-leaks-political-calls-for-probe-into-contemptible-conduct/

1. The Administration has actually had the most convictions and investigations of people who leak.
2. The Iran cyber link, picked up by the NYT was actually also picked up without aid of leaks by Wired magazine, and ISIS who examined the technical details of what was happening and determined it was a virus, and from the U.S./ Israel.
3. Every White House leaks. Name one that didn't.
4. Romney today didn't outline much. He basically blasted the administration without offering much of an alternative that is not neoconservative driven.

ptown_trojans_1;1232984 wrote:1. The Administration has actually had the most convictions and investigations of people who leak.
2. The Iran cyber link, picked up by the NYT was actually also picked up without aid of leaks by Wired magazine, and ISIS who examined the technical details of what was happening and determined it was a virus, and from the U.S./ Israel.
3. Every White House leaks. Name one that didn't.
4. Romney today didn't outline much. He basically blasted the administration without offering much of an alternative that is not neoconservative driven.

How many of those people convicted by the Obama administration of leaks were Republicans who didn't go along with Obama and how many were Democrats?

So now Dem are back tracking their comments. Wonder why? Cant handle the truth :laugh:


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/24/senate-intelligence-committee-head-regrets-speculating-about-leaks/

password;1233124 wrote:How many of those people convicted by the Obama administration of leaks were Republicans who didn't go along with Obama and how many were Democrats?

No idea, because most were career civil servants, and the case files are sealed.

Belly35;1233125 wrote:So now Dem are back tracking their comments. Wonder why? Cant handle the truth :laugh:


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/24/senate-intelligence-committee-head-regrets-speculating-about-leaks/

No, because the leaks portion isn't solely on the President.
As I stated, most of the information regarding the Iran Stuxnet was already out there and found and reported by Wired Magazine, and ISIS. Symantec found the virus and traced its point of origin. They also tracked the other incarnations and issued reports.

Hell, I wrote a piece on it using other sources speculating due to the complexities of the Iranian failures it was Israeli or U.S.

David Sanger then took most of that info, used his sources, from both Obama and Bush and connected some dots.

Also, if you really want to talk about leaks, rip Woodward and his books on Bush and Obama. He printed so much internal information from internal personnel.

ptown_trojans_1;1233126 wrote:No idea, because most were career civil servants, and the case files are sealed.

I will go out on a limb and guess that no person in the Obama inner circle has been convicted of anything.

password;1233147 wrote:I will go out on a limb and guess that no person in the Obama inner circle has been convicted of anything.

Nope, all middle and lower level it appears.
No one is ever convicted at the higher level, except Libby.

ptown_trojans_1;1233160 wrote:Nope, all middle and lower level it appears.
No one is ever convicted at the higher level, except Libby.

Ok, you may have a point there.